Skip to content

Immobilization Without Reduction vs. Reduction Under General Anesthesia in Metaphyseal Fractures of the Distal Radius

Cast Immobilization Without Reduction vs. Reduction Under General Anesthesia in Metaphyseal Fractures of the Distal Radius.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05008029
Enrollment
59
Registered
2021-08-17
Start date
2021-06-15
Completion date
2024-07-15
Last updated
2024-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radius Fracture Distal

Keywords

radius fracture, children, conservative treatment, distal radius

Brief summary

Distal radius metaphyseal fractures are the most frequent in the pediatric population. The current treatment for angulated or shortened fractures is effective. Still, it exposes children to anesthetic risks supported by the pain generated by the reduction. Due to the excellent remodeling capacity of bone at an early age, it is questionable whether an anatomical reduction is necessary. The clinical experiment's objective is to compare the functional result of immobilization without reducing angulated or displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius against fractures brought to reduction under general anesthesia. Means difference in function subdomain of the upper limb of the PROMIS® scale is the primary outcome. The secondary results are wrist mobility, radius alignment, wrist articular relationships, and surgical complications.

Detailed description

The participant will be recruited in one center. If participants and their parents accept to participate in this study, treatments will be randomly allocated using the Big Stick Design technique with a maximum tolerated imbalance of 2. The sequence will be generated by a research assistant who is completely independent of the study, does not know the purpose of the study and the interventions. Each of the random numbers will be stored in an opaque envelope sealed externally with the order in which they should be opened. Patient registration and follow-up information will be stored in REDCap®. Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be evaluated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIn situ immobilization

Immobilization with an above-elbow cast. A 2, 3, or 4-year orthopedic resident or pediatric orthopedic fellow supervised by a pediatric orthopedic surgeon will perform the procedure without reduction, sedation, or anesthesia. Analgesia will be administered with paracetamol at doses of 10-15 mg/kg/dose or tramadol 0.5-1mg/kg/dose. Supposing immobilization is not satisfactory, or the patient or family member does not authorize the procedure to be carried out by staff in training. In that case, the procedure will be supported or carried out by the pediatric orthopedic surgeon.

PROCEDUREReduction under general anesthesia

The participants will receive paracetamol at 10-15 mg/kg/dose or tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg/dose for pain control until the time of surgery. Under general anesthesia, radius closed reduction, and above-elbow casting will be performed. After the reduction maneuvers, the radius reduction is satisfactory if the translation in the coronal and sagittal planes of less than 50% and angulation in the same planes is less than 10 °. If the radius does not remain reduced, it is unstable. Unstable fractures require percutaneous fixation with K-wires, a sugar tong splint immobilization, and a nerve block. The procedures will be carried out by a 2, 3, or 4-year orthopedic resident or pediatric orthopedic fellow under the supervision of a child orthopedist. Suppose reduction is not satisfactory or the patient or parent doesn´t authorize the procedure performed by personnel in training. In that case, the procedure will be supported or carried out by the pediatric orthopedic surgeon.

Sponsors

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto de Ortopedia Infantil Roosevelt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcomes assessor will analyze the database without knowing which treatment arm each participant was allocated. He does not work in the center where the study will be carried out, nor does he contact the participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children from 5 years to 10 years * Unilateral metaphyseal distal radius fracture * Fracture shortening of 0 to 10mm or angulation of 10 ° to 20 ° in the oblique plane. (AO 23-M 2-3 or 23r-M 2-3) * Admission in the first 14 days after the fracture

Exclusion criteria

* Polytrauma: Injury Severity Score (ISS)\> 16 * Associated fracture in the same limb. * Neuromuscular pathology (e.g., cerebral palsy, spinal muscular atrophy, Duchenne disease) * Open fractures. * History of fractures, septic arthritis, or osteomyelitis in the same limb. * Neurological or vascular injury in the fractured upper limb. * Known alteration of bone metabolism (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta, rickets, osteopetrosis, skeletal dysplasias, lysosomal storage diseases). * Congenital longitudinal deficiency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper limb function6 monthsAssess upper extremity function with PROMIS Physical Function, Upper Extremity subdomain. The investigators will apply the parent-proxy version between 5 and 7 years old and the pediatric version between 8 and 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wrist range of motion3 and 6 monthsWrist passive degrees of flexion and extension measured with a goniometer aligned with the forearm axis and the second metacarpal. Pronation and supination. The investigators will ask the patient to hold a pencil vertically with the ulnar edge of the forearm on the table and the elbow flexed 90 °. The wrist is rotated medially or laterally, respectively. One arm of the goniometer is placed on the table and the other is aligned with the pencil, the degrees obtained must be subtracted from 90 °.
Ulnar variance9 monthsThe investigators will consider the ulnar variance as the distance between the most distal aspect of the metaphysis of the radius and the ulna according to the Hafner distal-distal method (DIDI).
Deformity2 weeks, 3 months and 9 monthsAngulation in the oblique plane

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with anesthetic complicationsDuring and immediately after the interventionNumber of participants with one of the following complications: Rash, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, bruising. hallucinations, toxicity, neurological injury, seizures, respiratory depression, bronchospasm, laryngospasm, cardiovascular events, malignant hyperthermia, and death.
Number of patients with reintervention0 to 9 monthsSurgical intervention in the fractured radius during the nine months after the assigned treatment due to nonunion, re-displacement, or malunion
Presence of a pressure ulcer (NPUAP scale)2 and 6 weeksPressure zones caused by plaster and classified with the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel scale. The score range from 1 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Unclassifiable lesions or those with deep tissue lesions will be reclassified to type 3 or 4 lesions after surgical debridement. For the purposes of the study, the value of the reclassification will be taken.
Patients's pain control2 and 6 weeksDays of analgesic consumption
Number of patients with pin tract infection (Dahl scale)2 and 6 weeksOnly in patients with percutaneous fixation with K-wires will the pin tract infection be classified with the Dahl scale.

Countries

Colombia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026