Type 2 Diabetes
Conditions
Keywords
Hypoglycaemia
Brief summary
This study aims to investigate the utility of a combination of structured nurse led intervention and the use of Freestyle libre in adults with type 2 diabetes who have suffered an episode of severe hypoglycaemia in terms of mortality, unscheduled healthcare contacts and quality of life.
Detailed description
It is increasingly recognised that hypoglycaemia carries risk to individuals with all forms of diabetes. Research has shown high rate of mortality in those with type 2 diabetes following an episode of severe hypoglycaemia and a previous pilot trial conducted in the UK suggested that this could be improved by a structured nurse led intervention aimed at modifying glycemic therapy to avoid hypoglycaemia, instigating regular blood glucose monitoring and providing education to participants on common triggers for hypoglycaemia and how to avoid them. In this trial, the investigators will randomise individuals with type 2 diabetes who have suffered an episode of severe hypoglycaemia requiring emergency service call out to two arms. One arm will receive standard of care/treatment as usual and the other will receive a structured nurse led intervention as well as the use of a flash glucose monitoring system, Freestyle libre. Active participation in the trial for both arms will be a total of twelve months (with the main intervention months 0-6.) Participants electronic records will be analysed for death and unscheduled healthcare contacts for a total of two years after recruitment. The primary outcome measure is mortality between groups. Secondary outcomes include the use of estimated HbA1c (a variable produced by the freestyle libre device) compared to laboratory HbA1c, quality of life measures, effects on glycemic control and the number of unscheduled healthcare contacts.
Interventions
DEVICEFreestyle libre
A glucose sensor (flash) which measures interstitial blood glucose every 15 minutes or on demand.
OTHERNurse led structured intervention - hypoglycaemia education and diabetes treatment modification modification
An education programme surrounding avoidance of hypoglycaemia at baseline. Regular review (weeks 2, 4, 12 and 24) and adjustment of diabetes medications based on freestyle libre data.
Sponsors
Abbott Diabetes Care
University of Leeds
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Masking description
Unable to mask participants and trailists due to study design.
Intervention model description
Randomised controlled trial (not blinded due to study design)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Aged \>18 * Confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes * Suffered an episode of severe hypoglycaemia requiring ambulance call out * Able to provide informed written consent
Exclusion criteria
* A form of diabetes mellitus which is not type 2 or the diagnosis is uncertain * Currently pregnant * Dialysis dependent renal failure * Unable to provide informed written consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality at 2 years | 2 years | Rates of death between groups at 2 years |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular mortality at 1 year | 1 year | Mortality from a cardiovascular cause at 1 year |
| Cardiovascular mortality at 2 years | 2 years | Mortality from a cardiovascular cause at 2 years |
| Number of unscheduled healthcare contacts | 2 years after randomisation | Number of unscheduled healthcare contacts (emergency services, hospital attendances, primary care attendances) 1 year prior to randomisation and 2 years after |
| Comparison between estimated HbA1c and laboratory HbA1c | 6 months | A comparison between estimated HbA1c (freestyle libre generated) and laboratory HbA1c values across the whole study cohort at 0 and 6 months |
| All-cause mortality at 1 year | 12 months | Mortality at 12 months from randomisation |
| Scores from Diabetes distress scale | Tested at 0 and 6 months | A questionnaire which assessed the emotional burden diabetes has on the participant. 4 different domains are tested across 17 questions. An overall score is calculated (each question is ranked 1-6 by participants) and the total score is divided by 17. The higher the score (1-6) the more diabetes distress the participant is under. Scores are also calculated across each domain. These are 1) emotional burden 2) Physician associated distress 3) regimen associated distress 4) interpersonal distress |
| Scores from diabetes quality of life scale (DQOL) | Tested at 0 and 6 months | This is a questionnaire with 15 questions filled in by participants. Each question is ranked 1-5 with a score of 5 conveying the worst score. Scores therefore range from 15 to 75 with a score of 75 indicating very poor quality of life as a result of diabetes and 15 very good. |
| Scores from treatment satisfaction scale (DTSQc) | Tested at 0 and 6 months | This is a questionnaire assessing participant satisfaction with the treatment of their diabetes. It comprises 8 questions with each scored from 3 to negative 3. A score of 3 on a question indicates very good satisfaction whereas negative 3 that the participant is most dissatisfied. Therefore a maximum score of 24 is possible with a low score of negative 24. The higher the score, the more satisfied the participant is with their diabetes treatment. |
| Scores from GOLD score | Tested at 0 and 6 months | A 1-7 scale which asks participants how likely they are to recognise hypoglycaemia. 7 indicates they have severe hypoglycaemia awareness and 1 that they are fully hypoglycaemic aware. Therefore the higher the score, the more hypoglycaemic unawareness the participant perceives themself as having. |
| Change from baseline in HbA1c | 6 months | Change from baseline HbA1c at 6 months between both groups |
Countries
United Kingdom
Contacts
Primary ContactRamzi A Ajjan, PHD
Outcome results
None listed