Skip to content

Feasibility of Mobile-CT-Assisted Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Lung Lesion

Mobile-CT-Assisted Bronchoscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04995172
Enrollment
72
Registered
2021-08-06
Start date
2021-04-19
Completion date
2024-11-27
Last updated
2024-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasm

Brief summary

This study investigates whether using a mobile-CT-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) during a bronchoscopy procedure will better enable the study staff to reach the lung tumor, perform a biopsy, and obtain a diagnosis. One method that doctors use for diagnosing lung tumors is bronchoscopy guided by an X-ray machine (called fluoroscope). Though much better guidance could be provided with a CT scanner when compared to the fluoroscope, the standard CT equipment is very large, fixed in a radiology room, and difficult to use with bronchoscopy. Mobile CT imaging systems may more easily and effectively perform the same tasks of the standard CT imaging in the bronchoscopy room, offering better guidance than the standard fluoroscope.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE I. To determine the added value of mobile-CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) for the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules defined as the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy with radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) and 2-D Fluoroscopy is non-diagnostic (lesion is not reached or rapid-onsite cytology is non-diagnostic) and diagnosis is obtained after utilizing mobile-CT assistance. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Describe the navigational yield of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules. II. Describe the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules. III. Describe the mobile-CT (M-CT) added navigational yield. IV. Describe the sensitivity for malignancy of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy and its increase (if any) provided by mobile-CT assistance. V. Describe anatomical and procedural characteristics that can influence navigational and diagnostic yield (tumor location, tumor characteristics -solid, semisolid-, air-bronchus sign, biopsy tool, relationship between biopsy tool/tumor). VI. Describe procedure duration. VII. Describe time required to obtain mobile CT scans VIII. Describe fluoroscopy time and estimate radiation dose to the patient. IX. Describe procedural complications. OUTLINE: Patients undergo RP-EBUS bronchoscopy per standard of care. If the study staff cannot reach the target lesion or is unable to determine a diagnosis, patients undergo bronchoscopy using mobile CT imaging. Patients' medical records are also reviewed for up to 6 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREComputed Tomography

Undergo mobile CT-assisted bronchoscopy

OTHERElectronic Health Record Review

Patients' medical records are reviewed

Undergo radial probe EBUS

Sponsors

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of 18 years of age or older undergoing bronchoscopy for diagnosis of a peripheral lung lesion from 1 to 3.5 cm in diameter located in the outer 2/3 of the lung fields

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patients who cannot tolerate raising both arms above their head (position for obtaining mobile-CT images) * Patients with any contraindication for general anesthesia (e.g., severe and active coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \< 1 liter, uncontrolled hypertension, increased intracranial pressure, history of intolerance to general anesthesia) * Dementia or other severe cognitive impairment causing inability to understand or consent to the procedure and study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The added value of mobile-computed tomography (CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB)Up to 6 monthsDefined as the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy with thin or ultrathin scope, radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) and 2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopy is non-diagnostic (lesion is not reached or rapid-onsite cytology is non-diagnostic) and diagnosis is obtained after utilizing mobile-CT assistance. Descriptive statistics (mean standard deviation \[SD\] or median interquartile range \[IQR\], frequency \[%\]) will be used to summarize patient characteristics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic yield of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodulesUp to 6 monthsDiagnostic yield of SOC and diagnostic yield of SOC + M-CT along with their 95% CIs will be estimated.
Mobile-CT (M-CT) added navigational yieldUp to 6 monthsM-CT added diagnostic yield in a subgroup with non-diagnostic subjects by SOC will be estimated along with its 95% CI. M-CT added diagnostic yield in a subgroup with non-diagnostic subjects by SOC will be estimated along with its 95% CI. Two-sided exact binomial test will be used to test if diagnostic yield of SOC + M-CT is significantly different from 0.2 in the subgroup.
Sensitivity for malignancy of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy and its increase (if any) provided by mobile-CT assistanceUp to 6 monthsSensitivity for malignancy of SOC and sensitivity for malignancy of SOC + M-CT will be estimated, considering final pathology as the gold standard test.
Anatomical and procedural characteristics that can influence navigational and diagnostic yieldUp to 6 monthsAnatomic and procedural characteristics that are associated with navigational and diagnostic yield will be evaluated by multivariate logistic regression models. A p-value of less than 0.05 will indicate a statistical significance.
Navigational yield of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodulesUp to 6 monthsNavigational yield for standard of care (SOC) will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Time required to obtain mobile CT scansUp to 6 monthsWill be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).
Fluoroscopy timeUp to 6 monthsWill be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).
Radiation dose to the patientUp to 6 monthsWill be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).
Procedural complicationsUp to 6 monthsComplications will be tabulated.
Procedure durationUp to 6 monthsWill be summarized by mean (standard deviation \[SD\]) or median (interquartile range \[IQR\]).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026