HIV, Non Communicable Diseases
Conditions
Keywords
HIV, Non Communicable Diseases, WHO-PEN
Brief summary
This mixed-methods formative research study aims to adapt the WHO Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions (WHO-PEN) approach for the Zambian public health system, and pilot test an adapted, streamlined, and task-shifted package of integrated HIV Noncommunicable Disease (NCD) services, collectively called TASKPEN.
Detailed description
Using local data and implementation science theories WHO-PEN will be adapted for Zambia, and TASKPEN developed to focus on addressing challenges faced by persons living with HIV (PLHIV) who have cardio-metabolic complications related to HIV or its treatment (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia). TASKPEN aims to improve detection and management of these complications. Formative research activities for objective 1 include focus group discussions (FGDs), surveys and interviews with key stakeholders, which will include in-depth interviews (IDIs) with patients. Objective 2 launches the TASKPEN pilot and fully task-shifts the TASKPEN package to non-physician healthcare workers (NPHWs) and integrates it within the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) -supported HIV service delivery platform. A mix of IDIs, FGDs, key informant interviews, and patient and implementation surveys with implementation actors to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and other implementation outcomes
Interventions
TASKPEN is the name of the package of implementation strategies proposed by the investigators that are intended to deliver the WHO PEN intervention in routine HIV clinical practice settings in Zambia. TASKPEN has five components which will be the subject of stakeholder consultation and adaptation in this formative research protocol. The package of integrated HIV/NCD services includes: 1. WHO PEN protocols, algorithm, & training materials adapted for Zambia 2. Access to cardio-metabolic condition screening & laboratory monitoring 3. Non communicable disease-focused electronic medical record module 4. Integrated non-communicable/HIV care (one stop shop for services) 5. Strengthened non-communicable disease (NCD) medication supply chain, including multi-month dispensing (MMD)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Objective 1 Focus group discussion participants/implementation survey participants: Inclusion: * 18 years of age or older * non-physician professional or lay/peer health care worker (HCW) involved with HIV and/or NCD service delivery. Key Informant Interview (KII) participants: * 18 years of age or older * a senior Ministry of Health (MOH) policy maker or health official working at national level in Zambia involved in managing, coordinating, and/or overseeing health services for non-communicable diseases in Zambia. In-depth interview participants: * emancipated HIV-infected adults 18 years of age or older have a documented cardio-metabolic condition Exclusion: * any potential IDI, FGD, or KII participant if they are unwilling or unable to provide informed consent. Objective 2: Cross-sectional assessments: Inclusion: * HIV-infected * aged 18 years and older * seeking care at either of the two ACHIEVE-supported pilot sites who are screened for and/or found to have evidence of one or more of the cardio-metabolic conditions or risk factors. Nested cohort participants: Inclusion: * documented HIV infection * aged 18 years or older * have one or more cardio-metabolic conditions or risk factors: * obesity (defined as BMI \> 30 kg/m\^2); * any current tobacco smoking; * hypertension as defined by WHO PEN (i.e., systolic blood pressure (SBP) = 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) = 90 mmHg); * diabetes mellitus as defined by WHO PEN (i.e. random plasma glucose = 11.1 mmol/L, fasting plasma glucose = 7 mmol/L, and/or haemoglobin A1c = 48 mmol/mol); * prediabetes (defined as having impaired fasting glucose of 6.1 to 6.9 mmol/L, impaired glucose tolerance with a two-hour, post-oral glucose tolerance test glucose =7.8 mmol/L but \<11.1 mmol/L and a fasting plasma glucose \<7.0 mmol/L, and/or haemoglobin A1c 42 to 48 mmol/mol); 6) dyslipidaemia (defined as total cholesterol \>4 mmol/L or low density lipoprotein =6 mmol/L); and/or 7) personal history or medication use for heart disease, heart failure, stroke, or other cardio-metabolic complication (including but not limited to coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral vascular disease). IDI participants: * HIV-infected * 18 years of age who were enrolled in the nested cohort and had documented exposure to the TASKPEN intervention at a pilot site. FGD participants: * 18 years of age or older * a non physician health care worker (NPHW) or community health worker (CHW)/ lay health provider involved with TASKPEN or integrated HIV/NCD service delivery generally familiar with HIV and/or NCD service delivery at their facility. KII participants: * 18 years of age or older * a facility-level antiretroviral therapy (ART) or out-patient department (OPD) clinic manager/ in-charge or policy maker at district, provincial, or national level in Zambia; and generally familiar with HIV and/or NCD-related issues in their community.
