Skip to content

Ociperlimab With Tislelizumab and Chemotherapy in Participants With Untreated Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

AdvanTIG-205: A Phase 2, Randomized Study of Ociperlimab (BGB-A1217) and Tislelizumab With Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Locally Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05014815
Enrollment
272
Registered
2021-08-20
Start date
2021-11-16
Completion date
2024-09-04
Last updated
2025-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Locally Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, Stage IIIB, Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, Stage IV

Keywords

metastatic, Lung Cancer, Non-Squamous, Ociperlimab, Tislelizumab, Anti-PD-1, BGB-A317, BGB-A1217, Anti-TIGIT

Brief summary

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ociperlimab combined with tislelizumab and chemotherapy, compared to tislelizumab and chemotherapy alone, in participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was locally advanced, could not be removed by surgery, or had spread to other parts of the body.

Interventions

900 mg intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks (Q3W)

DRUGTislelizumab

200 mg IV Q3W

DRUGCarboplatin

Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5 or 6, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

DRUGPaclitaxel

75 or 200 mg per square meter (mg/m²) of body surface area, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

DRUGNab paclitaxel

100 mg/m², administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle

DRUGCisplatin

75 mg/m², administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

DRUGPemetrexed

500 mg/m² administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

DRUGPlacebo

Administered intravenously Q3W to match ociperlimab

Sponsors

BeiGene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Participants had histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was not eligible for curative surgical resection and/or definitive radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. Alternatively, participants had metastatic non-squamous or squamous NSCLC. 2. Participants had not received any prior systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic squamous or non-squamous NSCLC, including but not limited to chemotherapy or targeted therapies. Those who had previously received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy with curative intent for non-metastatic disease, were required to have experienced a disease-free interval of at least 6 months from the last dose of chemotherapy and/or concurrent radiotherapy prior to randomization. 3. Archival tumor tissue or a fresh biopsy (if archival tissue was unavailable) was required for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) level assessment and retrospective biomarker analyses. Only participants with evaluable PD-L1 results were considered eligible. 4. Participants were required to have had at least one measurable lesion as assessed by the investigator in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. 5. Participants had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1. Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Participants were excluded if they had known mutations in any of the following genes: * Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR): For participants with non-squamous NSCLC and unknown EGFR mutation status, tissue-based EGFR testing (performed either locally or at a central laboratory) or an endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)-based EGFR test was required prior to enrollment. Those found to harbor EGFR-sensitizing mutations were excluded. * Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene. * B-Raf Proto-Oncogene (BRAF) V600E mutation. * ROS Proto-Oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangement. 2. Participants who had received prior treatment with EGFR inhibitors, ALK inhibitors, or other targeted therapies for known driver mutations. 3. Participants who had received any prior therapies targeting T-cell costimulatory or checkpoint pathways (e.g., programmed cell death protein 1 \[PD-1\], programmed death-ligand 1 \[PD-L1\], or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 \[CTLA-4\]) for metastatic NSCLC were excluded. 4. Participants who had any condition requiring systemic treatment with corticosteroids at a dose greater than 10 mg of prednisone (or equivalent) daily, or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days prior to randomization. 5. Participants who had an active infection, including but not limited to tuberculosis, requiring systemic antibacterial, antifungal, or antiviral treatment within 14 days prior to randomization were excluded. Note: Additional protocol-defined inclusion and

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From randomization up to the final efficacy analysis data cut-off date of 04 September 2024; Up to 33 monthsPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first objectively documented disease progression as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR)From randomization up to the final efficacy analysis data cut-off date of 04 September 2024; Up to 33 monthsObjective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who had a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 Tumor assessments. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Duration of Response (DOR)From randomization up to the final efficacy analysis data cut-off date of 04 September 2024; Up to 33 monthsDOR was defined as the time from the first documented objective response to documented radiological disease progression as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive disease is captured as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, using the smallest sum on study as the reference (including the baseline sum if it was the smallest). In addition to the 20% relative increase, the sum also had to show an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization up to the final efficacy analysis data cut-off date of 04 September 2024; Up to 33 monthsOS was defined as the time from randomization to the documented date of death for participants who died on or before the clinical cutoff date. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data for participants who were alive at the clinical cutoff date were censored at their last known alive date, defined as either the clinical cutoff date for those still on treatment or the most recent available date confirming they were alive, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From first dose of study drug to 30 days after last dose, up to the study completion date cut-off date of 04 September 2024 (up to 32.4 months)The number of participants who experienced TEAEs and SAEs was reported. An adverse event refers to any unintended or unfavorable sign, symptom, or condition (including abnormal lab results) that occurs during the study, regardless of whether it is linked to the study drug. Investigators evaluated the severity of each adverse event according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.

