Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Conditions
Keywords
diabetes, medication, adherence, glycaemic control, healthy lifestyle, mHealth, SMS
Brief summary
This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention based on the use of a mobile-device based system delivering automated, tailored brief text messages to offer support for medicine use and lifestyle recommendations alongside usual care to people with type 2 diabetes.
Detailed description
A list of patients registered in primary care centers of the Balearic Islands and potentially meeting the eligibility criteria will be obtained from electronic health records (EHRs). A research assistant will contact the potential participants via phone to invite them to the study and confirm eligibility. All eligible participants will complete informed consent followed by baseline assessment over the phone before randomization. Participants will be randomly allocated using a computer-generated randomization sequence. All participants will continue with their usual diabetes care including all medical visits, tests, and diabetes support programs throughout the study. In addition, the intervention group will receive the text messaging intervention. Control participants will receive usual care only. After twelve months of follow-up, all participants will complete post-intervention assessments via phone interview. Data on glycemic control (HbA1c) at baseline and post-intervention will be extracted from EHRs, as according to the protocol used for primary care providers in the Balearic Islands, patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c \>8% ) must request an HbA1c determination every six months. Results of the most recent determination will be extracted from electronic medical records. For those patients with no recorded HbA1c within the previous four months, the research assistant will contact the primary care center to arrange blood test analyses.
Interventions
Participants will receive 170 text messages in their mobile phones during twelve months.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Healthcare providers (doctors and nurses from the participants' health centres, do not know if their patients are participating in the study nor the group (intervention vs control) they are. Just if a patient ask them for more information related to the study or text messages, they will know about it. Also, the interviewers that evaluate and register participants data are masked until randomization. After 12 months of follow-up, the interviewers will be masked before post-intervention evaluation. The primary outcome HbA1c is an objective measure and assessors of this outcome will be blinded to treatment allocation.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients registered in the Public Health Service of the Balearic Islands * With type 2 diabetes * At least one prescription of a glucose-lowering drug * With results of HbA1c\>8% from 6 months prior to recruitment
Exclusion criteria
* Younger than 18 years old * With insulin treatment * Participating in another research study * Not living in the Balearic Islands at some point during the study development
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) | Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months | HbA1c was extracted as percentage which is calculated following the standard formulae \[HbA1c(%)=(HbA1c(mmol/mol)+23.5)/ 10.93\] based on its concentration in blood samples. It identifies average plasma glucose concentration (1). The most recent HbA1c data registered between 6th of April and 12th of November in 2021 were extracted for all participants at baseline. At post-intervention, we extracted the most recent data which was available between 21st September 2022 and 21st February 2023. |
| Mean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%) | Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months | We calculated adherence in terms of medication possession ratio (MPR), defined as the number of days with treatment as medication being dispensed from the pharmacy to the patient (numerator), out of the total days of treatment prescribed by the doctor (denominator) (2): MPR = \[Days with treatment (prescription dispensed) / Days with treatment as prescribed by the doctor\] x 100 At baseline it was calculated as the mean adherence for all the glucose lowering drugs prescribed during the 6 months previous to recruitment excluding insulin. At post-intervention it was calculated as the mean adherence for all the glucose lowering drugs prescribed during the 12 months follow-up excluding insulin. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S) | Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months | The validated scale known as diabetes management self-efficacy scale in Spanish (DSES-S) was completed at baseline and post-intervention interviews. The scales consist of 8 Likert-type 10-point items. The score for each item was the number circled. If two consecutive numbers were circled, the lower number (less self-efficacy) was coded. If the numbers were not consecutive, the item was not scored. The final score for the scale is the mean of the eight items (points). Therefore, DSES-S scores range between 1 to 10. If more than two items were missing, we did not score the scale following instructions. Higher number indicates higher self-efficacy. |
| Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) | Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months | The 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was completed at baseline and post-intervention interviews. The index score was calculated using STATA syntax code and values with the Spanish value set according to Ramos-Goñi JM et al. Information about the EQ-5D index, derived using a value set, can be presented in much the same way as the EQ VAS data, i.e. using measures of central tendency and dispersion, such as mean values and the SD (or standard error). If the data are skewed, the median values and the 25th and 75th percentiles could be presented. Note, when reporting index values, a maximum of three decimal places is usually sufficient. Index values can range between 0 to 1. Higher EQ-5D index scores mean better quality of life related to health status. |
