Skip to content

Effect of Kinesiotaping and Night Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndome

Comparison of Short-term Effect of the Kinesiotaping and Night Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04993703
Enrollment
45
Registered
2021-08-06
Start date
2021-08-10
Completion date
2022-02-20
Last updated
2022-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome, night splinting, kinesiotaping, physiotherapy and rehabilitation

Brief summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) which is defined as a symptomatic compression neuropathy of the median nerve at the level of the wrist. Different types of splints are used for improving the function and decreasing the pain intensity and symptoms in the rehabilitation of patients with CTS. However effectiveness of treatment by taping has never been investigated in physiotherapy and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term effect of conventional physiotherapy only, and also kinesio taping and night splinting in patients with CTS.

Detailed description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) which is defined as a symptomatic compression neuropathy of the median nerve at the level of the wrist.It is considered as the most common disabling neuromuscular condition of the upper extremities. Night splints are used in conjunction with the conservative intervention to improve the function and decrease the pain intensity and paresthesia in the rehabilitation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. However effectiveness of treatment by kinesiotaping has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term effect of conventional physiotherapy only, and also kinesio taping and night splinting in addition to conventional physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of patients with CTS.

Interventions

OTHERKinesiotaping

A total of 20 sessions physiotherapy sessions including hot pack, ultrasound, kinesiotaping and exercise program (tendon and nerve gliding exercises=2 times per day 3 sets of ten repetitions) will be applied.times per day 3sets of ten repetitions) will be applied.

A total of 20 sessions physiotherapy sessions including hot pack, ultrasound, night splinting and exercise program (tendon and nerve gliding exercises=2 times per day 3 sets of ten repetitions) will be applied.

OTHERControl Group

A total of 20 sessions physiotherapy sessions including hot pack, ultrasound and exercise program (tendon and nerve gliding exercises=2 times per day 3 sets of ten repetitions) will be applied.

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* This study included patients with moderate CTS, confirmed by electroneurographic examination. * did not recruit any treatment (including physiotherapy or surgical release)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients suffer from the thenar muscle atrophy. * Patients with mild CTS.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
functional impairmentfunctional impairment will be recorded at baseline and 4-week follow-upfunctional impairment will be assessed by using Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. The score consisted of two sub-scales; The Symptom Severity Scale including 11 questions and The Functional Capacity Scale including 8 questions. Each scale score is calculated by the average values of the questions. The scores vary between 1-point to 5-point. High score indicates severe symptoms and impaired functional capacity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain intensitychange from baseline to 4-week follow-up will be recordedpain intensity will be assessed by using Visual Analog Scale at rest, activity and at night. All patients were asked to mark their pain level that corresponds to their pain intensity on the line between 0=no pain and 100=the worst pain imaginable.
paresthesiachange from baseline to 4-week follow-up will be recordedParesthesia will be assessed by using Visual Analog Scale at rest, activity and at night. All patients were asked to mark their paresthesia level that corresponds to their paresthesia intensity on the line between 0=no paresthesia and 100=the worst paresthesia imaginable.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026