Skip to content

Rhythmic Light Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease Patients

Phase 1 - The Use of Rhythmic Light Therapy to Entrain Gamma Oscillations and the Circadian System in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05015478
Enrollment
52
Registered
2021-08-20
Start date
2022-01-10
Completion date
2023-09-12
Last updated
2026-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Light Treatment, Circadian Rhythms, Gamma Wave Entrainment, Rhythmic Light, Mild Alzheimer's Disease, Sleep, Memory, Electroencephalogram

Brief summary

The investigator will investigate how light delivering 40 hertz (Hz) affects subjective sleep and cognition in a controlled laboratory study. A lab study will allow the collection of electroencephalogram (EEG) data, perform cognitive tests, and observe the response in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to a healthy control group (HC). Participants will attend two study sessions over the course of two weeks. During both sessions, all participants will experience 10 minutes of a low-level light, followed by a data collection period which involves a sleepiness rating, an electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, and a computerized memory test. Participants will then experience either a RL or a placebo RL condition for one hour, after which there will be a second data collection.

Detailed description

The investigator will demonstrate the effect of 40 hertz (Hz) rhythmic light (RL) to promote gamma wave entrainment (rhythmic light \[RL\]) on: brain response (electroencephalography \[EEG\]); cognitive performance (working memory task); and subjective sleepiness (questionnaires). The study will recruit 20 adult mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients and 20 healthy, age-matched controls (HC) to participate in this study. Sessions will initiate with a 10-minute adaptation period to a low-level ambient light providing illuminance of 15 lux at participants' eye level on a vertical plane, followed by a pre-exposure data collection period, including Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), EEG, and a working memory task. Participants will experience either 40 Hz RL or placebo RL conditions for a duration of 1 hour, followed by the second data collection period. On the second data collection day, participants will experience the other condition, so that all participants experience both lighting conditions. The experimental sessions will start at 14:00 on each experimental day which will be separated by 1 week.

Interventions

DEVICETailored Rhythmic Lighting Intervention

40 hertz (Hz) rhythmic lighting (RL) for a duration of 1 hour. The flicker frequency of the 40 Hz RL will be 40 Hz and the stimulation will be a square wave with a 50 % duty cycle (i.e., 12.5 milliseconds light- on and 12.5 milliseconds light-off). The RL will provide a 30 lux of red light on a vertical plane at the eye level.

DEVICEPlacebo Rhythmic Lighting Intervention

Placebo rhythmic light (RL) for a duration of 1 hour. In the placebo RL condition, the duty cycle will be delivered at randomly varying frequencies of 20 Hz and 50 Hz, specifically avoiding the frequency of 40 Hz. The placebo RL conditions will provide a 30 lux of red light on a vertical plane at the eye level.

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must be diagnosed with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease, as defined by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score between 17 and 25 * For the age-matched healthy controls, participants must not be diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease related dementias (MoCA score above 25). * Participants must score a 5 or less in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Exclusion criteria

* All participants must not be taking sleeping medication or oral melatonin * Presence of another brain disease that fully explains the dementia (extensive brain vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, traumatic brain injury, or multiple sclerosis) * residence in a skilled nursing facility or long-term care * Major organ failure (e.g., kidney failure) * Uncontrolled generalized disorders such as hypertension or diabetes * Obstructing cataracts, macular degeneration, and blindness * Severe sleep apnea or restless leg syndrome * History of epilepsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)baseline and during the light interventionElectroencephalography (EEG) recordings - the change in 40 Hz gamma power, computed by calculating the difference between the average gamma power at baseline (T1) and during the light intervention (T2). This difference was obtained by subtracting baseline 40 Hz power from the intervention 40 Hz power to assess acute neural effects

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Subjective Sleepiness Using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)Baseline and 1 hour after intervention (intervention is 2 hours)The Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) outcome prompts participants to rate how sleepy or alert they are feeling on a scale ranging from 1 to 9, where 1 = "very alert," 3 = "rather alert," 5 = "neither alert nor sleepy," 7 = "sleepy, but no difficulty remaining awake," and 9 = "very sleepy, fighting sleep, an effort to remain awake."

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMariana Figueiro, PhD

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Health Control
Health Participants - 1 hour intervention period where active lighting is experienced by participants or 1 hour intervention period where an inactive, placebo lighting condition is experienced by participants then in the second intervention experiences the opposite of the first intervention.
26
Mild Cognitive Impairment
Participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment - 1 hour intervention period where active lighting is experienced by participants or 1 hour intervention period where an inactive, placebo lighting condition is experienced by participants then in the second intervention experiences the opposite of the first intervention.
26
Total52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealth ControlMild Cognitive ImpairmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants21 Participants42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants19 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 260 / 260 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 260 / 260 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 260 / 260 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)

Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings - the change in 40 Hz gamma power, computed by calculating the difference between the average gamma power at baseline (T1) and during the light intervention (T2). This difference was obtained by subtracting baseline 40 Hz power from the intervention 40 Hz power to assess acute neural effects

Time frame: baseline and during the light intervention

Population: EEG data not collected for first 12 participants. Protocol revised to include EEG data collection subsequently.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MCI - Inactive Placebo Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)Oz3.54 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.43
MCI - Inactive Placebo Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)POz2.87 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.43
MCI - Inactive Placebo Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)Pz2.69 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.53
MCI - Active Tailored Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)Oz5.28 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.82
MCI - Active Tailored Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)POz5.18 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.88
MCI - Active Tailored Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)Pz5.24 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.94
HC - Placebo Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)Pz3.86 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.51
HC - Placebo Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)Oz2.83 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.53
HC - Placebo Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)POz3.29 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.51
HC - Active Tailored Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)Oz4.10 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.66
HC - Active Tailored Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)POz3.57 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.64
HC - Active Tailored Rhythmic LightingChange in Electroencephalography (EEG) Power at 40 Hertz (Hz)Pz3.56 μV2/HzStandard Deviation 0.55
Secondary

Cognition Using a Working Memory Task

Participants view a serial visual display of letters and math problems. They are asked to hold the letters in memory while simultaneously determining if the simple math problems are correct (e.g., 7+5=13). Performance is assessed in percent correct and by measuring accuracy and Reaction Time (RT).

Time frame: 1 hour after intervention (intervention is 2 hours)

Secondary

Mean Change in Subjective Sleepiness Using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)

The Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) outcome prompts participants to rate how sleepy or alert they are feeling on a scale ranging from 1 to 9, where 1 = very alert, 3 = rather alert, 5 = neither alert nor sleepy, 7 = sleepy, but no difficulty remaining awake, and 9 = very sleepy, fighting sleep, an effort to remain awake.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 hour after intervention (intervention is 2 hours)

Population: EEG data not collected for first 12 participants. Protocol revised to include EEG data collection subsequently.~Outcome measure is comparing the two interventions Active Tailored Rhythmic Lighting vs Inactive Placebo Rhythmic Lighting regardless of cognitive status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MCI - Inactive Placebo Rhythmic LightingMean Change in Subjective Sleepiness Using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)0.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
MCI - Active Tailored Rhythmic LightingMean Change in Subjective Sleepiness Using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)0.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 24, 2026