Exclusion criteria
For the nested cohort component, investigators will exclude: * adults who have no documented evidence of having established HIV care at the sites. * people unlikely to remain at the site to the completion of the study follow-up. * any potential IDI, FGD, or KII participant if they are unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Percent of Participants With Dual HIV and Blood Pressure Control | Baseline to 6 months | Measured by an HIV RNA level of \<1000 copies per mL on the most recent measure and systolic blood pressure \<140 mmHg and/or diasystolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg. Dual control defined as HIV control (i.e., viral load \<1,000 c/mL for those with a documented viral load + evidence of 6MMD for those with missing viral load) + Hypertension control (SBP\<140 mmHg AND DBP\<90 mmHg) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Trained Healthcare Providers (Intervention Reach) | During 2 weeks prior to initiation of TASKPEN | Number of healthcare providers working at the pilot clinic antiretroviral therapy (ART), differentiated service delivery (DSD), and outpatient departments who were trained in the implementation of the TASKPEN intervention package. |
| Changes in HIV Disease Control, as Measured by the Percent of Patient Participants With HIV RNA Suppression (Defined as <1,000 Copies/mL) | Baseline to 6 months | Measured by the percent of patient participants with HIV RNA suppression (defined as \<1,000 copies/mL) |
| Change in Intervention Appropriateness | Baseline to 6 months | The Intervention appropriateness measure (IAM) among healthcare providers. The minimum score is 1 and maximum is 5. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness. |
| Number of Clinics That Adopted the Intervention (Intervention Adoption) | 6 months | Adoption measured based on Reach Evaluation Adoption Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) which are implementation-oriented and empirically supported frameworks for adapting, introducing, and evaluating evidence-based interventions in routine practice settings. The number of facilities initiating TASKPEN intervention integrated care at approximately 6 months after TASKPEN introduction. |
| Change in Intervention Feasibility | Baseline to 6 months | Measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) among Healthcare providers. The minimum score is 1 and maximum is 5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility. |
| Intervention Cost Per Patient | 6 months | Measured by cost per patient and reported in Zambian Kwacha. The analysis focused on the expenditures paid out of pocket for HIV and hypertension care. These data were collected from one site only (Chilenje). |
| Change in Intervention Acceptability | Baseline to 6 months | Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention measure (AIM) among health care providers. The minimum score is 1 and maximum is 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability. |
Countries
Zambia
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
28 Healthcare Providers and 1101 patient participants were enrolled and 11 were excluded from the analysis. This 'mini' stepped wedge pilot had 2 clinic clusters to establish approach feasibility. In a stepped wedge fashion, participants at both clinics were surveyed at baseline and then one site was randomly selected to receive the intervention for 3 months. A midline survey was then conducted and the second site was switched to the intervention before an endline survey 3 months later.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Standard of Care Patients During the control period, participants receive the current standard of care (SOC) in Zambia. Under the SOC in Zambian health facilities, the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of cardio-metabolic NCDs are generally unavailable in the clinical departments where most PLHIV seek and receive health services (i.e., ART and DSD clinics), and typically are only offered for hypertension in the general outpatient medical settings that provide urgent care-like services. Under the SOC, health worker capacity to diagnose and manage cardio-metabolic NCDs, including among non-physicians and community health workers, is severely limited and not protocolized like HIV services. | 634 |
| TASKPEN Patients During the intervention period, participants receive TASKPEN intervention services.