| Number of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire) | Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months | Number of participants classified as adherent based on Self-reported adherence to glucose medications was measured with a 7-items ad hoc questionnaire adapted from Chaves-Torres et al. for people with type 2 diabetes. Participants who obtained 7 points were considered adherent while the ones with \< 7 points were non-adherent. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) | Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months | The 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) questionnaire was registered at baseline and post-intervention. Participants were classified as low adherents (≤5), moderate adherents (6 to 9 points) or high adherents (≥10 points) according to the results obtained that can range between 1 to 14 points. After that, we joined moderate adherents with high adherents and tagged them as adherents to the Mediterranean Diet, while low adherents were considered non-adherents to the Mediterranean diet. Therefore, we presented the number of participants adherent to the Mediterranean Diet. |
| International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) | Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months | A 6-items adapted from the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (11) was registered at baseline and post-intervention. Participants were classified as having a low, moderate or high level of physical activity based on metabolic equivalent of task (METs) calculation. After that, we joined the participants that presented moderate or high level of physical activity and tagged them as adherents to Physical Activity recommendations, while low levels of Physical Activity was considered as being non-adherent to the Physical Activity Recommendations. Therefore, we presented the number of participants adherent to the Physical Activity Recommendations. |
Countries
Spain
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| DIABE-TEXT Participants allocated to the intervention group received 167 text messages in their mobile phones with content about diabetes management, general information about diabetes, medicines, diet and physical activity recommendations and motivational prompts to engage participants in a healthy lifestyle and a good adherence to medication plan. They also received reminders for healthcare visits, drug dispensation from the pharmacy and updated results from blood test records.
DIABE-TEXT: Participants will receive 170 text messages in their mobile phones during twelve months. | 371 |
| Usual Care Participants allocated to the control group did not receive any intervention apart from usual care. | 371 |
| Total | 742 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 37 | 31 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | DIABE-TEXT | Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 65 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 | 65 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 | 65 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 |
| Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 8.1 Percentage of HbA1c | 8.0 Percentage of HbA1c | 8.1 Percentage of HbA1c |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 371 participants | 371 participants | 742 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 155 Participants | 154 Participants | 309 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 216 Participants | 217 Participants | 433 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 6 / 371 | 2 / 371 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 371 | 0 / 371 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)
HbA1c was extracted as percentage which is calculated following the standard formulae \[HbA1c(%)=(HbA1c(mmol/mol)+23.5)/ 10.93\] based on its concentration in blood samples. It identifies average plasma glucose concentration (1). The most recent HbA1c data registered between 6th of April and 12th of November in 2021 were extracted for all participants at baseline. At post-intervention, we extracted the most recent data which was available between 21st September 2022 and 21st February 2023.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months
Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed because of losses to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIABE-TEXT | Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) | Baseline | 8.1 Percentage of HbA1c |
| DIABE-TEXT | Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) | Post-intervention | 7.5 Percentage of HbA1c |
| Usual Care | Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) | Baseline | 8.0 Percentage of HbA1c |
| Usual Care | Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) | Post-intervention | 7.4 Percentage of HbA1c |
Mean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%)
We calculated adherence in terms of medication possession ratio (MPR), defined as the number of days with treatment as medication being dispensed from the pharmacy to the patient (numerator), out of the total days of treatment prescribed by the doctor (denominator) (2): MPR = \[Days with treatment (prescription dispensed) / Days with treatment as prescribed by the doctor\] x 100 At baseline it was calculated as the mean adherence for all the glucose lowering drugs prescribed during the 6 months previous to recruitment excluding insulin. At post-intervention it was calculated as the mean adherence for all the glucose lowering drugs prescribed during the 12 months follow-up excluding insulin.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIABE-TEXT | Mean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%) | Baseline | 95.1 Medication possession ratio (percentage) |
| DIABE-TEXT | Mean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%) | Post-intervention | 90.4 Medication possession ratio (percentage) |
| Usual Care | Mean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%) | Baseline | 96.2 Medication possession ratio (percentage) |
| Usual Care | Mean Adherence to Antidiabetic Drugs (%) | Post-intervention | 91.0 Medication possession ratio (percentage) |
Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
