Skip to content

Impact of Symbiofilm On Nasal Microbiota

Assessment of Sino-nasal Microbial Communities Changes in Adult Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis by 16 rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing Before and After 1-month Treatment Duration With Healsea® Chronic: an Exploratory Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05015530
Acronym
ISONAM
Enrollment
12
Registered
2021-08-20
Start date
2022-12-12
Completion date
2023-05-19
Last updated
2024-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Microbiome, Rhinosinusitis Chronic

Keywords

Rhinosinusitis chronic, Adult, Biofilm, 16S rRNA sequencing, Nasal spray, Microbiome

Brief summary

Healsea® chronic is CE marked medical device indicated in adults for the treatment of nasal symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis. This is an hypertonic seawater-based nasal spray supplemented with natural Symbiofilm® extract (0.2%) isolated from marine bacteria. In vitro, Symbiofilm® inhibits at early stage biofilm formation from bacteria found to be more prevalent and abundant in CRS patients (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa). This exploratory study is designed with aim to determine if the antibiofilm properties of Symbiofilm® may modify sino-nasal microbiota, impacting α and/ or β diversities.

Detailed description

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammation of the nose and paranasal sinuses and is characterized by two or more symptoms, one of which should be either nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior nasal drip), lasting for 12 weeks or longer. In addition, facial pain or pressure and a reduction in the sense of smell can occur. The condition can occur with or without nasal polyps. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a significant health problem and affects 5-12% of the general population. The physiopathology of CRS is poorly understood with multiple environmental, host and microbial factors being implicated. Putative pathological factors include changes in the microbiota, imbalance of the local or systemic immune system, allergens, toxins and genetic predisposition. A dysbiosis mechanism has been proposed as modulating inflammation in diseased sinuses. This hypothesis suggests that externally influenced changes in the nasal microbiome can result in dysbiosis, i.e. a shift from a normal or healthy microbial community structure and that this shift may be responsible for the initiation or maintenance of CRS. For example, the disruption of the commensal biofilm during a viral upper respiratory tract infection can create a niche for pathogenic species to grow. Despite many contradictory statements in the different studies some common trends emerge. Less diversity in the microbial community rather than an increased overall bacterial load seems to characterize CRS compared to the healthy state with no consensus about specific genera indicative of disease. However, anaerobes and S. aureus are found to be significantly more prevalent and abundant in CRS versus healthy controls. Bacterial biofilm is detected on the sinus mucosa in up to 80% of CRS patients and its presence does not imply that it is causing mucosal inflammation. However, in the context of CRS, there are several possible mechanisms by which biofilms may be pro-inflammatory including the release of planktonic organisms and the release of superantigens, which can cause ciliary dysfunction and inhibition of ciliary clearance. Bacterial biofilms are likely a key modulator of the refractory nature of CRS. Although clinical evidence from well-designed trials is scarce, European Guidelines for chronic rhinosinusitis recommend daily nasal saline irrigation for reduction of the severity of symptoms of CRS. A recent Cochrane analysis has concluded that daily nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline solution is more effective than placebo to improve patient symptoms. The exact mechanisms by which nasal irrigation works are not known. However, most of the experts agree that it is primarily a mechanical intervention leading to direct cleansing of the nasal mucosa. Nevertheless, the efficacy of such solution remains moderate. Healsea® Chronic is a CE marked medical device indicated in adults for the treatment of nasal symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis. This is a seawater-based nasal spray supplemented with a natural Symbiofilm® extract (0.02%) isolated from marine bacteria. The nasal solution is hypertonic (NaCl 2.2%). Symbiofilm® is a marine postbiotic comprising active exopolysaccharides with emulsifying properties and in vitro antibiofilm activity. Antibiofilm properties have been demonstrated with the colorimetric microtiter plate assay. In this model, a significant inhibition of biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae are observed. Detachment properties from human nasal epithelial cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa has also been demonstrated in vitro, suggesting an inhibition of biofilm formation at early stage in this model. Symbiofilm® has no bacteriostatic nor bactericidal activities. To date, properly designed studies to evaluate the effect of topical therapies on microbiome are scarce so no definite conclusion can be made. In one study, use of saline irrigation with or without budesonideDCI used was not associated with significantly distinct microbiota composition among either controls or post-operative CRS patients with polyp. This exploratory study is designed with aim to determine if the antibiofilm properties of Symbiofilm® may modify sino-nasal microbiota, impacting α and/ or β diversities. To this end middle meatus swab specimen will be taken from CRS patients before and after treatment with Healsea® Chronic. Bacteria colonization will be assessed using quantitative PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Improvement of nasal symptoms and quality of life will be assessed with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score-22 (SNOT-22). Post-market vigilance of Healsea® Chronic and vigilance of study procedures will be assessed throughout the study.

