Skip to content

Nutrition in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

Nutritional Status of Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Spain: NUTRIGETNE

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04986085
Acronym
NUTRIGETNE
Enrollment
399
Registered
2021-08-02
Start date
2021-02-24
Completion date
2024-02-23
Last updated
2025-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

Keywords

GEP NET, Neuroendocrine tumor, Nutritional status

Brief summary

It is well known that the prevalence of malnutrition or risk of malnutrition in cancer patients is high, as well as its impact on different parameters such as hospitalization, survival or response to certain treatments. In patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET), due to their heterogeneity and longer survival, it is expected that the prevalence of malnutrition is probably underdiagnosed, as well as the existence of a negative impact on different parameters (quality of life, survival). So far, the studies carried out on nutrition and NET are very scarce and none has been carried out so far in Spain. Before being able to carry out nutritional intervention studies on these patients, it is necessary to know the reality of the nutritional status of patients with NETs in Spain. The main motivation for the NUTRIGETNE study is to evaluate the epidemiological status of nutrition in NETs in the spanish population. In addition to know the epidemiological picture, it is intended to study the nutritional status from different points of view: analytical, clinical, anthropometric, etc. Besides, the study of nutritional status will allow us to closely monitor the patients who have a higher risk of malnutrition and to propose early interventions for those, as well as the impact of their nutritional status on different parameters: survival, hospitalization, quality of life or responses to the treatments. NUTRIGETNE is a cross-sectional, open and multicenter study in which the nutritional status of patients with GEP NET in Spain will be evaluated.

Detailed description

NUTRIGETNE is a cross-sectional, open and multicenter study in which the nutritional status of patients with GEP NET in Spain will be evaluated. It is planned to include 400 GEP NET patients. Patients will be included consecutively when visiting the corresponding health centers for outpatient visits or hospitalization. The study comprises 3 stages with a total duration of 10 to 40 days for the participation of each subject in the study: Screening visit, First day (day 0): The initial screening will take place on the first day the patient visits the hospital. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be reviewed to assess the eligibility of the patient. The implications of the study will be explained to the patient and the informed consent will be signed. Visit for assessment of nutritional status (days 0-10): taking a medical history, complete physical examination including anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance (BIA) and dynamometry, as well as laboratory analysis. The evaluation of the nutritional status will be carried out by a registered nutritionist, specialized nurse or specialist doctor (variable depending on the characteristics of the center). Data collection (day 10-40): collection of analytical, anthropometric, BIA, dynamometry and clinical results and introduction into the electronic case report form (eCRF). After the end of recruitment and database lock, all data will be subsequently analyzed and presented when applicable through study reports and scientific communications.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Grupo Espanol de Tumores Neuroendocrinos
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with a gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor by histopathological study. * Legally capable patients ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years of age. * Patients who have signed the informed consent for this study as specified in section 10.3. * Patients in active treatment: active treatment is considered to be those patients in an advanced stage and in any type of medical treatment (somatostatin analogues, molecular therapies, chemotherapy, radionuclides...), or locoregional therapies. Note: Decision was taken to treat the patient with an specific treatment prior and independently of patient inclusion in this non interventional study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients \<18 or \> 80 years of age. * Female patients that are currently pregnant. * Patients with a gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor lacking an histopathological diagnosis. * Patients in palliative treatment or terminal stage. * Patients who have not signed the informed consent or any situation or condition that compromises the giving of patient voluntary informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of Malnutrition in GEP NETThroughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)Percentage of GEP NET patients suffering from malnutrition in Spain according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), which was convened by several of the major global clinical nutrition societies. Malnutrition diagnosis is based on three phenotypic criteria (non-volitional weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake or assimilation, and inflammation or disease burden). Patients having one or more phenotypic and etiologic criteria are considered malnourished.
Risk of Malnutrition in GEP NETThroughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)Percentage of GEP NET patients at risk of suffering from malnutrition in Spain according to Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). Three independent criteria are used by MUST to determine the overall risk for malnutrition: current weight status using BMI, unintentional weight loss, and acute disease effect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase AngleThroughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)Body muscle mass calculated by bioimpedance and measured by Phase Angle. Here we report the phase angle, a marker of muscle mass and function, measured in degrees. Higher degrees of phase angle indicates greater cell integrity and function, reflecting healthier and more robust muscles.
Body Mass IndexThroughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)Body mass index (BMI) is defined as a a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women
Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesThroughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)Score to measure risk malnutrition in adult patients based on patient history and physical examination alone. The score has 3 levels: A (low malnutrition risk) to C (high malnutrition risk)
Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) RatesThroughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)Scale to evaluate the malnutrition in adult patients. It is based in the assessment of BMI, weight loss in the last 3-6 months and acute disease effects. The score ranges from 0 (low malnutrition risk to 6 (high malnutrition risk).
Body FatThroughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)Body fat mass calculated by bioimpedance

