Skip to content

Evaluation of Protective Pulmonary Ventilation by Pulmonary Ultrasound

Pulmonary Ultrasound to Evaluate Protective Lung Ventilation in Obese Patients With Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Impact

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04991727
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-08-05
Start date
2021-08-21
Completion date
2023-12-23
Last updated
2021-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Assessment

Keywords

lung ultrasound, Protective pulmonary ventilation, Postoperative pulmonary complications

Brief summary

Peri - operative ultrasonography was used to evaluate the effects of protective lung ventilation on the postoperative lungs of obese patients.The purpose of this study was to apply ultrasound lung ventilation area score to the monitoring of pulmonary complications in patients with postoperative obesity.To verify the reliability and practicability of perioperative lung ultrasound quantitative scoring.

Detailed description

Ultrasound lung ventilation area score was applied to monitor the pulmonary complications of patients after obesity operation to verify the perioperative period. The reliability and practicability of quantitative lung ultrasound score to clarify the effect of protective lung ventilation under perioperative pulmonary ultrasound monitoring on obesity patients.To guide the management of mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia and the prevention and treatment of postoperative pulmonary complications

Interventions

BEHAVIORALrecruitment maneuvers

Immediately after endotracheal intubation is completed First RM (pulmonary retraction), maintain pressure at 40cmH2O for 30s, and then Mechanical ventilation was maintained with 7cmH2O PEEP, and the RMS was repeated every 30 minutes until the end of surgery

Sponsors

General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* enrollment of patients aged 18 years or above; * Eligible adult patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I to IV * undergoing elective or expedited nonurgent, noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* patient refusal; * morbid obesity (BMI \>40 kg/ m²); * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status categories IV-V; * previous intrathoracic procedure; * severechronic obstructive pulmonary disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s \<30% of the predicted value; * a contraindication to radial artery cannulation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lung ultrasound scoringin the morning of the first dayFour signs were used in lung ultrasound scoring Lung ultrasound score: N (0): pleural line and A line, less than 3 B lines; B1 (1 mark): More than 3 B line; B2 (2 points): Fuse line B; C (3 points): Signs of lung consolidation. The higher the score is, the worse the pulmonary ventilation status is. When scoring, the sign with the greatest severity is taken as the score value of the examination area. There are 12 examination areas in both lungs, so we have a LUS The score is between 0 and 36

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Results of arterial blood gas analysisentering the operating room, in the morning of the first day ,the second day , the third day after surgeryPCO2
Mechanical ventilation parameterentering the operating room, in the morning of the first day ,the second day , the third day after surgerypeak inspiratory pressure

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026