Skip to content

A Study of Bermekimab for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

A Phase 2a/2b, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo and Active Comparator-controlled, Double-Blind, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Bermekimab (JNJ-77474462) for the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04988308
Acronym
LYRA
Enrollment
151
Registered
2021-08-03
Start date
2021-10-12
Completion date
2022-11-23
Last updated
2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of bermekimab in participants with moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS).

Detailed description

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease of unclear etiology that affects 1 percent (%) to 4% of the general population. JNJ-77474462 (bermekimab) is a recombinant human immunoglobulin G1 kappa (IgG1k) monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds with high affinity and selectivity for human interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha) and is an effective blocker of IL-1 alpha biological activity. IL-1 alpha is a key mediator of sterile inflammatory responses. Skin is a significant reservoir of preformed IL-1 alpha, and it has been postulated that IL-1 alpha may play a role in the pathophysiology of multiple inflammatory skin disorders, including HS. Part 1 of this study contains 4 study periods: up to 6 weeks screening period (Period 1), 16-week placebo-controlled period (Period 2), 16-week cross over period (Period 3), and 4-week safety follow-up (Period 4). Part 2 of this study also contains 4 study periods: up to 6 weeks screening period (Period 1), 12-week placebo-controlled period (Period 2), 20-week cross over period (Period 3), and 4-week safety follow up (Period 4). Safety will be assessed by adverse events (AEs), serious adverse event (SAEs), physical examinations, vital signs, electrocardiograms, clinical safety laboratory assessments, allergic reaction, injection-site reactions, and tuberculosis evaluations. The total duration of study participation will be up to 42 weeks.

Interventions

Bermekimab will be administered subcutaneously.

DRUGAdalimumab

Adalimumab will be administered subcutaneously.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be administered subcutaneously.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) for at least 1 year (365 days) prior to the baseline visit as determined by the investigator through participant interview and/or review of the medical history * Have Hurley Stage II or Hurley Stage III HS as determined by the investigator at screening and baseline visits * Have HS lesions present in at least 2 distinct anatomic areas (examples include but are not limited to left and right axilla; or left axilla and left inguinocrural fold) at screening and baseline visits * Have a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 at the screening and baseline visit * Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study and for 90 days after the last administration of study intervention

Exclusion criteria

* Has a current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances * Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (that is, unstable angina, rapid atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months * Has or has had herpes zoster within the 2 months before screening * Has a transplanted organ (with exception of a corneal transplant greater than \[\>\] 3 months before the first administration of study intervention) * Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to bermekimab or adalimumab or its excipients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response-50 (HiSCR50) at Week 16Week 16HiSCR50 was defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule counts (AN count) with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 16Week 16HiSCR90 was defined as at least 90% reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule counts (AN count) with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Change from baseline in the AN count as Week 16 was reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Abscess at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Change from baseline in number of abscess at Week 16 was reported.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistula at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Change from baseline in number of draining fistula at Week 16 was reported. Draining fistula was defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodules at Week 16 was reported. Inflammatory nodules arise from inflamed blood vessels (vasculitis) or adipose tissue (panniculitis).
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 16Week 16HiSCR75 was defined as at least 75% reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule counts (AN count) with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16Baseline, Week 16The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. The participant's HS was assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1), or mild activity (2) and with at least 2-grade improvement relative to baseline at Week 16 were reported.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16Baseline, Week 16HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours with a score range from 0 (no symptom experience) to 10 (worst possible symptom experience). A total symptom score also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period. Change from baseline in HS-related pain symptom score in the past 24 hours based on HSSD was reported.
Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeeks 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36Serum concentration of bermekimab was reported. As per planned analysis, this outcome measure was analyzed in a single arm for participants who received bermekimab from Week 0 to Week 36.
Number of Participants With Antibodies to BermekimabFrom baseline up to Week 36Number of participants with antibodies to bermekimab was reported. As per planned analysis, this outcome measure was analyzed in a single arm for participants who received bermekimab from Week 0 to Week 36.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) at Week 16Baseline up to Week 16IHS4 was a dynamic severity assessment of HS. IHS4 score was arrived at by the number of nodules (multiplied by 1) plus the number of abscesses (multiplied by 2) plus the number of draining tunnels (multiplied by 4). A total score of 3 or less signifies mild, 4-10 signifies moderate and 11 or higher signifies severe disease. Higher scores indicate more severity.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

As per change in planned analysis, Part 2 of this study was not conducted due to early termination because interim analysis 1 efficacy results met the prespecified futility criteria related to the primary endpoint. Hence, data for Part 2 and some secondary efficacy outcome measures (Parts 1 and 2) were not reported in this results summary.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)
Participants received placebo as subcutaneous (SC) injection from Week 0 through Week 15 and then participants received bermekimab 1050 milligrams (mg) as SC injection at Week 16 in Part 1.
50
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-36)
Participants received bermekimab 1050 mg (3\*350 mg) and 1 placebo as SC injection at Week 0 followed by bermekimab 1050 mg (3\*350 mg) as SC injection at Week 1 and every week thereafter through Week 16 in Part 1. Participants who received bermekimab 1050 mg (3\*350 mg) at Week 16 entered into active treatment + safety follow up (FU) period and received bermekimab 1050 mg as SC injection weekly through Week 36 in Part 1.
51
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)
Participants received adalimumab 160 mg (4\*40 mg) as SC injection at Week 0 and 3 placebo SC injections at Week 1 followed by adalimumab 80 mg (2\*40 mg) as SC injection at Week 2 and 3 placebo SC injections at Week 3. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg (1\*40 mg) SC injection and 2 placebo SC injections at Week 4 and every week thereafter through Week 16 in Part 1.
50
Total151

