Procedural Skill. Learning
Conditions
Keywords
Debriefing, Procedural skills, Satisfaction, Reflection, Critical thinking
Brief summary
Purposes: This study was set out to measure the effectiveness of constructive debriefing on procedural skills and satisfaction of nursing students in the low-fidelity context in comparison to traditional debriefing. Method: The randomized controlled (Parallel double blinded) trial design was used. Participant: Out of 51 approached, 34 students were selected from the list of participants by a data collector using simple random sampling technique. Following, block randomization was applied using Microsoft Excel to create two equivalent (n=17) groups i.e. experimental and non-experimental. Setting: The study was conducted in private college of nursing Islamabad Pakistan Intervention: The experimental group received constructive debriefing and non-experimental group received the traditional debriefing. The data were collected using suctioning, sterile dressing skills checklist, and debriefing reflection subscale of Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale.
Interventions
Constructive debriefing was applied to an interventional group Traditional debriefing was applied on noninterventional group
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
\- Students who were enrolled in the Adult Health Nursing (AHN) course were included in the study
Exclusion criteria
* Studentsnts who were repeating the course and were absent for two or more days during skills demonstration and signing off were excluded
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| learning scores | 8months | learning scores of participant |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| satisfaction level | 8months | measure satisfaction level of participant |
Countries
Pakistan