Skip to content

Physical Training in Glioblastoma Patients During Cytotoxic Therapy

Glioblastoma and Sports - Does a Personal Training Program Improve Physical Performance and Quality of Life of Brain Tumor Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05015543
Acronym
MMH
Enrollment
54
Registered
2021-08-20
Start date
2020-07-23
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioblastoma

Keywords

sports, Glioblastoma (GBM), physical training, Quality of Life (QOL), Neuro-Oncology, Psycho-Oncology, fitness

Brief summary

The aim of the present study is the prospective controlled use of physical activity in a collective of patients with glioblastoma after surgery and concomitant radiation/chemotherapy and during adjuvant cytotoxic therapy. The research question is whether physical exercise is feasible and whether patients benefit physically and mentally from the activities performed. For this purpose, specific training units under the supervision of a certified trainer and sports scientist as well as standardized sports medical test procedures are implemented. Beyond the instructed training, general physical activity phases are recorded electronically using a pedometer/activity tracker, which is worn at all times. It will be examined whether the individual training program 1. improves physical fitness 2. increases quality of life/life satisfaction throughout the intervention 3. can be detected in blood due to increased concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor 1 (BDNF-1) (voluntary) The measurements should be taken before and 8, 16 and 24 weeks after the start of training.

Detailed description

The personal trainers of the university clinics in Bochum and Homburg/Saar receive specific training activities from Münster's trainer Ralf Brandt in order to ensure a standardized concept. This way, a comparison of the trainings' conduction and recording is possible both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Interventions

OTHERPersonal Training Program

One training sessions includes an interval training on a bicycle ergometer. The second one is a strength training with exercise machines. Both trainings are supplemented by coordinative aspects.

Sponsors

University Hospital Muenster
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Newly diagnosed glioblastoma * Karnofsky Index ≥ 70 * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤ 2 * ≥ 18 years * Completed surgical therapy * Completed radiation and chemotherapy * Thrombocytes \> 50.000/µl * Hb \> 8 mg/dl * Ability to give consent * Mother tongue German/very good German skills

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed dementia (Mini-Mental-State-Test \< 24/30 points) * Pain (strong, permanent, restricting movement) * Impairment of consciousness * Fever * Acute infection * Pregnancy and lactation * Insufficiently adjusted epilepsy (despite anticonvulsive therapy \> 3 focal seizures per day or \> 1 generalized seizure in the previous 3 days)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Increase in Physical Performance according to Physical Work Capacity (PWC) TestBetween week 0 and 16.Evidence of a significant increase (at least 15%) in physical work \[watt/kilogram bodyweight\] at PWC75% of maximum heart rate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PWCafter 8, 16 and 24 weekschanges over time, follow-up
Spiroergometry - maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max)Between week 0 and 16 (and 24).Changes in the maximal oxygen consumption (measured during spiroergometry)
Spiroergometry - lactateBetween week 0 and 16 (and 24).Changes in the individual anaerobic lactate threshold (measured during spiroergometry)
Physical Work Capacity (PWC)Between week 0 and 16 (and 24).PWC stratified according to: * age (\<40, 40-60, \>60 years) * Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (70-80 vs. 90-100 %) * Gender * PWC test 130, 150, (170)
Distress Thermometer (DT)Between week 0 and 16 (and 24).Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using a standardized questionnaire; scale from 1 (not stressed at all) to 10 (extremly stressed); Times of measurement in week 0, 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Between week 0 and 16 (and 24).Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using a standardized questionnaire; The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-rating scale developed to assess psychological distress in non-psychiatric patients. It consists of two subscales, anxiety and depression (14 items); Times of measurement in week 0, 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24.
EORTC-QLQ-C30 Brain moduleBetween week 0 and 16 (and 24).Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using a standardized questionnaire; The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire contains 30 questions and assesses the quality of life of oncology patients multidimensionally across 10 subscales. Times of measurement in week 0, 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026