Skip to content

Telemedicine in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients Post-ACS

Remote Acute Assessment of Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05015634
Acronym
TELE-ACS
Enrollment
337
Registered
2021-08-20
Start date
2022-01-06
Completion date
2025-05-31
Last updated
2026-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

Myocardial infarction, Acute coronary syndrome, Telemedicine, Heart Attack

Brief summary

This is a non-CTIMP randomised controlled trial looking at the utilisation of telemedicine devices to provide remote, clinically necessary, diagnostic information, without the need for hospital attendance that patients will take home with them following admission to hospital with a heart attack.

Detailed description

Following hospital admission with a heart attack, telemedicine equipment can provide patients with remote, clinically necessary diagnostic information without the need for hospital attendance, which they can take home when they discharge from the hospital. In this project, patients known to be at high risk of ACS are equipped and empowered to seek urgent medical attention without visiting the hospital, if they experience symptoms, and to determine whether or not to seek emergency treatment, with an immediate remote specialist consultation, as assessed by validated technology. Those enrolled in the intervention group will be offered telemedicine packages upon discharge from the hospital. Those enrolled in the active arm will have their telemedicine package provided to the trial team when they conduct an ECG and seek medical attention. In contrast, in the control group, routine clinical care will be provided, as well as follow up by phone over 9 months.

Interventions

Patient develops possible cardiac symptoms, takes an ECG, BP and oxygen saturation as per their training. Patient will receive a phone call by the trial cardiologist who will have access to a high-quality ECG trace, as well as blood pressure and oxygen saturations, and coupled with the clinical history, can decide on the most appropriate course of further management. With remote follow up over the phone at 3, 6 and 9 months.

OTHERControl Arm

Standard routine clinical care will be carried out, with remote follow up over the phone at 3, 6 and 9 months.

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER
King Khalid University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A total of 338 patients will be randomised 1:1 to the 2 trial arms over 9 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1 ACS Patients diagnosed with elevated hs-cTnI I who have undergone coronary intervention for NSTEMI or STEMI or unstable angina. * 2 In addition, the participant should have at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor: * Current or ex-Tobacco Use * Hypertension * Diabetes * Hypercholesterolaemia. * Male aged \> 50 years. * 3 Access to a smartphone or smart device.

Exclusion criteria

* 1 The inability to apply/use the telemonitoring equipmentt * 2 Life expectancy of 9 months or less.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Hospital Readmission at 6 Months6 monthsAt 6 months of follow up, compare formal admissions and not emergency room visits in intervention to control groups.
Emergency Department Visits at 6 Months6 MonthsAny emergency department visits not requiring admission or further intervention will be compared in both study groups at 6 months of follow up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of StayFrom discharge to 9 months follow-upLength of stay at 3, 6, and 9 months will be compared in both study groups.
All-cause Mortality6 monthsAt 6 months of follow up, compare all-cause mortality, morbidity
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 9 Months9 monthsNumber of participants with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 9 months follow-up.
Medical Intervention6 monthsCompare Medical intervention for for acute coronary syndromes or heart failure, including coronary angiography/ angioplasty, injectable therapy or oxygen therapy for both study groups when readmission to hospital.
9 Months Readmission Rates9 monthsThe readmission rates for 9 months will be compared in both study groups.
Patient-Reported Quality of Life - 3 Months3 monthsQuality of life was assessed using the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7). Both instruments generate domain scores from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health status or angina-related quality of life. Questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-discharge) and 3 months post-discharge, and follow-up scores were compared with baseline values.
Patient-Reported Quality of Life - 6 Months6 monthsQuality of life was assessed using the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7). Both instruments generate domain scores from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health status or angina-related quality of life. Questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-discharge) and 6 months post-discharge, and follow-up scores were compared with baseline values.
Patient-Reported Quality of Life - 9 Months9 monthsQuality of life was assessed using the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7). Both instruments generate domain scores from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health status or angina-related quality of life. Questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-discharge) and 9 months post-discharge, and follow-up scores were compared with baseline values.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRamzi Y Khamis, MB ChB PhD FRCP

Imperial College London

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Customized
Age (years)
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Current or ex-smoker96 Participants
Diabetes49 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
120 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
156 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
290 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1632 / 167
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1630 / 167
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 16337 / 167

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026