Skip to content

Comparison of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy and Forceps Biopsy in Lung Transplant Recipients

Comparison of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy and Forceps Biopsy in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Analysis for Acute Cellular Rejection

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05006742
Acronym
Kryo-LUTPL
Enrollment
80
Registered
2021-08-16
Start date
2021-05-07
Completion date
2024-02-28
Last updated
2024-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Transplant Failure and Rejection, Lung Transplant Rejection

Keywords

Cryobiopsy, Transbronchial Biopsy

Brief summary

CLAD is defined as loss of lung function after other factors, particularly infections have been excluded. Readily accessible diagnostic procedures to detect acute cellular rejection at the earliest possible occasion is crucial for posttransplant survival. Serial lung function tests, laboratory testing and pulmonary imaging are only clinical indicators of chronic allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Since forceps biopsy to detect acute cellular rejection in lung transplant recipients has several shortcomings, the purpose of this study is to investigate a new biopsy technique using the transbronchial cryoprobe.

Detailed description

Eventually, histopathological confirmation is indispensable to establish the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection. The current gold standard for diagnosis and grading of acute cellular rejection in order to initialize the optimal treatment, with particular regard to adjusting immunosuppression, is forceps biopsy to obtain ≥ five samples. Forceps biopsy has a reasonable risk profile in experienced centers and is performed 2, 4, 6 and 12 months posttransplant and when indicated. Given these concerns about diagnostic yield in forceps biopsy and unjustifiable risks after surgical lung biopsy, cryobiopsy has arisen as promising alternative diagnostic procedure. The value of cryobiopsy to obtain a conclusive diagnosis of ACR is discussed controversially due the lack of safety and efficacy data in lung transplant recipients

Interventions

PROCEDURECB study arm

Included patients are randomized to receive cryobiopsy

PROCEDUREFB-CB study arm

Included patients are randomized to receive forceps biopsy and cryobiopsy within the same session

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a prospective randomized trial to assess diagnostic accuracy and safety of cryobiopsy using two different transbronchial biopsy techniques. Included patients are 1:1 randomized to receive either cryobiopsy (CB study arm) or forceps biopsy and cryobiopsy within the same session (FB-CB study arm). Both, forceps biopsy and cryobiopsy are performed according to official recommendations. The biopsies will be scored for ACR according to the ISHLT criteria (A0 - A4) by 3 pathologists. A subgroup analysis in the FB-CB study arm will compare FB and CB of the same patient in order to prevent second bronchoscopy due to inconclusive histological result of FB and lung function decline being suspicious for ACR.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* routinely performed surveillance bronchoscopy and when indicated including serial FB and CB in the same session in patients wo had undergone lung transplant * male or female subject of at least 18 years of age * written informed consent after participant's information signed by patient

Exclusion criteria

* age \< 18 years * Lacking ability to form an informed consent (including impaired judgement, communication barriers) * Contraindication against bronchoscopy (e.g. co-morbidities) * INR \> 2 or Thrombocytes \< 50000 * Double antiplatelet drugs (e.g. ASS and Clopidogrel) within 7 days before biopsy * Anticoagulation with NOAK within 48 hours before biopsy * Moderate or severe pulmonary hypertension (mPAP \> 30 mmHg, RV/RA \>30 mmHg)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
diagnostic yieldup to 1 monthTo investigate the diagnostic yield of two different transbronchial lung biopsy techniques (forceps and cryobiopsy) for diagnosis of acute cellular rejection in lung transplant recipients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% of patients with treatment alteration due to the biopsy resultup to 1 monthImpact on treatment decisions depending of the pathology results
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events as assessed by pneumothorax rateup to 1 weekdata on safety
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events as assessed by bleeding eventsup to 1 weekdata on safety
interobserver agreement between 3 pathologistsup to 3 monthsThe biopsies are assessed for acute cellular rejection by three pathologists.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026