Skip to content

Effect of Bacillus Coagulans in Adults With With Functional Constipation

Effect of Bacillus Coagulans on Various Symptoms and Fecal Microbial Diversity in Adults With With Functional Constipation: a Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04997187
Enrollment
80
Registered
2021-08-09
Start date
2021-07-20
Completion date
2022-04-15
Last updated
2026-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Constipation - Functional

Brief summary

The investigators conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the effects of Bacillus coagulans on various symptoms and fecal microbial diversity in adults with with functional constipation for 12 weeks.

Detailed description

A previous study has indicated that Bacillus coagulans provided control of abdominal pain, less discomfort during defecation, and a more normalized defecation style, especially in adults with with functional constipation. Therefore, the investigators conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the effects of Bacillus coagulans various symptoms and fecal microbial diversity in adults with with functional constipation for 8 weeks; the safety of the compound are also evaluated. The Investigators examine constipation visual analogue scale, Bristol Stool Form Scale type 3 & 4 ratio, visual analogue scale for irritable bowel syndrome (VAS-IBS) questionnaire score, IBS-symptom severity scale, IBS quality-of-life questionnaire score, fecal microbial diversity at baseline, as well as after 8 weeks of intervention. Eighty adults were administered either 400 mg of Bacillus coagulans or a placebo each day for 8 weeks.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBacillus coagulans group

Bacillus coagulans 400 mg/day for 12 weeks

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTControl group

Placebo 400 mg/day for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- function constipation by Romes criteria IV

Exclusion criteria

* Abnormal liver or renal function (more than twice the normal upper limit of the research institute) * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (\>160 mg/dL of fasting blood sugar) * Uncontrolled hypertension (\>160/100 mmHg) * Uncontrolled thyroid diseases. * History of serious cerebro-cardiovascular diseases or cancer such as angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months * History of structural abnormalities of colon within 4 year * History of medication for probiotics and psychiatric diseases such as severe depression, schizophrenia, drug intoxication. * Alcohol abuser * Allergic reaction to this test food * Those who participated in other drug clinical trials within 1 month from the screening date. * Severe gastrointestinal symptoms such as heartburn and indigestion * Those who are pregnant, lactating, or plan to become pregnant during the clinical trial * Those who are judged to be unsuitable by the PI for other reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
constipation visual analogue scale8 weeksusing visual analogue scale (100 mm). The minimum value was 0 mm and the maximum value was 100 mm, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) type 1 & 2 ratio (%)8 weeksusing Bristol Stool Form Scale. The minimum value was 0% and the maximum value was 100%, and higher scores mean a better outcome.
visual analogue scale for irritable bowel syndrome8 weeksusing visual analogue scale (100 mm). The minimum value was 0 mm and the maximum value was 100 mm, and higher scores mean a better outcome.
irritable bowel syndrome-symptom severity scale8 weeksusing IBS-Symptom Severity Scale questionnaire. The minimum value was 0 score and the maximum value was 500 score and higher scores mean a worse outcome.
irritable bowel syndrome-quality-of-life8 weeksusing IBS-QOL questionnaire. The minimum value was 0 score and the maximum value was 5 score and higher scores mean a better outcome.
fecal microbial diversity8 weeksusing gut microbiome analysis

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026