TASKPEN: The package of integrated HIV/NCD services:
1. WHO PEN protocols, algorithm, & training materials adapted for Zambia
2. Access to cardio-metabolic condition screening & laboratory monitoring
3. Non communicable disease-focused electronic medical record module
4. Integrated non-communicable/HIV care (one stop shop for services)
5. Strengthened non-communicable disease (NCD) medication supply chain, including multi-month dispensing (MMD) | 456 |
| Standard of Care Healthcare Providers Healthcare Providers employed at either of the clinics who participated in study surverys. | 20 |
| TASKPEN Healthcare Providers Healthcare Providers employed at either of the clinics who participated in study surverys. | 8 |
| Total | 1,118 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | TASKPEN Patients | Standard of Care Patients | Total | Standard of Care Healthcare Providers | TASKPEN Healthcare Providers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous Participants | 45 years | 46 years | 45 years | — | — |
| Age, Customized Participant age between 18-29 | 32 Participants | 41 Participants | 73 Participants | — | — |
| Age, Customized Participant age between 30-44 | 185 Participants | 246 Participants | 431 Participants | — | — |
| Age, Customized Participant age between 45-59 | 187 Participants | 284 Participants | 471 Participants | — | — |
| Age, Customized Participant age between 60 and older | 52 Participants | 63 Participants | 115 Participants | — | — |
| Alcohol Consumption No | 270 Participants | 346 Participants | 616 Participants | — | — |
| Alcohol Consumption Yes | 186 Participants | 288 Participants | 474 Participants | — | — |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) Healthy weight | 246 Participants | 257 Participants | 503 Participants | — | — |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) Missing data | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | — | — |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) Obese | 56 Participants | 146 Participants | 202 Participants | — | — |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) Overweight | 107 Participants | 178 Participants | 285 Participants | — | — |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) Underweight | 41 Participants | 53 Participants | 94 Participants | — | — |
| Education None | 55 Participants | 45 Participants | 100 Participants | — | — |
| Education Primary | 238 Participants | 276 Participants | 514 Participants | — | — |
| Education Secondary plus | 163 Participants | 313 Participants | 476 Participants | — | — |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 456 Participants | 634 Participants | 1118 Participants | 20 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| History of Dyslipidemia Don't know | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | — | — |
| History of Dyslipidemia No | 454 Participants | 631 Participants | 1085 Participants | — | — |
| History of Dyslipidemia Yes | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | — | — |
| History of Hypertension No | 327 Participants | 483 Participants | 810 Participants | — | — |
| History of Hypertension Yes | 129 Participants | 151 Participants | 280 Participants | — | — |
| History of Type II Diabetes Don't know | 1 Participants | 8 Participants | 9 Participants | — | — |
| History of Type II Diabetes No | 445 Participants | 603 Participants | 1048 Participants | — | — |
| History of Type II Diabetes Yes | 10 Participants | 23 Participants | 33 Participants | — | — |
| Marital Status Married or cohabitating | 234 Participants | 281 Participants | 515 Participants | — | — |
| Marital Status Never married | 25 Participants | 63 Participants | 88 Participants | — | — |
| Marital Status Separated or Divorced or Widowed | 197 Participants | 290 Participants | 487 Participants | — | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 456 Participants | 634 Participants | 1118 Participants | 20 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Zambia | 456 Participants | 634 Participants | 1118 Participants | 20 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Participants Female | 320 Participants | 468 Participants | 788 Participants | — | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Participants Male | 136 Participants | 166 Participants | 302 Participants | — | — |
| Time on ART 10 Years or more | 258 Participants | 354 Participants | 612 Participants | — | — |
| Time on ART 5-9 Years | 111 Participants | 141 Participants | 252 Participants | — | — |
| Time on ART Less Than 5 Years | 87 Participants | 139 Participants | 226 Participants | — | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 636 | 1 / 465 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 158 / 636 | 222 / 465 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 636 | 0 / 465 |
Outcome results
Change in Percent of Participants With Dual HIV and Blood Pressure Control
