Offense, Sex
Conditions
Keywords
sexual offenders;MIDSA
Brief summary
Evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention including the clinical assessment carried out with the (Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex, and Aggression) MIDSA and the review of the results with the professional in charge of the subject on the adherence and commitment to the care of the sexual offenders.
Detailed description
The intervention of MIDSA (Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex, and Aggression), a multidimensional investigation tool for issues related to sexuality and violence, could be prove very useful by providing AICS patients as well as the professionals who take care of them with a complete clinical assessment which enlightens the patient on his psychopathological functioning and / or his disorders, and which guides the care through the axes of intervention to be implemented in response to the criminological and non-criminological needs of the patient. This should allow the latter a better awareness (awareness) of his difficulties in the relationship with the other, facilitate his adherence to care, obtain a better commitment on his part in the process of change and consequently, bring him change their lifestyle and gradually adopt proactive attitudes and behavior that ultimately reduce the risk of recidivism of sexual and general violence. However, recourse to MIDSA as a change operator in a patient's trajectory is only possible if it is accompanied by a resumption of his clinical assessment by a professional who supports the change process by strengthening his motivation to change their criminal behavior.
Interventions
Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex, and Aggression
Usual methods of evaluation of each of the participating centers (CMP / CRIAVS / private practitioners, etc.).
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
open label multicenter randomized controlled trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult male patients * Express written consent of the participant after receiving the study information * Subject making contact or being taken in charge by a psychiatric service (even an addictology service or by liberal practitioners in connection with psychiatry), a CRIAVS or a care unit dedicated to the care of perpetrators of a sexual offense (AICS) ; * For a problem of sexual violence such as sexual harassment, assault and rape of adult women (including marital rape), incest, pedophilic or hebephilic acts, sexual sadism, exhibition, voyeurism, frotteurism, use and possession of child pornography or addiction sexual. * Affiliated to a social security scheme
Exclusion criteria
* Maximum stage (maintenance phase) listed on the URICA scale * Poor understanding of the French language; * Patient imprisoned, under legal protection, under guardianship or curatorship
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in behavior | up to 6 months | Change in behavior (awareness of its difficulties, commitment to care, motivation to abandon the previous lifestyle, etc.) and with reference to the transtheoretical model of stage change, it will be measured using the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) by the rate of patients with a stage of change at Month 6 higher than that observed at D0 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of the risk of violence (in general) and the risk factors of the sexual offenders | up to 1 year | The assessment of the risk of violence (in general) and the risk factors of the sexual offenders will be carried out from the Level of Service Inventory / Case Management Inventory (LS / CMI; Andrews , Bonta, & Wormith, 2000; Guay, 2008); |
| Assessment of the multidimensional self-esteem assessment (SEI) | up to 1 year | The multidimensional self-esteem assessment will be carried out by the Self-Esteem Inventory (SEI; Coopersmith, 1981) with 4 dimensions: general, social, family and professional self-esteem; |
| Assessment of the risk for sexual violence (RSVP) | up to 1 year | The risk assessment for sexual violence will be performed by the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP; Hart et al., 2003);cut-off score: 0-44 (lowrisk); score: 45-132 moderate to high risk |
| Assessment of social desirability will be carried out by the MCSDS | up to 1 year | The assessment of social desirability will be carried out by the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MCSDS) through its brief version of 20 items |
| Assessment of Risk factors and protective factors against violence | up to 1 year | Risk factors and protective factors against violence are assessed through a semi-structured interview (for assessment of Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP), Level of Service Inventory/Case Management Inventory (LS / CMI) and Structured Assessment of Protective Factors (SAPROF)) |
| Quality of life assessment | up to 1 year | The quality of life assessment will be carried out by the World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL-brief); Leplege, Reveillere, Ecosse, Caria, & Riviere, 2000; The WHOQOL Group, 1998) around four dimensions: physical health, psychological health, social relations and the environment. |
Countries
France