Interventions

DEVICEHealsea® Chronic, hypertonic seawater-based nasal spray supplemented with natural Symbiofilm® extract

Healsea® Chronic nasal spray will be administered twice daily (1 puff, 1-2 sec) in each nostril during 30 days

Sponsors

Lallemand Pharma AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female, aged 18 - 70 years 2. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form 3. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 4. Diagnosed with CRS based on the diagnostic criteria of the EPOS guideline 5. Registered with a social security scheme or covered by such a regime

Exclusion criteria

1. Antibiotics or oral corticosteroids intake in the month prior to the study 2. Endoscopic sinus surgery in the past 6 months 3. Cystic fibrosis 4. Wegener's granulomatosis 5. Immunodeficiency 6. Defective access to middle meatus 7. Lidocaine allergy 8. Known hypersensitivity/allergy to any component of the test device 9. Pregnant/Lactating female or absence of efficient contraception 10. Under tutorship or guardianship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparaison of Alpha-diversity of Sino-nasal Microbiota Before and After Treatment (Visit 1 and Visit 2)At baseline (V1) and at end of the 30-day treatment period (V2)Comparaison of the values of alpha diversity of bacterial species assessed by the Shannon index at baseline and after the treatment period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of Healsea® Chronic on Quality of Life Assessed by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Score-22End of treatment (Visit 2(V2)-Day 30) versus screening/inclusion (Visit 1(V1)-Day 1)Change of SNOT-22 total score at the end of the 30-day treatment period versus baseline . A change \>-9 is deemed clinically meaningful.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability)Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment)To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding the medical device usability
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste)Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment)To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding the sensory perception (residual taste after spraying)
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy)Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment)To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding product efficacy for chronic Rhinosinusitis (Cleansing and Moistening of nasal mucosa)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reporting of Adverse Events, Incidents and Expected Side EffectsDuring the intervention, up to 30 daysAssessment of materiovigilance from the medical device (incidents, expected side effects) and reporting of adverse reactions related to the additional invasive procedure (swab of the nasal meatus)

Countries

France

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The subjects will be recruited by the site among outpatients coming for routine consultation because of CRS. The first patient was screened and enrolled on 12th December 2022, the last patient was screened and enrolled on 25th April 2023.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healsea® Chronic: Hypertonic Seawater-Based Nasal Spray With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract
Healsea® Chronic nasal spray will be administered twice a day (1 puff, 1-2 sec) in each nostril during 30 days.
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealsea® Chronic: Hypertonic Seawater-Based Nasal Spray With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
Age, Continuous43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Baseline SNOT-22 (total)59.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants
α diversity2.041 Shannon Index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Comparaison of Alpha-diversity of Sino-nasal Microbiota Before and After Treatment (Visit 1 and Visit 2)

Comparaison of the values of alpha diversity of bacterial species assessed by the Shannon index at baseline and after the treatment period

Time frame: At baseline (V1) and at end of the 30-day treatment period (V2)

Population: Full Analysis Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValueComparaison of Alpha-diversity of Sino-nasal Microbiota Before and After Treatment (Visit 1 and Visit 2)2.041 Shannon IndexStandard Deviation 0.9
Healsea® Chronic After 30-day TreatmentComparaison of Alpha-diversity of Sino-nasal Microbiota Before and After Treatment (Visit 1 and Visit 2)2.114 Shannon IndexStandard Deviation 1.041
Comparison: α-diversity assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis testp-value: 0.908Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Impact of Healsea® Chronic on Quality of Life Assessed by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Score-22

Change of SNOT-22 total score at the end of the 30-day treatment period versus baseline . A change \>-9 is deemed clinically meaningful.

Time frame: End of treatment (Visit 2(V2)-Day 30) versus screening/inclusion (Visit 1(V1)-Day 1)

Population: Full Analysis Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValueImpact of Healsea® Chronic on Quality of Life Assessed by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Score-22Absolute values of SNOT-22 total score59.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValueImpact of Healsea® Chronic on Quality of Life Assessed by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Score-22Change of SNOT-22 total score versus baseline0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Healsea® Chronic After 30-day TreatmentImpact of Healsea® Chronic on Quality of Life Assessed by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Score-22Absolute values of SNOT-22 total score41.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
Healsea® Chronic After 30-day TreatmentImpact of Healsea® Chronic on Quality of Life Assessed by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Score-22Change of SNOT-22 total score versus baseline-17.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy)

To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding product efficacy for chronic Rhinosinusitis (Cleansing and Moistening of nasal mucosa)

Time frame: Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment)

Population: Full Analysis Population

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy)Very clear improvement4 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy)Missing0 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy)No improvement0 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy)Slight improvement2 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy)Moderate improvement6 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste)

To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding the sensory perception (residual taste after spraying)

Time frame: Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment)

Population: Full Analysis Population

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste)Missing0 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste)Not pleasant0 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste)Neutral8 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste)Pleasant3 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste)Very pleasant1 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability)

To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding the medical device usability

Time frame: Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment)

Population: Full Analysis Population

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability)Missing0 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability)Not easy0 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability)Pretty easy0 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability)Easy0 Participants
Healsea® Chronic Baseline ValuePatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability)Very easy12 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Reporting of Adverse Events, Incidents and Expected Side Effects

Assessment of materiovigilance from the medical device (incidents, expected side effects) and reporting of adverse reactions related to the additional invasive procedure (swab of the nasal meatus)

Time frame: During the intervention, up to 30 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026