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Active Treatment+Safety F-U (Week 17-36)Lost to Follow-up000331
Active Treatment+Safety F-U (Week 17-36)Other000101014
Active Treatment+Safety F-U (Week 17-36)Study terminated by sponsor000562
Active Treatment+Safety F-U (Week 17-36)Withdrawal by Subject000321
Placebo Controlled Period (Weeks 0-16)Death001000
Placebo Controlled Period (Weeks 0-16)Lost to Follow-up440000
Placebo Controlled Period (Weeks 0-16)Other10914000
Placebo Controlled Period (Weeks 0-16)Study terminated by sponsor643000
Placebo Controlled Period (Weeks 0-16)Withdrawal by Subject244000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-36)Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Total
Age, Continuous36.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.67
35.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.55
36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants4 Participants7 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants41 Participants38 Participants121 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants5 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants5 Participants10 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants8 Participants3 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants5 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants32 Participants32 Participants101 Participants
Region of Enrollment
AUSTRALIA
4 Participants4 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
CANADA
5 Participants5 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
10 Participants10 Participants12 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
JAPAN
2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
NETHERLANDS
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
POLAND
7 Participants8 Participants5 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
20 Participants21 Participants21 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants28 Participants25 Participants83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants22 Participants25 Participants68 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 511 / 500 / 280 / 300 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 5031 / 5122 / 5012 / 2812 / 3011 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 501 / 514 / 500 / 281 / 301 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response-50 (HiSCR50) at Week 16

HiSCR50 was defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule counts (AN count) with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response-50 (HiSCR50) at Week 1637.1 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response-50 (HiSCR50) at Week 1637.1 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response-50 (HiSCR50) at Week 1657.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Antibodies to Bermekimab

Number of participants with antibodies to bermekimab was reported. As per planned analysis, this outcome measure was analyzed in a single arm for participants who received bermekimab from Week 0 to Week 36.

Time frame: From baseline up to Week 36

Population: The immunogenicity analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of bermekimab and who had at least 1 sample obtained after their first dose of bermekimab for the detection of antibodies to bermekimab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Number of Participants With Antibodies to Bermekimab16 Participants
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16

HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours with a score range from 0 (no symptom experience) to 10 (worst possible symptom experience). A total symptom score also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period. Change from baseline in HS-related pain symptom score in the past 24 hours based on HSSD was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16-1.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.461
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16-0.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.374
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16-1.96 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.326
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) at Week 16

IHS4 was a dynamic severity assessment of HS. IHS4 score was arrived at by the number of nodules (multiplied by 1) plus the number of abscesses (multiplied by 2) plus the number of draining tunnels (multiplied by 4). A total score of 3 or less signifies mild, 4-10 signifies moderate and 11 or higher signifies severe disease. Higher scores indicate more severity.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) at Week 16-5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.38
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) at Week 16-10.14 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.36
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) at Week 16-12.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.15
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Abscess at Week 16

Change from baseline in number of abscess at Week 16 was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Abscess at Week 16-0.86 AbscessStandard Deviation 1.9
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Abscess at Week 16-0.83 AbscessStandard Deviation 3.071
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Abscess at Week 16-1.46 AbscessStandard Deviation 2.333
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistula at Week 16

Change from baseline in number of draining fistula at Week 16 was reported. Draining fistula was defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistula at Week 16-0.04 fistulasStandard Deviation 1.915
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistula at Week 16-1.00 fistulasStandard Deviation 1.626
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistula at Week 16-0.96 fistulasStandard Deviation 1.575
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16

Change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodules at Week 16 was reported. Inflammatory nodules arise from inflamed blood vessels (vasculitis) or adipose tissue (panniculitis).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16-3.64 inflammatory nodulesStandard Deviation 5.258
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16-4.48 inflammatory nodulesStandard Deviation 7.689
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16-5.79 inflammatory nodulesStandard Deviation 4.306
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16

Change from baseline in the AN count as Week 16 was reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16-4.50 Abscess and inflammatory noduleStandard Deviation 5.088
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16-5.31 Abscess and inflammatory noduleStandard Deviation 8.594
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16-7.25 Abscess and inflammatory noduleStandard Deviation 4.774
Secondary

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 16

HiSCR75 was defined as at least 75% reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule counts (AN count) with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 1625.7 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 1625.7 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 1640.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 16

HiSCR90 was defined as at least 90% reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule counts (AN count) with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 1614.3 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 1617.1 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 1622.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16

The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. The participant's HS was assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1), or mild activity (2) and with at least 2-grade improvement relative to baseline at Week 16 were reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0) or almost active (1)25.7 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0)11.4 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0), or or almost active (1), or mild activity (2)28.6 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0) or almost active (1)25.7 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0)17.1 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Bermekimab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0), or or almost active (1), or mild activity (2)28.6 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0)20.6 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0), or or almost active (1), or mild activity (2)38.2 Percentage of participants
Part 1: Adalimumab (Week 0-16)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16HS-IGA scores of inactive (0) or almost active (1)38.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Bermekimab

Serum concentration of bermekimab was reported. As per planned analysis, this outcome measure was analyzed in a single arm for participants who received bermekimab from Week 0 to Week 36.

Time frame: Weeks 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of bermekimab and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated at each specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 00.00 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek151.36 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 20.354
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 478.46 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 43.897
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 873.14 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 37.583
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 1272.45 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 39.185
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 1661.81 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 42.092
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 2074.68 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 59.3
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 2489.75 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 50.94
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 2866.30 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 57.219
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 3234.53 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 36.16
Part 1: Placebo (Week 0-16)Serum Concentration of BermekimabWeek 364.63 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 7.576

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026