Skip to content

mHealth Intervention to Support Diabetes Medication Adherence

Supporting People With Type 2 Diabetes in Effective Use of Their Medicine Through a System Comprising Mobile Health Technology Integrated With Clinical Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05006872
Acronym
DIABE-TEXT
Enrollment
742
Registered
2021-08-16
Start date
2021-10-06
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2025-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

diabetes, medication, adherence, glycaemic control, healthy lifestyle, mHealth, SMS

Brief summary

This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention based on the use of a mobile-device based system delivering automated, tailored brief text messages to offer support for medicine use and lifestyle recommendations alongside usual care to people with type 2 diabetes.

Detailed description

A list of patients registered in primary care centers of the Balearic Islands and potentially meeting the eligibility criteria will be obtained from electronic health records (EHRs). A research assistant will contact the potential participants via phone to invite them to the study and confirm eligibility. All eligible participants will complete informed consent followed by baseline assessment over the phone before randomization. Participants will be randomly allocated using a computer-generated randomization sequence. All participants will continue with their usual diabetes care including all medical visits, tests, and diabetes support programs throughout the study. In addition, the intervention group will receive the text messaging intervention. Control participants will receive usual care only. After twelve months of follow-up, all participants will complete post-intervention assessments via phone interview. Data on glycemic control (HbA1c) at baseline and post-intervention will be extracted from EHRs, as according to the protocol used for primary care providers in the Balearic Islands, patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c \>8% ) must request an HbA1c determination every six months. Results of the most recent determination will be extracted from electronic medical records. For those patients with no recorded HbA1c within the previous four months, the research assistant will contact the primary care center to arrange blood test analyses.

Interventions

Participants will receive 170 text messages in their mobile phones during twelve months.

Sponsors

Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes Balears
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Healthcare providers (doctors and nurses from the participants' health centres, do not know if their patients are participating in the study nor the group (intervention vs control) they are. Just if a patient ask them for more information related to the study or text messages, they will know about it. Also, the interviewers that evaluate and register participants data are masked until randomization. After 12 months of follow-up, the interviewers will be masked before post-intervention evaluation. The primary outcome HbA1c is an objective measure and assessors of this outcome will be blinded to treatment allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients registered in the Public Health Service of the Balearic Islands * With type 2 diabetes * At least one prescription of a glucose-lowering drug * With results of HbA1c\>8% from 6 months prior to recruitment

Exclusion criteria

* Younger than 18 years old * With insulin treatment * Participating in another research study * Not living in the Balearic Islands at some point during the study development

