Older Adults
Conditions
Brief summary
Background: The early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic can be marked as a critical period in human history as it increased loneliness in people's lives. This is particularly true for the older adults who are single, living alone, and suffering from chronic diseases. However, there is insufficient existing research on associated interventions and their effectiveness. Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of an 8-week online interactive course on the loneliness, depression, social support, and quality of life (QOL) of older adults in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This pilot study, also a single-blind randomized controlled trial, collected data from a community in central Taiwan. Participants were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Subsequently, participants in the experimental group received an 8-week intensive (Monday to Friday) online interactive course, whereas those in the control group consumed 8 weeks of unidirectional online video and audio programs (such as from YouTube). Assessments were conducted both before and after the intervention, with the primary outcome being the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA), and secondary outcomes being the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form, the Inventory of Socially Supportive Behavior (ISSB) Scale, and the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Scale.
Interventions
OTHEROnline Interactive Courses
In the experimental group, after consensus was reached in the expert meeting (consisting of a doctor specializing in occupational therapy, a doctor specializing in nursing, and a doctor specializing in public health), a 5-days-per-week (Monday to Friday) 8-week intensive online interactive course was designed. The course was made accessible to the participants through a social network app (Line) from 12:00 to 20:30.
Sponsors
Yang Shang-Yu
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 88 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* (1) senior residents aged over 60 years, those who were not diagnosed with any cognitive impairment; * (2) capable of communicating in Mandarin or Taiwanese; and * (3) capable of using smartphones.
Exclusion criteria
* (1) participants who could not fully complete the 8-week intervention (or participate in the course for at least three days per week); and * (2) those who were incapable of understanding the content of the questionnaire.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA) | 10-20 minutes | The third version of UCLA compiled by Russel (1996) was used to measure loneliness. It was translated into Chinese by Chang and Yang (1999) and included 20 questions. Each question was scored on the 4-point Likert Scale, with 1: I never feel this way, 2: I rarely feel this way, 3: I sometimes feel this way, and 4: I often feel this way. The total score ranged between 20 and 80, and the higher the score, the higher the participant's degree of loneliness. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention UCLA was 0.76 and 0.78, respectively. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS-SF) | 10-20 minutes | Developed by Sheikh and Yesavage (1986), GDS-SF comprises 15 Yes or No questions, with participants scoring 1 if answering Yes or 0 if answering No. The 2-point scale (Yes/No) made the questionnaire easy to complete for the participants. The threshold of the scale was 7 points, with scores larger than 7 indicating a depression status. The total score ranged between 0 and 15, and the higher the score, the higher the degree of depression. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention GDS-SF was 0.81 and 0.82, respectively. |
| Inventory of Socially Supportive Behavior (ISSB) Scale | 10-20 minutes | Initially developed by Barrera Jr et al. (1981), ISSB was subsequently translated into Chinese and compiled into 8 questions by Ou (2013). The scale consisted of two categories, namely Emotional Support and Tangible Support. The total score of both categories represented the participant's satisfaction with social support. The scale was scored on a 5-point Likert Scale, with 1 representing Strongly disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neutral, 4: Agree, and 5: Strongly agree. The total score ranged between 8 and 40, and the higher the score, the higher the participant's satisfaction with social support. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention ISSB was 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. |
| WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Scale | 10-20 minutes | The questionnaire was composed of questions on QOL formulated by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on the commonality of various cultures. The Taiwanese version of WHOQOL-BREF included 28 questions, each scored on a 5-point Likert Scale. It was composed of four domains, namely, Physical health (7 questions), Psychological health (6 questions), Social relationships (4 questions), and Environment (9 questions). The score of an individual question ranged between 1 and 5, and after conversion, the total score of each domain ranged between 4 and 20. The higher the score, the higher the individual's QOL. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the domains Physical health, Psychological health, Social relationships, and Environment before and after the intervention was 0.82 (0.80), 0.77 (0.79), 0.76 (0.81), and 0.82 (0.84), respectively. |
Countries
Taiwan
Outcome results
None listed