Skip to content

Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.

Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05015036
Acronym
ERAMIS
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-08-20
Start date
2022-02-28
Completion date
2023-09-07
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spine Surgery

Brief summary

Prospective longitudinal multicentre observational study carried out on a population of patients undergoing minimally invasive spine surgery and divided into two parallel cohorts according to the presence or absence of a Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme. The patient will be assessed during 4 visits: At inclusion before surgery, at D0 (day of surgery), at D1 (postoperative visit) and at M1 (follow-up visit).

Detailed description

On a population of patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery divided into two cohorts of equal size according to the presence or absence of a Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme: Primary objective To compare the percentage of therapeutic success achieved in each group one month after surgery. Secondary objectives: to compare between groups: * Postoperative pain intensity at D1 and M1 * Analgesic consumption (in stages) at D1 and M1 * Pain-free walking distance at M1 * Surgery conditions (duration of operation, duration of hospitalisation) * Frequency of adverse events related to surgery (infection rate, 1 month recovery rate, transfusion requirements) * Emotional impact of the management

Interventions

PROCEDUREERAS

Minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

PROCEDUREMinimally invasive surgery

Classic Minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine

Sponsors

GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male or female (18 years or older) * Patient who has agreed to participate in the study and has read and signed the consent form for participation in the study * Patient for whom a minimally invasive spine surgery is planned: (dicectomy, lumbar canal recalibration with or without laminectomy, lumbar arthrodesis by posterior approach limited to one stage)

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with a contraindication to spinal anaesthesia * A bedridden or institutionalised patient * Mental deficiency or any other reason that may hinder the understanding or the strict application of the protocol * Patient not affiliated to the French social security system * Patient under legal protection, guardianship or curatorship * Patient already included in another therapeutic study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index improvementMonth 1The Oswestry Disability Index (Appendix 1) (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability) is the gold standard tool for assessing functional disability related to low back pain and functional recovery after surgery. It consists of ten questions rated from 0 to 5 (from most to least favourable). The result is expressed as a percentage according to the following formula \[score obtained / (maximum score)\] X 100. The maximum score is 50 if all the questions have been filled in, 45 if one question has not been filled in etc..... The disability rate, corresponding to the percentage, obtained is considered minimal between 0 and 20%, moderate between 21 and 40% and severe above 41%. Therapeutic success defined as an improvement ≥30% in the Oswestry Disability Index between initial and final visit is the primary endpoint

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of hospital stayMonth 1Length of hospital stay in days
Post-operative painDay 1The intensity of the pain will be assessed using a simple numerical scale (ENS) graduated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Consumption of level I, II and II analgesicsDay 1Consumption of level I, II and II analgesics. Count of treatments
Duration of interventionDay 1Duration of the surgery in hours
Evolution of Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale score and sub-scoresMonth 1The emotional impact of the disease will be more precisely evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire, a screening tool for the most common manifestations of anxiety and depressive disorders to be completed by the patient. The scale comprises 14 questions, with 7 items assessing anxiety and 7 items assessing depression. A minimum score of 10 on one of the sub-scores was retained as a criterion for detecting depressive or anxious manifestations. The HAD questionnaire will be completed by the patient at the inclusion visit (V1) and at the end of the study (V4).
Adverse events related to surgeryMonth 1All adverse events related to surgery will be collected and compared in the 2 groups
Visual Analogue Scale overall patient satisfactionMonth 1The patient's satisfaction with his or her treatment and results will be assessed at the end of the study on a visual analogue scale graduated from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied).
Pain-free walking perimeterMonth 1Measurement in meters of the distance the patient travels until he/she is forced to stop due to pain

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026