Skip to content

Euploid Rate of Blastocyst Derived From PPOS VS Antagonist Protocol

A Randomized Control Trial to Compare the Euploid Rate of Blastocyst Between the Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol and the Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Undergoing Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04989348
Enrollment
240
Registered
2021-08-04
Start date
2021-08-04
Completion date
2024-02-20
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

IVF

Keywords

ppos, antagonist protocol, PGT-A, Euploid Rate of Blastocyst

Brief summary

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) involves multiple follicular development, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer after fertilization. Despite recent advances in ovarian stimulation, the method of assisted fertilization and improved culture conditions, the implantation potential of embryos remains around 30-35% for a long time. Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists have been used in IVF to prevent the LH surge and the premature ovulation and are given in the luteal phase of the preceding cycle or in the follicular phase of the treatment cycle i.e. the long GnRH agonist. GnRH antagonists are now commonly used during IVF. In addition to the advantage of its simplicity, the use of antagonist is associated with a substantial reduction in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome without reducing the chance of achieving live birth when compared with the long agonist protocols. \[1\] Progestin can inhibit the pituitary LH surge during ovarian stimulation and various studies show progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective in blocking the LH surge in IVF \[2-5\]. More and more centers in China are using PPOS because this regimen appears simpler and cheaper. Because of its negative effect on the endometrium, fresh transfer of embryos is not possible and elective freezing of all embryos is required. PPOS protocol is indicated in women who freeze all embryos because of various reasons such as undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy or the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. One prospective non-randomized study comparing the PPOS vs short GnRH agonist protocol shows similar oocytes retrieved between the two protocols, and the incidence of premature LH surge, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rates shows no significant difference. \[2\] A recent randomized trial comparing medroxyprogesterone and GnRH antagonist in an oocyte donation program showed a similar number of mature oocytes but reported lower ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate of recipients of oocyte donors who had received medroxyprogesterone in IVF \[6\]. However, the oocyte recipients in that trial were not randomized. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude the effect of progestin used in IVF on the pregnancy outcomes. It is possible that the PPOS protocol may have an adverse effect on the euploid rate of embryos, leading to a lower live birth rate.

Detailed description

The inability to assess embryo quality and select those with the highest potential for implantation on the basis of morphology has led to the concept of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). PGT-A involves biopsy of a few cells from an embryo and assessment of the chromosome copy numbers. While PGT-A cannot create a healthy embryo or improve the health of an embryo, it provides a method of selecting embryos with a normal number of chromosomes for transfer. This in turn has the potential to increase the chance of having a healthy live birth and reduce the risk of miscarriage or an abnormal fetus caused by an abnormal number of chromosomes. Aneuploidy screening of all chromosomes is necessary to determine whether an embryo is chromosomally normal. As the turnaround time of PGT-A with next generation sequencing is about a week, it is not possible to transfer blastocyst in the stimulated cycle. All blastocysts will be frozen post biopsy and the blastocysts with normal genetic makeup will be thawed and replaced in a subsequent menstrual cycle. Cryopreservation of blastocysts and replacing the frozen blastocysts after thawing in subsequent cycles become a common practice with vitrification as the cryopreservation method. A systematic review (7) of the clinical utility of PGT-A with comprehensive chromosome screening found that three small randomised controlled trials demonstrated benefit in young and good prognosis patients in terms of clinical pregnancy rates and the use of single embryo transfer. This randomized trial aims to compare the euploid rate of blastocysts between PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocols in patients undergoing PGT-A.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol

Women will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger or

PROCEDUREProgestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol

Women will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or Duphaston 10mg bd from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger.

Sponsors

The University of Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 43 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age of women \<43 years at the time of ovarian stimulation for IVF 2. PGT-A indicated for advanced maternal age (\>40 years), recurrent miscarriage (\>=2 or 3 consecutive miscarriage and repeated implantation failure (\>=4 embryos replaced or \>=2 blastocysts replaced without success)

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of a functional ovarian cyst with E2\>100 pg/mL 2. use of donor eggs/sperm, 3. Presence of hydrosalpinx or endometrial polyp which is not surgically treated 4. moderate or severe endometriosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
euploid blastocyst formation rate2 monthsEuploid blastocysts per injected MII oocyte

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of blastocysts suitable for biopsy and freezing1 monthblastocysts after extented culture
clinical pregnancy of the first FETan average of 3 monthspresence of intrauterine gestational sac on ultrasound
implantation ratean average of 3 monthsnumber of gestational sacs per embryo transferred
ongoing pregnancy of the first FETan average of 6 monthsviable pregnancy beyond gestation 10 weeks
live birth rate of the first FETaverage of 1 yearA baby born alive after 22 weeks gestation
Number of mature oocytes1 monthM2 oocytes
Serum AMH level1 monthhormone level
Serum estradiol level1 monthhormone level
Serum progesterone level1 monthhormone level
incidence of premature LH surge1 monthLH ≥10 IU/l
Serum FSH level1 monthhormone level

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026