Skip to content

Paravertebral Versus Caudal Block in Pediatric PCNL

Ultrasound Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Epidural Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05012215
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-08-19
Start date
2021-08-19
Completion date
2022-03-20
Last updated
2021-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Stones, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Keywords

paravertebral block, caudal block, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, pediatric

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy of Ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block versus ultrasound guided caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Detailed description

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for complex upper renal tract calculi. Although the skin incision for PCNL appears small, the intensity of intraoperative and postoperative pain is significant owing to soft tissue injury. Paravertebral block is the technique of injecting local anesthetics in a space immediately lateral to where the spinal nerves emerge from the intervertebral foramina. This technique is used increasingly for intra-operative and post-operative. Caudal epidural block involves placing a needle through the sacral hiatus to deliver medications into the epidural space. This approach is used widely used for surgical anesthesia and analgesia in pediatric patients. this work aims to compare the efficacy of Ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block versus ultrasound guided caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Interventions

PROCEDUREParavertebral

Ultrasound-guided paravertebral block

PROCEDURECaudal block

Caudal block

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Exclusion criteria

* Coagulation disorders * Infection at the site of injection * Allergy to the local anesthetics used * Spinal cord abnormalities or neurological deficits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Blood pressure during surgery in mmHgthrough the surgery, an average of 2 hours
Heart rate (beats/minute)through the surgery, an average of 2 hours
The concentration of sevoflurane in %through the surgery, an average of 2 hours
Postoperative pain using FLACC scoreup to 12 hours

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactHany M. Osman, M.D.
hanymeo@aun.edu.eg+201002414591
Backup ContactFatma N. Mohamed, M.D.
fatmanabil2012@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026