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)Baseline and post-intervention at 12 monthsHbA1c was extracted as percentage which is calculated following the standard formulae \[HbA1c(%)=(HbA1c(mmol/mol)+23.5)/ 10.93\] based on its concentration in blood samples. It identifies average plasma glucose concentration (1). The most recent HbA1c data registered between 6th of April and 12th of November in 2021 were extracted for all participants at baseline. At post-intervention, we extracted the most recent data which was available between 21st September 2022 and 21st February 2023.
Mean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%)Baseline and post-intervention at 12 monthsWe calculated adherence in terms of medication possession ratio (MPR), defined as the number of days with treatment as medication being dispensed from the pharmacy to the patient (numerator), out of the total days of treatment prescribed by the doctor (denominator) (2): MPR = \[Days with treatment (prescription dispensed) / Days with treatment as prescribed by the doctor\] x 100 At baseline it was calculated as the mean adherence for all the glucose lowering drugs prescribed during the 6 months previous to recruitment excluding insulin. At post-intervention it was calculated as the mean adherence for all the glucose lowering drugs prescribed during the 12 months follow-up excluding insulin.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S)Baseline and post-intervention at 12 monthsThe validated scale known as diabetes management self-efficacy scale in Spanish (DSES-S) was completed at baseline and post-intervention interviews. The scales consist of 8 Likert-type 10-point items. The score for each item was the number circled. If two consecutive numbers were circled, the lower number (less self-efficacy) was coded. If the numbers were not consecutive, the item was not scored. The final score for the scale is the mean of the eight items (points). Therefore, DSES-S scores range between 1 to 10. If more than two items were missing, we did not score the scale following instructions. Higher number indicates higher self-efficacy.
Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline and post-intervention at 12 monthsThe 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was completed at baseline and post-intervention interviews. The index score was calculated using STATA syntax code and values with the Spanish value set according to Ramos-Goñi JM et al. Information about the EQ-5D index, derived using a value set, can be presented in much the same way as the EQ VAS data, i.e. using measures of central tendency and dispersion, such as mean values and the SD (or standard error). If the data are skewed, the median values and the 25th and 75th percentiles could be presented. Note, when reporting index values, a maximum of three decimal places is usually sufficient. Index values can range between 0 to 1. Higher EQ-5D index scores mean better quality of life related to health status.
Number of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire)Baseline and post-intervention at 12 monthsNumber of participants classified as adherent based on Self-reported adherence to glucose medications was measured with a 7-items ad hoc questionnaire adapted from Chaves-Torres et al. for people with type 2 diabetes. Participants who obtained 7 points were considered adherent while the ones with \< 7 points were non-adherent.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14)Baseline and post-intervention at 12 monthsThe 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) questionnaire was registered at baseline and post-intervention. Participants were classified as low adherents (≤5), moderate adherents (6 to 9 points) or high adherents (≥10 points) according to the results obtained that can range between 1 to 14 points. After that, we joined moderate adherents with high adherents and tagged them as adherents to the Mediterranean Diet, while low adherents were considered non-adherents to the Mediterranean diet. Therefore, we presented the number of participants adherent to the Mediterranean Diet.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)Baseline and post-intervention at 12 monthsA 6-items adapted from the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (11) was registered at baseline and post-intervention. Participants were classified as having a low, moderate or high level of physical activity based on metabolic equivalent of task (METs) calculation. After that, we joined the participants that presented moderate or high level of physical activity and tagged them as adherents to Physical Activity recommendations, while low levels of Physical Activity was considered as being non-adherent to the Physical Activity Recommendations. Therefore, we presented the number of participants adherent to the Physical Activity Recommendations.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DIABE-TEXT
Participants allocated to the intervention group received 167 text messages in their mobile phones with content about diabetes management, general information about diabetes, medicines, diet and physical activity recommendations and motivational prompts to engage participants in a healthy lifestyle and a good adherence to medication plan. They also received reminders for healthcare visits, drug dispensation from the pharmacy and updated results from blood test records. DIABE-TEXT: Participants will receive 170 text messages in their mobile phones during twelve months.
371
Usual Care
Participants allocated to the control group did not receive any intervention apart from usual care.
371
Total742

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3731

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDIABE-TEXTUsual CareTotal
Age, Continuous65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)8.1 Percentage of HbA1c8.0 Percentage of HbA1c8.1 Percentage of HbA1c
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
371 participants371 participants742 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
155 Participants154 Participants309 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
216 Participants217 Participants433 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 3712 / 371
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 3710 / 371
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)

HbA1c was extracted as percentage which is calculated following the standard formulae \[HbA1c(%)=(HbA1c(mmol/mol)+23.5)/ 10.93\] based on its concentration in blood samples. It identifies average plasma glucose concentration (1). The most recent HbA1c data registered between 6th of April and 12th of November in 2021 were extracted for all participants at baseline. At post-intervention, we extracted the most recent data which was available between 21st September 2022 and 21st February 2023.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months

Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed because of losses to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DIABE-TEXTGlycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)Baseline8.1 Percentage of HbA1c
DIABE-TEXTGlycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)Post-intervention7.5 Percentage of HbA1c
Usual CareGlycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)Baseline8.0 Percentage of HbA1c
Usual CareGlycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)Post-intervention7.4 Percentage of HbA1c
Primary

Mean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%)

