Skip to content

Effect of Motor Imaginary Training on Upper Limb Functions in Stroke

Effect of Motor Imaginary Training on Upper Limb Functions in Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05008822
Enrollment
42
Registered
2021-08-17
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2021-12-30
Last updated
2022-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Cardiovascular

Keywords

Motor imaginary technique

Brief summary

This study will provide knowledge about effectiveness of motor imaginary training in upper limb performance in chronic stroke patients. Very little data is available about the use in Motor Imaginary in post stroke upper limb rehabilitation in Pakistan. Moreover, studies done previously did not specified population of stroke; This study will include MCA stroke patients only, whom upper limb weakness is more prevalent.

Detailed description

Motor imagery is a technique for inducing motor activity in response to a certain motor output by producing a mental image of the action without intending to conduct it. It is a cognitive technique that, rather than making a patient to pick up new procedures, promotes neural alterations in order enable the patient to re-acquire motor skills mastered before the CVA or copy the actions of others. Motor imaging training is a sort of therapy in which the patient imagines a gesture or movement in order to learn, reinforce, or improve the movement's performance. A study done in South Korea, published in 2015, revealed that Motor imagery training has a good impact on UL performance by refining functional mobility during stroke rehabilitation. The results suggest that motor imagery training is viable and helpful for improving UL function in CVA patients. Meta-analysis done in Australia in the year 2013, was supportive of Motor imaginary techniques further convincing that Mental imagery can be a possible intervention for stroke patients given that it being, safe cost-effective & unlimited practice opportunities. Study done in China in 2017, suggested that clinicians should consider the use of MI in addition to treatment currently used to improve upper extremity functions after stroke as no evidence of side effects or harm was noted . RCT done in year 2006 in USA indicated that for patients with chronic, moderate upper limb impairment after CVA, program of CIMT with mental practice only resulted in decrease impairment, with functional enhancement.

Interventions

OTHERMotor Imaginary Training Group

After the baseline assessment, the participant will receive Motor Imaginary Program

After the baseline assessment, the participant will receive MRP and CIMT training

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* MCA stroke * Chronic stroke patients * Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \>24 points * Spasticity grade II and III on Modified Ashworth scale

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cognitive disability such as depression, unilateral neglect, seizure, dementia, * Any MSK disorder including muscle contracture

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
wolf motor functionChange from Baseline to 4th WeeksThe Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a timed and functional test that assesses upper extremity motor skills in a quantitative manner.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026