Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Disorders, Complication of Surgical Procedure, Emergencies, Laparoscopic Surgery, Long-term Effects of Cancer Treatment
Conditions
Keywords
Laparoscopic surgery, Emergency surgery, Colorectal
Brief summary
This is a randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter trial to compare post-operative complications and long-term results between open and laparoscopic technique in emergency colorectal surgery.
Detailed description
Laparoscopic technique in elective colorectal surgery has been shown to be advantageous for patients compared to open technique. However, the feasibility and potential benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in emergency setting has not been evaluated sufficiently. The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic and open technique in emergency colon resections. Primary outcome is the immediate recovery after operation and secondary outcome is long-term overall and cancer-specific survival.
Interventions
Operation
Operation
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
This is a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* all patients in need of emergency colon resection
Exclusion criteria
* age \< 18 year * trauma patients * reoperations * acute pancreatitis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| postoperative morbidity | 30 days | Postoperative morbidity evaluated by Clavien-Dindo classification |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical site infections | 30 days | Surgical site infections, superficial and deep |
| Long-term Survival | 5 years | Long-term overall and cancer-specific survival |
Countries
Finland
Contacts
Päijät Häme Central Hospital