Skip to content

Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using Mobile Technology in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients

Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using Mobile Technology in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients - REMOTE Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05006105
Acronym
REMOTE
Enrollment
225
Registered
2021-08-16
Start date
2020-10-12
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2022-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Cryptogenic Stroke

Keywords

Mobile health, Prolonged cardiac monitoring, Photoplethysmography

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the added value of mobile health (mHealth) to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) early in the care path of cryptogenic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients.

Detailed description

The use of photoplethysmography (PPG)-based mHealth (with smartphone and smartwatch) is compared to the guideline-recommended insertable loop recorders (ILR) in the detection of AF in cryptogenic stroke or TIA patients.

Interventions

DEVICEseven-day ECG Holter

Participants receive a seven-day ECG Holter after hospital discharge.

DEVICE24-hour blood pressure monitor

Participants receive a 24-hour blood pressure monitor, approximately four weeks after hospital discharge.

OTHERQuestionnaire: vision of mHealth

Participants receive a questionnaire concerning their vision of mHealth, approximately four weeks after hospital discharge.

OTHERQuestionnaire: user experience & feeling of safety

Participants receive a questionnaire concerning their user experience and feeling of safety of using mHealth, after using mHealth for six months.

DEVICEInsertable loop recorder

Participants receive an insertable loop recorder, approximately six weeks after hospital discharge.

Sponsors

Hasselt University
CollaboratorOTHER
Jessa Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

The participant and care provider are not blinded for which mHealth method is used (smartphone or smartwatch), but are blinded for the mHealth results (i.e., AF detection) during the monitoring period with the mHealth application.

Intervention model description

Group 1 uses PPG-based mHealth with a smartphone; two times a day, a spot-check measurement is taken; and in case of symptoms, additional measurements can be taken. Group 2 uses PPG-based mHealth with a smartwatch, this results in semi-continuous measurements that are performed automatically.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA * The patient or its legal representative is willing to sign the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of AF or atrial flutter * Life expectancy of less than one year * Not qualified for ILR insertion * Indication or contraindication for permanent oral anticoagulants (OAC) at enrolment * Untreated hyperthyroidism * Myocardial infarction or coronary bypass grafting less than one month before the stroke onset * Presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and it is or was an indication to start OAC according to the European Stroke Organization guidelines * Inclusion in another clinical trial that will affect the objectives of this study * Not able to understand the Dutch language * Patient or partner not in possession of a smartphone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AF detection with mHealth versus ILR - PercentageAfter 6 months of having an ILR inserted and using mHealth.Percentage of patients with AF detected

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AF detection with mHealth versus ILR - Time to first AF detectionBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).Time to first AF detection
AF detection with mHealth versus ILR - FrequencyBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).Frequency of AF episodes
AF detection with mHealth versus ILR - DurationBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).Duration of AF episodes
AF detection with ILR - PercentageAfter 12 months of having an ILR inserted.Percentage of patients with AF detected
Correlation between baseline characteristics and AF detectionBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).Baseline characteristics include comorbidities, results of standard of care in-hospital stroke examinations and scores, relevant in-hospital therapy
Correlation between follow-up characteristics and AF detectionBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).Follow-up characteristics include changes in therapy, number of relevant readmissions, mortality and healthcare-related costs
User experience and feeling of safety questionnaireAfter 6 months of having an ILR inserted and using mHealth.Questionnaire with a 7 point Likert scale

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactDavid Verhaert, Dr.
david.verhaert@zol.be+3289 32 70 91
Backup ContactFemke Wouters
femke.wouters@zol.be

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026