The 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was completed at baseline and post-intervention interviews. The index score was calculated using STATA syntax code and values with the Spanish value set according to Ramos-Goñi JM et al. Information about the EQ-5D index, derived using a value set, can be presented in much the same way as the EQ VAS data, i.e. using measures of central tendency and dispersion, such as mean values and the SD (or standard error). If the data are skewed, the median values and the 25th and 75th percentiles could be presented. Note, when reporting index values, a maximum of three decimal places is usually sufficient. Index values can range between 0 to 1. Higher EQ-5D index scores mean better quality of life related to health status.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months
Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIABE-TEXT | Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) | Baseline | 0.93 score on a scale |
| DIABE-TEXT | Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) | Post-intervention | 1 score on a scale |
| Usual Care | Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) | Baseline | 0.93 score on a scale |
| Usual Care | Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) | Post-intervention | 0.97 score on a scale |
Number of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire)
Number of participants classified as adherent based on Self-reported adherence to glucose medications was measured with a 7-items ad hoc questionnaire adapted from Chaves-Torres et al. for people with type 2 diabetes. Participants who obtained 7 points were considered adherent while the ones with \< 7 points were non-adherent.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months
Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIABE-TEXT | Number of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire) | Baseline | 205 Participants |
| DIABE-TEXT | Number of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire) | Post-intervention | 220 Participants |
| Usual Care | Number of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire) | Baseline | 194 Participants |
| Usual Care | Number of Participants Classified as Adherent Based on Self-reported Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication (7 Items ad Hoc Questionnaire) | Post-intervention | 197 Participants |
Self-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S)
The validated scale known as diabetes management self-efficacy scale in Spanish (DSES-S) was completed at baseline and post-intervention interviews. The scales consist of 8 Likert-type 10-point items. The score for each item was the number circled. If two consecutive numbers were circled, the lower number (less self-efficacy) was coded. If the numbers were not consecutive, the item was not scored. The final score for the scale is the mean of the eight items (points). Therefore, DSES-S scores range between 1 to 10. If more than two items were missing, we did not score the scale following instructions. Higher number indicates higher self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months
Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIABE-TEXT | Self-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S) | Baseline | 6.9 score on a scale |
| DIABE-TEXT | Self-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S) | Post-intervention | 8.6 score on a scale |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S) | Baseline | 6.9 score on a scale |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy to Manage Diabetes (DSES-S) | Post-intervention | 8.0 score on a scale |
14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14)
The 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) questionnaire was registered at baseline and post-intervention. Participants were classified as low adherents (≤5), moderate adherents (6 to 9 points) or high adherents (≥10 points) according to the results obtained that can range between 1 to 14 points. After that, we joined moderate adherents with high adherents and tagged them as adherents to the Mediterranean Diet, while low adherents were considered non-adherents to the Mediterranean diet. Therefore, we presented the number of participants adherent to the Mediterranean Diet.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months
Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIABE-TEXT | 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) | Baseline | 271 Participants |
| DIABE-TEXT | 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) | Post-intervention | 171 Participants |
| Usual Care | 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) | Baseline | 281 Participants |
| Usual Care | 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS-14) | Post-intervention | 169 Participants |
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
A 6-items adapted from the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (11) was registered at baseline and post-intervention. Participants were classified as having a low, moderate or high level of physical activity based on metabolic equivalent of task (METs) calculation. After that, we joined the participants that presented moderate or high level of physical activity and tagged them as adherents to Physical Activity recommendations, while low levels of Physical Activity was considered as being non-adherent to the Physical Activity Recommendations. Therefore, we presented the number of participants adherent to the Physical Activity Recommendations.
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at 12 months
Population: The number analyzed post-intervention differs from overall number analyzed at baseline because of lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIABE-TEXT | International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) | Baseline | 240 Participants |
| DIABE-TEXT | International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) | Post-intervention | 171 Participants |
| Usual Care | International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) | Baseline | 245 Participants |
| Usual Care | International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) | Post-intervention | 194 Participants |