Skip to content

Feasibility of a Hybrid Delivery of Home-based Cluster Set Resistance Training in Lung Cancer

Feasibility of a Hybrid Delivery of Home-based Cluster Set Resistance Training in Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05014035
Enrollment
14
Registered
2021-08-20
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2022-09-22
Last updated
2023-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Resistance Exercise

Keywords

Exercise, Physical Activity, Lung Cancer

Brief summary

Symptom burden remains a critical concern for individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following the completion of treatment. Of those, symptom clusters such as dyspnea (shortness of breath) and fatigue, contribute to physical decline, reductions in quality of life, and a higher risk of comorbidities and mortality. It has been proposed that dyspnea is a primary limiter of exercise capacity in individuals with lung cancer, resulting in exercise avoidance and an accelerated physical decline. As such, specifically designing resistance exercise programs with cluster sets, to mitigate feelings of dyspnea and fatigue may result in improved exercise tolerance, resulting in the maintenance of physical function and quality of life. The purpose of this project is to investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a hybrid-delivery of home-based cluster-set resistance exercise in individuals with NSCLC. Methods: Individuals with NSCLC (n=15), within 12-months of completion of treatment will be recruited to participate in this single arm feasibility trial. Participants will complete 8-weeks of home-based resistance training (RT) designed to target dyspnea and fatigue. The hybrid-delivery of the program will include supervised sessions in the participants home, and virtual supervision via video conferencing. The primary outcome of feasibility will be measured via recruitment rates, retention, acceptability and intervention fidelity. Exploratory outcomes (dyspnea, fatigue, quality of life, physical function and body composition) will be assessed pre- and post- intervention.

Detailed description

Analysis plan. Descriptive statistics (percentages and means (with standard deviations)) will be used to report on feasibility outcomes (recruitment, retention, fidelity etc.). Unless explicitly stated, means and standard deviations will be reported for assessments of exploratory outcomes at baseline and follow-up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALResistance Exercise

This is an 8-week exercise program, delivered using a hybrid approach of in-person, in-home supervised exercise, and virtual delivery of exercise via zoom. Individuals will participate in resistance exercise 3 days per week for 8 weeks.

Sponsors

University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single-arm feasibility trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completed definitive treatment for localized NSCLC (stages I-III) * Has access to stable internet access for Zoom participation * Willing to complete an 8-week, home-based intervention program that includes face-to-face and Zoom interaction. * Willing to consider behavior change at this time. * Able to speak and read English. * Capable of informed consent * Has obtained medical clearance from medical practitioner or medical team

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with a known diagnosis of advanced lung cancer (stage IV; due to potential added burden) or diagnosis of small-cell lung cancer, * Anyone for whom physical activity is not recommended. * aren't comfortable having study staff visit their homes for exercise sessions * have any neuromuscular, cardiovascular, or psychological condition precluding safe exercise; * have participated in structured RE ≥2 times/week for the past 6 months; * are unable to read/understand English.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RecruitmentThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe recruitment goal of n=15 is reached
RetentionThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearIf ≥75% of the sample recruited to participate return for follow up testing
Intervention FidelityThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearExercise fidelity will be reported using metrics previously outlines by Fairman et al (2019). Specifically, volume load will be calculated as a function of sets x reps for each exercise and summed to give total volume for each session. We will report the proportion of volume achieved relevant to what was prescribed to give a relative-dose intensity (RDI) for each person. RDI will then be averaged and used to determine fidelity to the RT intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lung Cancer Related Quality of LifeBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS). Min score: 0; max score: 28. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Upper Body Muscular StrengthBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Chest Press five repetition maximum
Lower Body Muscular StrengthBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Leg Press five repetition maximum
Physical Function STSBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)5 times sit-to-stand (in seconds)
Physical Function 6MWTBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)6-minute Walk Test (distance in meters)
AcceptabilityAt post intervention (8-weeks)10-item scale adapted from McDonnell et al (PMID: 33118443). Questions assessing the acceptability of the intervention will be scored on a 4-point Likert-Type scale from Strongly disagree to Strongly Agree. Questions will ask about the utility of virtual exercise sessions, use of technology and level of tailoring the intervention
Fat Free MassBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Fat Free Mass (kg) Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
Total MassBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Total Mass (kg) Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
Body Fat PercentageBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
Appendicular Lean MassBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Sum of Arm and Leg Fat Free Mass
Bone Mineral DensityBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Total z-score Dual X-ray Absorptiometry
Fat MassBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Fat mass (kg) Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
DyspneaBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Dyspnea (FACIT-D) 10-Item short form (parts 1 and 2). Part 1 assesses Dyspnea and Part 2 assesses dyspnea-associated functional limitations. Min score for each part: 0; max score for each part: 30. Higher scores indicate worse dyspnea/burden
FatigueBaseline and post intervention (8-weeks)Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale 13-item scale. Min score: 0 Max score: 52 Higher scores mean higher quality of life.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026