Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
Conditions
Keywords
GEP NET, Neuroendocrine tumor, Nutritional status
Brief summary
It is well known that the prevalence of malnutrition or risk of malnutrition in cancer patients is high, as well as its impact on different parameters such as hospitalization, survival or response to certain treatments. In patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET), due to their heterogeneity and longer survival, it is expected that the prevalence of malnutrition is probably underdiagnosed, as well as the existence of a negative impact on different parameters (quality of life, survival). So far, the studies carried out on nutrition and NET are very scarce and none has been carried out so far in Spain. Before being able to carry out nutritional intervention studies on these patients, it is necessary to know the reality of the nutritional status of patients with NETs in Spain. The main motivation for the NUTRIGETNE study is to evaluate the epidemiological status of nutrition in NETs in the spanish population. In addition to know the epidemiological picture, it is intended to study the nutritional status from different points of view: analytical, clinical, anthropometric, etc. Besides, the study of nutritional status will allow us to closely monitor the patients who have a higher risk of malnutrition and to propose early interventions for those, as well as the impact of their nutritional status on different parameters: survival, hospitalization, quality of life or responses to the treatments. NUTRIGETNE is a cross-sectional, open and multicenter study in which the nutritional status of patients with GEP NET in Spain will be evaluated.
Detailed description
NUTRIGETNE is a cross-sectional, open and multicenter study in which the nutritional status of patients with GEP NET in Spain will be evaluated. It is planned to include 400 GEP NET patients. Patients will be included consecutively when visiting the corresponding health centers for outpatient visits or hospitalization. The study comprises 3 stages with a total duration of 10 to 40 days for the participation of each subject in the study: Screening visit, First day (day 0): The initial screening will take place on the first day the patient visits the hospital. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be reviewed to assess the eligibility of the patient. The implications of the study will be explained to the patient and the informed consent will be signed. Visit for assessment of nutritional status (days 0-10): taking a medical history, complete physical examination including anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance (BIA) and dynamometry, as well as laboratory analysis. The evaluation of the nutritional status will be carried out by a registered nutritionist, specialized nurse or specialist doctor (variable depending on the characteristics of the center). Data collection (day 10-40): collection of analytical, anthropometric, BIA, dynamometry and clinical results and introduction into the electronic case report form (eCRF). After the end of recruitment and database lock, all data will be subsequently analyzed and presented when applicable through study reports and scientific communications.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients diagnosed with a gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor by histopathological study. * Legally capable patients ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years of age. * Patients who have signed the informed consent for this study as specified in section 10.3. * Patients in active treatment: active treatment is considered to be those patients in an advanced stage and in any type of medical treatment (somatostatin analogues, molecular therapies, chemotherapy, radionuclides...), or locoregional therapies. Note: Decision was taken to treat the patient with an specific treatment prior and independently of patient inclusion in this non interventional study.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients \<18 or \> 80 years of age. * Female patients that are currently pregnant. * Patients with a gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor lacking an histopathological diagnosis. * Patients in palliative treatment or terminal stage. * Patients who have not signed the informed consent or any situation or condition that compromises the giving of patient voluntary informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of Malnutrition in GEP NET | Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature) | Percentage of GEP NET patients suffering from malnutrition in Spain according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), which was convened by several of the major global clinical nutrition societies. Malnutrition diagnosis is based on three phenotypic criteria (non-volitional weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake or assimilation, and inflammation or disease burden). Patients having one or more phenotypic and etiologic criteria are considered malnourished. |
| Risk of Malnutrition in GEP NET | Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature) | Percentage of GEP NET patients at risk of suffering from malnutrition in Spain according to Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). Three independent criteria are used by MUST to determine the overall risk for malnutrition: current weight status using BMI, unintentional weight loss, and acute disease effect. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Phase Angle | Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature) | Body muscle mass calculated by bioimpedance and measured by Phase Angle. Here we report the phase angle, a marker of muscle mass and function, measured in degrees. Higher degrees of phase angle indicates greater cell integrity and function, reflecting healthier and more robust muscles. |
| Body Mass Index | Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature) | Body mass index (BMI) is defined as a a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women |
| Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature) | Score to measure risk malnutrition in adult patients based on patient history and physical examination alone. The score has 3 levels: A (low malnutrition risk) to C (high malnutrition risk) |
| Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) Rates | Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature) | Scale to evaluate the malnutrition in adult patients. It is based in the assessment of BMI, weight loss in the last 3-6 months and acute disease effects. The score ranges from 0 (low malnutrition risk to 6 (high malnutrition risk). |
| Body Fat | Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature) | Body fat mass calculated by bioimpedance |
Countries
Spain
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| GEP NET GEP NET patients in Spain | 399 |
| Total | 399 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | GEP NET |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62 years |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) Score 0 | 213 Participants |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) Score 1 | 125 Participants |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) Score ≥ 2 | 20 Participants |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) Score Unknown | 41 Participants |
| Functionality Functioning | 98 Participants |
| Functionality Not functioning | 295 Participants |
| Functionality Unknown | 6 Participants |
| Metastasis at inclusion 0 | 15 Participants |
| Metastasis at inclusion 1 | 227 Participants |
| Metastasis at inclusion ≥ 2 | 157 Participants |
| Most common sites of metastasis Liver Metastasis present | 332 Participants |
| Most common sites of metastasis Liver No metastasis | 67 Participants |
| Most common sites of metastasis Lung Metastasis present | 28 Participants |
| Most common sites of metastasis Lung No metastasis | 371 Participants |
| Most common sites of metastasis Lymph nodes Metastasis present | 86 Participants |
| Most common sites of metastasis Lymph nodes No metastasis | 313 Participants |
| Most common sites of metastasis Peritoneum Metastasis present | 55 Participants |
| Most common sites of metastasis Peritoneum No metastasis | 344 Participants |
| Previous lines of treatment 1 | 217 Participants |
| Previous lines of treatment 2 | 92 Participants |
| Previous lines of treatment ≥ 2 | 90 Participants |
| Primary tumor location Colorectal | 18 Participants |
| Primary tumor location Gastric | 10 Participants |
| Primary tumor location Other / Unknown | 27 Participants |
| Primary tumor location Pancreas | 167 Participants |
| Primary tumor location Small intestine | 177 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 380 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or latino | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 399 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 171 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 228 Participants |
| Tumor Differentiation Carcinomas (NEC) | 28 Participants |
| Tumor Differentiation Tumors (NET) | 361 Participants |
| Tumor Differentiation Unknown | 10 Participants |
| Tumor grade; World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 1 | 147 Participants |
| Tumor grade; World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 2 | 197 Participants |
| Tumor grade; World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3 | 50 Participants |
| Tumor grade; World Health Organization (WHO) Unknown | 5 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Chemotherapy Not received this previous treatment | 319 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Chemotherapy Received this previous treatment | 80 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Clinical trial Not received this previous treatment | 357 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Clinical trial Received this previous treatment | 42 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Immunotherapy Not received this previous treatment | 392 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Immunotherapy Received this previous treatment | 7 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Others Not received this previous treatment | 393 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Others Received this previous treatment | 6 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) Not received this previous treatment | 290 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) Received this previous treatment | 109 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Somatostatin analogs (SSA) Not received this previous treatment | 57 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Somatostatin analogs (SSA) Received this previous treatment | 342 Participants |
| Type of previous lines TACE or locoregional therapy Not received this previous treatment | 388 Participants |
| Type of previous lines TACE or locoregional therapy Received this previous treatment | 11 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Targeted kinase inhibitors Not received this previous treatment | 291 Participants |
| Type of previous lines Targeted kinase inhibitors Received this previous treatment | 108 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Prevalence of Malnutrition in GEP NET
Percentage of GEP NET patients suffering from malnutrition in Spain according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), which was convened by several of the major global clinical nutrition societies. Malnutrition diagnosis is based on three phenotypic criteria (non-volitional weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake or assimilation, and inflammation or disease burden). Patients having one or more phenotypic and etiologic criteria are considered malnourished.
Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEP NET | Prevalence of Malnutrition in GEP NET | Malnutrition (GLIM criteria) | 247 Participants |
| GEP NET | Prevalence of Malnutrition in GEP NET | No malnutrition | 152 Participants |
Risk of Malnutrition in GEP NET
Percentage of GEP NET patients at risk of suffering from malnutrition in Spain according to Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). Three independent criteria are used by MUST to determine the overall risk for malnutrition: current weight status using BMI, unintentional weight loss, and acute disease effect.
Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEP NET | Risk of Malnutrition in GEP NET | Low risk | 264 Participants |
| GEP NET | Risk of Malnutrition in GEP NET | Intermediate risk | 67 Participants |
| GEP NET | Risk of Malnutrition in GEP NET | High risk | 56 Participants |
| GEP NET | Risk of Malnutrition in GEP NET | Missing | 12 Participants |
Body Fat
Body fat mass calculated by bioimpedance
Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)
Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to their sex and malnutrition status. The analyzed patient number in each subgroup might be inferior to the full sample size as some patients may have missing BMI , or unknown GLIM malnutrition status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEP NET | Body Fat | Male | 58.2 Kg |
| GEP NET | Body Fat | Female | 41.5 Kg |
| GEP NET | Body Fat | Malnutrition (GLIM) | 47.0 Kg |
| GEP NET | Body Fat | No Malnutrition (GLIM) | 57.3 Kg |
| GEP NET | Body Fat | Overall | 51.4 Kg |
Body Mass Index
Body mass index (BMI) is defined as a a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women
Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)
Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to their sex and malnutrition status.~The analyzed patient number in each subgroup might be inferior to the full sample size as some patients may have missing BMI , or unknown GLIM malnutrition status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Male | Underweight (BMI < 18.5) | 6 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Male | Normal (BMI 18.5 - 25) | 96 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Male | Overweight (BMI 25 - 30) | 95 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Male | Obese (BMI >= 30) | 31 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Female | Underweight (BMI < 18.5) | 17 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Female | Normal (BMI 18.5 - 25) | 89 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Female | Overweight (BMI 25 - 30) | 53 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Female | Obese (BMI >= 30) | 12 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Malnutrition (GLIM) | Underweight (BMI < 18.5) | 23 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Malnutrition (GLIM) | Normal (BMI 18.5 - 25) | 116 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Malnutrition (GLIM) | Overweight (BMI 25 - 30) | 80 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Malnutrition (GLIM) | Obese (BMI >= 30) | 28 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | No malnutrition (GLIM) | Underweight (BMI < 18.5) | 0 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | No malnutrition (GLIM) | Normal (BMI 18.5 - 25) | 68 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | No malnutrition (GLIM) | Obese (BMI >= 30) | 15 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Overall | Underweight (BMI < 18.5) | 23 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Overall | Normal (BMI 18.5 - 25) | 185 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Overall | Overweight (BMI 25 - 30) | 148 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | Overall | Obese (BMI >= 30) | 43 Participants |
| GEP NET | Body Mass Index | No malnutrition (GLIM) | Overweight (BMI 25 - 30) | 68 Participants |
Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) Rates
Scale to evaluate the malnutrition in adult patients. It is based in the assessment of BMI, weight loss in the last 3-6 months and acute disease effects. The score ranges from 0 (low malnutrition risk to 6 (high malnutrition risk).
Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)
Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to the malnutrition status. The analyzed patient number in each subgroup might be inferior to the full sample size as some patients may have missing BMI , or unknown GLIM malnutrition status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEP NET | Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) Rates | Malnutrition (GLIM) | 1.5 Score |
| GEP NET | Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) Rates | No malnutrition (GLIM) | 0 Score |
| GEP NET | Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) Rates | Overall | 1 Score |
Phase Angle
Body muscle mass calculated by bioimpedance and measured by Phase Angle. Here we report the phase angle, a marker of muscle mass and function, measured in degrees. Higher degrees of phase angle indicates greater cell integrity and function, reflecting healthier and more robust muscles.
Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)
Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to their sex and malnutrition status. The analyzed patient number in each subgroup might be inferior to the full sample size as some patients may have missing BMI , or unknown GLIM malnutrition status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEP NET | Phase Angle | Malnutrition (GLIM) | 5.0 degrees |
| GEP NET | Phase Angle | No malnutrition (GLIM) | 5.6 degrees |
| GEP NET | Phase Angle | Overall | 5.1 degrees |
| GEP NET | Phase Angle | Male | 5.5 degrees |
| GEP NET | Phase Angle | Female | 4.8 degrees |
Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates
Score to measure risk malnutrition in adult patients based on patient history and physical examination alone. The score has 3 levels: A (low malnutrition risk) to C (high malnutrition risk)
Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)
Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to the malnutrition status
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Malnutrition (GLIM) | Missing data | 0 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | No malnutrition (GLIM) | Good nutritional status | 140 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Overall | Missing data | 4 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | No malnutrition (GLIM) | Missing data | 0 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Overall | Good nutritional status | 285 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Malnutrition (GLIM) | Good nutritional status | 144 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Malnutrition (GLIM) | Moderate malnutrition or risk of malnutrition | 79 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Malnutrition (GLIM) | Severe malnutrition | 22 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | No malnutrition (GLIM) | Moderate malnutrition or risk of malnutrition | 8 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | No malnutrition (GLIM) | Severe malnutrition | 1 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Overall | Moderate malnutrition or risk of malnutrition | 87 Participants |
| GEP NET | Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates | Overall | Severe malnutrition | 23 Participants |