Measured by an HIV RNA level of \<1000 copies per mL on the most recent measure and systolic blood pressure \<140 mmHg and/or diasystolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg. Dual control defined as HIV control (i.e., viral load \<1,000 c/mL for those with a documented viral load + evidence of 6MMD for those with missing viral load) + Hypertension control (SBP\<140 mmHg AND DBP\<90 mmHg)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Eleven patient participants with incomplete data were excluded.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Change in Percent of Participants With Dual HIV and Blood Pressure Control | 52 percentage of participants |
| TASKPEN | Change in Percent of Participants With Dual HIV and Blood Pressure Control | 60 percentage of participants |
Change in Intervention Acceptability
Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention measure (AIM) among health care providers. The minimum score is 1 and maximum is 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Change in Intervention Acceptability | 4.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| TASKPEN | Change in Intervention Acceptability | 4.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
Change in Intervention Appropriateness
The Intervention appropriateness measure (IAM) among healthcare providers. The minimum score is 1 and maximum is 5. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Change in Intervention Appropriateness | 4.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| TASKPEN | Change in Intervention Appropriateness | 4.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
Change in Intervention Feasibility
Measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) among Healthcare providers. The minimum score is 1 and maximum is 5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Change in Intervention Feasibility | 4.66 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| TASKPEN | Change in Intervention Feasibility | 4.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
Changes in HIV Disease Control, as Measured by the Percent of Patient Participants With HIV RNA Suppression (Defined as <1,000 Copies/mL)
Measured by the percent of patient participants with HIV RNA suppression (defined as \<1,000 copies/mL)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Data are reported for all patient participants with viral load test results available.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Changes in HIV Disease Control, as Measured by the Percent of Patient Participants With HIV RNA Suppression (Defined as <1,000 Copies/mL) | 85 percentage of participants |
| TASKPEN | Changes in HIV Disease Control, as Measured by the Percent of Patient Participants With HIV RNA Suppression (Defined as <1,000 Copies/mL) | 89 percentage of participants |
Intervention Cost Per Patient
Measured by cost per patient and reported in Zambian Kwacha. The analysis focused on the expenditures paid out of pocket for HIV and hypertension care. These data were collected from one site only (Chilenje).
Time frame: 6 months
Population: These data were collected only at one study site. These data reflect out-of-pocket expenditures for participants living with HIV and at least one non-communicable disease co-morbidity.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Intervention Cost Per Patient | 352.53 Kwacha (ZMW) | Standard Error 23.81 |
| TASKPEN | Intervention Cost Per Patient | 287.5 Kwacha (ZMW) | Standard Error 101.02 |
Number of Clinics That Adopted the Intervention (Intervention Adoption)
Adoption measured based on Reach Evaluation Adoption Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) which are implementation-oriented and empirically supported frameworks for adapting, introducing, and evaluating evidence-based interventions in routine practice settings. The number of facilities initiating TASKPEN intervention integrated care at approximately 6 months after TASKPEN introduction.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Number of Clinics That Adopted the Intervention (Intervention Adoption) | 1 Clinics |
| TASKPEN | Number of Clinics That Adopted the Intervention (Intervention Adoption) | 1 Clinics |
Number of Trained Healthcare Providers (Intervention Reach)
Number of healthcare providers working at the pilot clinic antiretroviral therapy (ART), differentiated service delivery (DSD), and outpatient departments who were trained in the implementation of the TASKPEN intervention package.
Time frame: During 2 weeks prior to initiation of TASKPEN
Population: The number of healthcare workers analyzed reflects the overall total number who were trained at the clinics and may include overlap from the Healthcare Providers enrolled to participate in the study survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Number of Trained Healthcare Providers (Intervention Reach) | 29 Participants |
| TASKPEN | Number of Trained Healthcare Providers (Intervention Reach) | 60 Participants |