We calculated adherence in terms of medication possession ratio (MPR), defined as the number of days with treatment as medication being dispensed from the pharmacy to the patient (numerator), out of the total days of treatment prescribed by the doctor (denominator) (2): MPR = \[Days with treatment (prescription dispensed) / Days with treatment as prescribed by the doctor\] x 100 At baseline it was calculated as the mean adherence for all the glucose lowering drugs prescribed during the 6 months previous to recruitment excluding insulin. At post-intervention it was calculated as the mean adherence for all the glucose lowering drugs prescribed during the 12 months follow-up excluding insulin.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DIABE-TEXTMean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%)Baseline95.1 Medication possession ratio (percentage)
DIABE-TEXTMean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%)Post-intervention90.4 Medication possession ratio (percentage)
Usual CareMean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%)Baseline96.2 Medication possession ratio (percentage)
Usual CareMean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%)Post-intervention91.0 Medication possession ratio (percentage)
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)

The 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was completed at baseline and post-intervention interviews. The index score was calculated using STATA syntax code and values with the Spanish value set according to Ramos-Goñi JM et al. Information about the EQ-5D index, derived using a value set, can be presented in much the same way as the EQ VAS data, i.e. using measures of central tendency and dispersion, such as mean values and the SD (or standard error). If the data are skewed, the median values and the 25th and 75th percentiles could be presented. Note, when reporting index values, a maximum of three decimal places is usually sufficient. Index values can range between 0 to 1. Higher EQ-5D index scores mean better quality of life related to health status.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months

Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DIABE-TEXTHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline0.93 score on a scale
DIABE-TEXTHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)Post-intervention1 score on a scale
Usual CareHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline0.93 score on a scale
Usual CareHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)Post-intervention0.97 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire)

Number of participants classified as adherent based on Self-reported adherence to glucose medications was measured with a 7-items ad hoc questionnaire adapted from Chaves-Torres et al. for people with type 2 diabetes. Participants who obtained 7 points were considered adherent while the ones with \< 7 points were non-adherent.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months

Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DIABE-TEXTNumber of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire)Baseline205 Participants
DIABE-TEXTNumber of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire)Post-intervention220 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire)Baseline194 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire)Post-intervention197 Participants
Secondary

Self-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S)

The validated scale known as diabetes management self-efficacy scale in Spanish (DSES-S) was completed at baseline and post-intervention interviews. The scales consist of 8 Likert-type 10-point items. The score for each item was the number circled. If two consecutive numbers were circled, the lower number (less self-efficacy) was coded. If the numbers were not consecutive, the item was not scored. The final score for the scale is the mean of the eight items (points). Therefore, DSES-S scores range between 1 to 10. If more than two items were missing, we did not score the scale following instructions. Higher number indicates higher self-efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months

Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DIABE-TEXTSelf-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S)Baseline6.9 score on a scale
DIABE-TEXTSelf-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S)Post-intervention8.6 score on a scale
Usual CareSelf-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S)Baseline6.9 score on a scale
Usual CareSelf-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S)Post-intervention8.0 score on a scale
Other Pre-specified

14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14)

The 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) questionnaire was registered at baseline and post-intervention. Participants were classified as low adherents (≤5), moderate adherents (6 to 9 points) or high adherents (≥10 points) according to the results obtained that can range between 1 to 14 points. After that, we joined moderate adherents with high adherents and tagged them as adherents to the Mediterranean Diet, while low adherents were considered non-adherents to the Mediterranean diet. Therefore, we presented the number of participants adherent to the Mediterranean Diet.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months

Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DIABE-TEXT14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14)Baseline271 Participants
DIABE-TEXT14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14)Post-intervention171 Participants
Usual Care14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14)Baseline281 Participants
Usual Care14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14)Post-intervention169 Participants
Other Pre-specified

International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

A 6-items adapted from the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (11) was registered at baseline and post-intervention. Participants were classified as having a low, moderate or high level of physical activity based on metabolic equivalent of task (METs) calculation. After that, we joined the participants that presented moderate or high level of physical activity and tagged them as adherents to Physical Activity recommendations, while low levels of Physical Activity was considered as being non-adherent to the Physical Activity Recommendations. Therefore, we presented the number of participants adherent to the Physical Activity Recommendations.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months

Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DIABE-TEXTInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)Baseline240 Participants
DIABE-TEXTInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)Post-intervention171 Participants
Usual CareInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)Baseline245 Participants
Usual CareInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)Post-intervention194 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026