Countries

Australia, Austria, China, France, Greece, South Korea, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 75 study centers in 8 countries (China, South Korea, United States of America, Australia, France, Spain, Austria, Greece).

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ociperlimab or placebo treatment, plus tislelizumab and chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified by histology (squamous versus non--squamous), and programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (O+T+C)
Ociperlimab (900 mg IV), tislelizumab (200 mg IV), and histology-based chemotherapy
136
Arm B (P+T+C)
Placebo, tislelizumab (200 mg IV), and histology-based chemotherapy
136
Total272

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath6370
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up42
Overall StudyPhysician Decision24
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalArm B (P+T+C)Arm A (O+T+C)
Age, Continuous63.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.697
63.77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.366
64.02 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.006
Histology
Non-Squamous
161 Participants80 Participants81 Participants
Histology
Squamous
111 Participants56 Participants55 Participants
Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expressio
1-49% of Tumor Cells
84 Participants42 Participants42 Participants
Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expressio
< 1% of tumor cells
115 Participants58 Participants57 Participants
Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expressio
> 50% of Tumor Cells
73 Participants36 Participants37 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
207 Participants102 Participants105 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
246 Participants123 Participants123 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
15 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
48 Participants25 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
54 Participants32 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
218 Participants104 Participants114 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
63 / 13670 / 136
other
Total, other adverse events
132 / 135132 / 136
serious
Total, serious adverse events
63 / 13574 / 136

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first objectively documented disease progression as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From randomization up to the final efficacy analysis data cut-off date of 04 September 2024; Up to 33 months

Population: Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (O+T+C)Progression-free Survival (PFS)8.2 Months
Arm B (P+T+C)Progression-free Survival (PFS)8.1 Months
p-value: 0.469895% CI: [0.74, 1.33]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the first documented objective response to documented radiological disease progression as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive disease is captured as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, using the smallest sum on study as the reference (including the baseline sum if it was the smallest). In addition to the 20% relative increase, the sum also had to show an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.

Time frame: From randomization up to the final efficacy analysis data cut-off date of 04 September 2024; Up to 33 months

Population: The analysis included only intent-to-treat participants with a confirmed complete or partial response per RECIST v1.1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (O+T+C)Duration of Response (DOR)10.4 months
Arm B (P+T+C)Duration of Response (DOR)11.2 months
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

The number of participants who experienced TEAEs and SAEs was reported. An adverse event refers to any unintended or unfavorable sign, symptom, or condition (including abnormal lab results) that occurs during the study, regardless of whether it is linked to the study drug. Investigators evaluated the severity of each adverse event according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to 30 days after last dose, up to the study completion date cut-off date of 04 September 2024 (up to 32.4 months)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A (O+T+C)Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of participants with any TEAEs134 Participants
Arm A (O+T+C)Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of participants with SAEs63 Participants
Arm B (P+T+C)Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of participants with any TEAEs135 Participants
Arm B (P+T+C)Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of participants with SAEs74 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who had a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 Tumor assessments. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From randomization up to the final efficacy analysis data cut-off date of 04 September 2024; Up to 33 months

Population: Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (O+T+C)Objective Response Rate (ORR)41.9 percentage of participants
Arm B (P+T+C)Objective Response Rate (ORR)47.8 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.47, 1.26]
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the documented date of death for participants who died on or before the clinical cutoff date. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data for participants who were alive at the clinical cutoff date were censored at their last known alive date, defined as either the clinical cutoff date for those still on treatment or the most recent available date confirming they were alive, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: From randomization up to the final efficacy analysis data cut-off date of 04 September 2024; Up to 33 months

Population: Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (O+T+C)Overall Survival (OS)20.6 Months
Arm B (P+T+C)Overall Survival (OS)19.4 Months
95% CI: [0.67, 1.34]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026