Skip to content

Acute and Long-term Impact of Cancer Treatment on Head and Neck Cancer Patients: FIT4TREATMENT

Acute and Long-term Impact of Cancer Treatment on Quality-of-life, Physical and Cognitive Function of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04996147
Acronym
F4T
Enrollment
21
Registered
2021-08-09
Start date
2019-06-01
Completion date
2020-03-03
Last updated
2021-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Keywords

Head and Neck Neoplasms, Acute adverse events, Long-term adverse events, Quality of life, Cognitive function, Physical function

Brief summary

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is the 6th most common cancer. Most cases are diagnosed in locally advanced stages, with treatment involving multimodal approach with combinations of radiotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy. The aggressive nature of HNSCCs and treatment modalities are associated with important acute and late toxicities that often promote temporary or definitive treatment interruption and may compromised the capability to tolerate subsequent treatments. Thus, the aim of this study is to analyze the acute and long-term impact of cancer treatment on quality of life, physical and cognitive function of HNSCC patients diagnosed with a locally advanced disease.

Detailed description

Potential cases will be identified at the multidisciplinary head and neck group meeting. If the case meets eligibility an informed consent will be presented to the patient. Interested participants will be scheduled for baseline assessment before the beginning of treatment (M0). At the end of CRT patients will be submitted to a second assessment (M1). Follow-up assessments will occur 16th to 18th weeks after the treatment is completed (M2). Patients proposed to surgery or induction chemotherapy will also be submitted to an additional assessment before the beginning of CRT (Mc / Mic).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University Institute of Maia
CollaboratorOTHER
Associacao de Investigacao de Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Patients older than 18 years. * Diagnosis of locally advanced head and neck cancer (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx), stage III-IVB. * Proposed for primary treatment with curative intent - surgery or induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or CRT alone.

Exclusion criteria

* Synchronous tumors or other comorbidities with associated uncontrolled symptoms. * Inability to provide informed consent. * Expected inability to fulfil the propose schedule and follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life (acute)Change of global quality of life score from baseline to the end of treatmentGlobal quality of life score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents a high level of functioning)
Quality of life (long-term)Change of global quality of life score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedGlobal quality of life score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents a high level of functioning)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Social functioning (acute)Change of body mass index from baseline to the end of treatmentSocial functioning score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents a high level of functioning)
Social functioning (long-term)Change of body mass index from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedSocial functioning score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents a high level of functioning)
Body composition (acute)Change of body mass index from baseline to the end of treatmentBody mass index, evaluated by bioelectrical impedance (BMI kg/m\^2).
Body composition (long-term)Change of body mass index from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedBody mass index, evaluated by bioelectrical impedance (BMI kg/m\^2).
Cognitive function (acute)Change of MoCA score from baseline to the end of treatmentEvaluated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive (MoCA score range between 0 and 30, a score of 26 or over is considered to be normal).
Cognitive function (long-term)Change of MoCA score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedEvaluated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive (MoCA score range between 0 and 30, a score of 26 or over is considered to be normal).
Dysphagia (acute)Change of EAT-10 score from baseline to the end of treatmentSeverity of dysphagia assessed by Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10 total score ranges from 0 to 40, with a score ≥ 3 indicative of dysphagia)
Dysphagia (long-term)Change of EAT-10 score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedSeverity of dysphagia assessed by Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10 total score ranges from 0 to 40, with a score ≥ 3 indicative of dysphagia)
Nutritional status (acute)Change of PG-SGA total score from baseline to the end of treatmentEvaluated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA range from 0-35 with a higher score reflecting a greater risk of malnutrition).
Nutritional status (long-term)Change of PG-SGA total score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedEvaluated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA range from 0-35 with a higher score reflecting a greater risk of malnutrition).
Fatigue (acute)Change of fatigue score from baseline to the end of treatmentFatigue score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents high level of symptomatology / problems)
Handgrip maximal isometric muscle strength (long-term)Change of muscle strength from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedMeasured with manual dynamometers (Kgf).
Quadriceps maximal isometric muscle strength (acute)Change of muscle strength from baseline to the end of treatmentMeasured with manual dynamometers (Kgf).
Quadriceps maximal isometric muscle strength (long-term)Change of muscle strength score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedMeasured with manual dynamometers (Kgf).
Sit-to-stand test (acute)Change of repetitions from baseline to the end of treatmentSit-to-stand test during 30 seconds
Sit-to-stand test (long-term)Change of repetitions from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedSit-to-stand test during 30 seconds
Physical function (acute)Change of distance from baseline to the end of treatment6 minutes walking test (meters).
Physical function (long-term)Change of distance from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed6 minutes walking test (meters)
Progression free survival2 years follow-upDefined as the time from the beginning of treatment to the date of first progression or death (whichever occurs first) and will be censored at last follow-up date if the patient does not have the event. A progression (local, regional or distant) will be assumed accordingly to the imaging evaluation and/or histopathologic confirmation.
Overall survival2 years follow-upDefined as the time from the beginning of treatment to the date of death from any cause, for patients who do not die, it will be censored at their last follow-up date.
Capability of tolerating subsequent treatments2 years follow-upDefined as the proportion of patients that complete the first cycle of the first line palliative chemotherapy after a documented progression (considering all patients with a formal indication).
Handgrip maximal isometric muscle strength (acute)Change of muscle strength from baseline to the end of treatmentMeasured with manual dynamometers (Kgf).
Fatigue (long-term)Change of fatigue score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completedFatigue score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents high level of symptomatology / problems)

Countries

Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026