Skip to content

Trial Comparing Immediate Versus Extended Release Tacrolimus; Reducing Calcineurin Inhibitor Related Toxicity in Lung Transplantation Patients

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Immediate Versus Extended Release Tacrolimus; Reducing Calcineurin Inhibitor Related Toxicity in Lung Transplantation Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05001074
Acronym
REVOLUTION
Enrollment
145
Registered
2021-08-11
Start date
2020-07-28
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2023-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Transplant; Complications

Keywords

lung transplantation, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, extended release tacrolimus, LCP tacrolimus, immediate release tacrolimus

Brief summary

Lung transplantation is a life-saving option in patients with end-stage lung disease. The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors has significantly improved long-term outcome in lung transplantation. The most frequently used calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance therapy is immediate release tacrolimus, dosed twice daily, which has shown to reduce both acute and chronic rejection. However, a drawback to the administration of tacrolimus is its toxicity. Especially progressive renal toxicity, new onset diabetes and hypertension contribute to the high cardiovascular burdon in this patient group. Since a few years an once daily extended release tacrolimus has been introduced in solid organ transplantation. The advantage of extended release tacrolimus is its prolonged release and higher bioavailability than other tacrolimus formulations. This result in lower peaks, more stable serum levels over 24 hours, and less fluctuation of blood concentrations. Long-term toxicity outcome of extended release tacrolimus after lung transplantation has not been studied so far. Therefore the potential benefit of exteded release tacrolimus in de novo and stable post-lung transplant recipients should be investigated.

Detailed description

Lung transplantation is a life-saving option in patients with end-stage lung disease. The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) has significantly improved long-term outcome in lung transplantation. The most frequently used CNI as maintenance therapy is immediate release tacrolimus, dosed twice daily, which has shown to reduce both acute and chronic rejection. However, a drawback to the administration of tacrolimus is its toxicity. Especially progressive renal toxicity, new onset diabetes and hypertension contribute to the high cardiovascular burdon in this patient group. In lung transplant recipients the incidence of severe renal impairment, new onset of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia is 53,9%, 40%, 80% and 40,3% post lung transplantation. Tremor is one of the most common CNI induced neurological toxic effect, besides polyneuropathy, headaches, insomnia, vertigo, dysesthesia and reduced cognitive ability. These complications are, among others, attributed to high peak serum tacrolimuslevels, whereas the effectiveness of the drug is determined by the area under the curve. In general lung transplant recipients have higher peak and trough levels when compared to other solid organ transplant recipients and therefore potentially experience more severe toxic side effects. Since a few years an once daily extended release tacrolimus has been introduced in solid organ transplantation. The advantage of extended release tacrolimus is its prolonged release and higher bioavailability than other tacrolimus formulations. This result in lower peaks, more stable serum levels over 24 hours, and less fluctuation of blood concentrations. In addition, for an equal overall systemic tacrolimus exposure a 30% lower dosage is needed for extended release tacrolimus when compared to other formulations. In kidney and liver transplantation, extended release tacrolimus is safe and effective. Langone et al demonstrated in an enriched population of kidney transplant patients with tremor, that extended release tacrolimus improved hand tremor compared to immediate release tacrolimus. Long-term toxicity outcome of extended release tacrolimus after lung transplantation has not been studied so far. Therefore the potential benefit of exteded release tacrolimus in de novo and stable post-lung transplant recipients should be investigated.

Interventions

de novo cohort: participants are randomised for extended release tacrolimus or immediate release tacrolimus direct post-lung transplantation Conversion cohort: participants are randomised for extended release tacrolimus or immediate release tacrolimus when \>1 year post-lungtransplantation and with stable graft function

DRUGImmediate release tacrolimus

de novo cohort: participants are randomised for extended release tacrolimus or immediate release tacrolimus direct post-lung transplantation Conversion cohort: participants are randomised for extended release tacrolimus or immediate release tacrolimus when \>1 year post-lungtransplantation and with stable graft function

Sponsors

Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Heleen Grootjans
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

De novo cohort, 2 arms: de novo lung transplant recipients. Conversion cohort, 2 arms: stable lung transplant recipients

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Single or bilateral lung transplantation * On twice daily tacrolimus with stable trough levels in target range * Participant in the TransplantLines biobank study in the UMCG Additional criteria for Conversion cohort: * At least one year after lung transplantation with a stable clinical course and lung function * eGFR \>30ml/min\*1.73m2 calculated with the CKD-EPI formula

Exclusion criteria

* Administration of mTOR inhibitors; everolimus, sirolimus * Quadruple immunosuppression * Renal transplantation * The subject has any disease or condition that might interfere with completion of this study or reaching the primary endpoint (e.g., life expectancy of \<3 years, renal replacement therapy at start study)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
renal function: absolute change in eGFR2 yearsabsolute change in eGFR absolute change in eGFR change in eGFR at 2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
renal function: 40% eGFR reduction2 years40% eGFR reduction
renal function: 50% eGFR reduction2 years50% eGFR reduction
renal function:end stage kidney disease2 yearsend stage kidney disease
hypertension2 yearsIncidence of inadequate regulated or new onset of hypertension
diabetes mellitus2 yearsIncidence of inadequate glycemic control of preexisting diabetes mellitus or new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT)
Infections2 yearsIncidence of infections
graft function2 yearsAcute graft dysfunction is a clinical diagnoses, with or without histological confirmation, and indictation for rejection treatment such as methylprednisolon. Chronic graft dysfunction is defined according to the ISHLT guidelines, as a persistent decline (≥20%) in measured FEV1 value from baseline.
neurological function: tremor2 yearsIncidence of or change in pre-existing hand tremor by using the validated Fahn-Tolosa-Martin (FTM) tremor rating scale (grades of tremor 0-4, in which 0 indicated no tremor and 4 severe tremor)
neurological function: polyneuropathy2 yearsIncidence of or change in pre-existing polyneuropathy
neurological function: sleep quality2 yearsIncidence of or change in sleep quality by using validated questionnaire: Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
neurological function: cognitive functioning2 yearsIncidence of or change in cognitive functioning by using validated questionnaire: the Cognitive Functioning Questionnaire (CFQ)
quality of life score2 yearschange in SF36 score
pharmacogenetic2 yearsexplorative endpoints: effects of well known variances in CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 transporter function on tacrolimus metabolism (resulting in so-called slow and fast tacrolimus metabolisers) on long-term tacrolimus renal toxicity by using absolute eGFR change
Malignancies2 yearsIncidence of malignancies

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactHeleen Grootjans
h.grootjans@umcg.nl0031503616161
Backup ContactTji Gan
c.t.gan@umcg.nl0031503616161

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026