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GEP NET
GEP NET patients in Spain
399
Total399

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGEP NET
Age, Continuous62 years
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)
Score 0
213 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)
Score 1
125 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)
Score ≥ 2
20 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)
Score Unknown
41 Participants
Functionality
Functioning
98 Participants
Functionality
Not functioning
295 Participants
Functionality
Unknown
6 Participants
Metastasis at inclusion
0
15 Participants
Metastasis at inclusion
1
227 Participants
Metastasis at inclusion
≥ 2
157 Participants
Most common sites of metastasis
Liver
Metastasis present
332 Participants
Most common sites of metastasis
Liver
No metastasis
67 Participants
Most common sites of metastasis
Lung
Metastasis present
28 Participants
Most common sites of metastasis
Lung
No metastasis
371 Participants
Most common sites of metastasis
Lymph nodes
Metastasis present
86 Participants
Most common sites of metastasis
Lymph nodes
No metastasis
313 Participants
Most common sites of metastasis
Peritoneum
Metastasis present
55 Participants
Most common sites of metastasis
Peritoneum
No metastasis
344 Participants
Previous lines of treatment
1
217 Participants
Previous lines of treatment
2
92 Participants
Previous lines of treatment
≥ 2
90 Participants
Primary tumor location
Colorectal
18 Participants
Primary tumor location
Gastric
10 Participants
Primary tumor location
Other / Unknown
27 Participants
Primary tumor location
Pancreas
167 Participants
Primary tumor location
Small intestine
177 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
380 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or latino
13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
399 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
171 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
228 Participants
Tumor Differentiation
Carcinomas (NEC)
28 Participants
Tumor Differentiation
Tumors (NET)
361 Participants
Tumor Differentiation
Unknown
10 Participants
Tumor grade; World Health Organization (WHO)
Grade 1
147 Participants
Tumor grade; World Health Organization (WHO)
Grade 2
197 Participants
Tumor grade; World Health Organization (WHO)
Grade 3
50 Participants
Tumor grade; World Health Organization (WHO)
Unknown
5 Participants
Type of previous lines
Chemotherapy
Not received this previous treatment
319 Participants
Type of previous lines
Chemotherapy
Received this previous treatment
80 Participants
Type of previous lines
Clinical trial
Not received this previous treatment
357 Participants
Type of previous lines
Clinical trial
Received this previous treatment
42 Participants
Type of previous lines
Immunotherapy
Not received this previous treatment
392 Participants
Type of previous lines
Immunotherapy
Received this previous treatment
7 Participants
Type of previous lines
Others
Not received this previous treatment
393 Participants
Type of previous lines
Others
Received this previous treatment
6 Participants
Type of previous lines
Peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT)
Not received this previous treatment
290 Participants
Type of previous lines
Peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT)
Received this previous treatment
109 Participants
Type of previous lines
Somatostatin analogs (SSA)
Not received this previous treatment
57 Participants
Type of previous lines
Somatostatin analogs (SSA)
Received this previous treatment
342 Participants
Type of previous lines
TACE or locoregional therapy
Not received this previous treatment
388 Participants
Type of previous lines
TACE or locoregional therapy
Received this previous treatment
11 Participants
Type of previous lines
Targeted kinase inhibitors
Not received this previous treatment
291 Participants
Type of previous lines
Targeted kinase inhibitors
Received this previous treatment
108 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Prevalence of Malnutrition in GEP NET

Percentage of GEP NET patients suffering from malnutrition in Spain according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), which was convened by several of the major global clinical nutrition societies. Malnutrition diagnosis is based on three phenotypic criteria (non-volitional weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake or assimilation, and inflammation or disease burden). Patients having one or more phenotypic and etiologic criteria are considered malnourished.

Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GEP NETPrevalence of Malnutrition in GEP NETMalnutrition (GLIM criteria)247 Participants
GEP NETPrevalence of Malnutrition in GEP NETNo malnutrition152 Participants
Primary

Risk of Malnutrition in GEP NET

Percentage of GEP NET patients at risk of suffering from malnutrition in Spain according to Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). Three independent criteria are used by MUST to determine the overall risk for malnutrition: current weight status using BMI, unintentional weight loss, and acute disease effect.

Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GEP NETRisk of Malnutrition in GEP NETLow risk264 Participants
GEP NETRisk of Malnutrition in GEP NETIntermediate risk67 Participants
GEP NETRisk of Malnutrition in GEP NETHigh risk56 Participants
GEP NETRisk of Malnutrition in GEP NETMissing12 Participants
Secondary

Body Fat

Body fat mass calculated by bioimpedance

Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)

Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to their sex and malnutrition status. The analyzed patient number in each subgroup might be inferior to the full sample size as some patients may have missing BMI , or unknown GLIM malnutrition status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
GEP NETBody FatMale58.2 Kg
GEP NETBody FatFemale41.5 Kg
GEP NETBody FatMalnutrition (GLIM)47.0 Kg
GEP NETBody FatNo Malnutrition (GLIM)57.3 Kg
GEP NETBody FatOverall51.4 Kg
Secondary

Body Mass Index

Body mass index (BMI) is defined as a a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women

Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)

Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to their sex and malnutrition status.~The analyzed patient number in each subgroup might be inferior to the full sample size as some patients may have missing BMI , or unknown GLIM malnutrition status.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GEP NETBody Mass IndexMaleUnderweight (BMI < 18.5)6 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexMaleNormal (BMI 18.5 - 25)96 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexMaleOverweight (BMI 25 - 30)95 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexMaleObese (BMI >= 30)31 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexFemaleUnderweight (BMI < 18.5)17 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexFemaleNormal (BMI 18.5 - 25)89 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexFemaleOverweight (BMI 25 - 30)53 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexFemaleObese (BMI >= 30)12 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexMalnutrition (GLIM)Underweight (BMI < 18.5)23 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexMalnutrition (GLIM)Normal (BMI 18.5 - 25)116 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexMalnutrition (GLIM)Overweight (BMI 25 - 30)80 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexMalnutrition (GLIM)Obese (BMI >= 30)28 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexNo malnutrition (GLIM)Underweight (BMI < 18.5)0 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexNo malnutrition (GLIM)Normal (BMI 18.5 - 25)68 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexNo malnutrition (GLIM)Obese (BMI >= 30)15 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexOverallUnderweight (BMI < 18.5)23 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexOverallNormal (BMI 18.5 - 25)185 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexOverallOverweight (BMI 25 - 30)148 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexOverallObese (BMI >= 30)43 Participants
GEP NETBody Mass IndexNo malnutrition (GLIM)Overweight (BMI 25 - 30)68 Participants
Secondary

Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) Rates

Scale to evaluate the malnutrition in adult patients. It is based in the assessment of BMI, weight loss in the last 3-6 months and acute disease effects. The score ranges from 0 (low malnutrition risk to 6 (high malnutrition risk).

Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)

Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to the malnutrition status. The analyzed patient number in each subgroup might be inferior to the full sample size as some patients may have missing BMI , or unknown GLIM malnutrition status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
GEP NETNutritional Risk Screening (NRS) RatesMalnutrition (GLIM)1.5 Score
GEP NETNutritional Risk Screening (NRS) RatesNo malnutrition (GLIM)0 Score
GEP NETNutritional Risk Screening (NRS) RatesOverall1 Score
Secondary

Phase Angle

Body muscle mass calculated by bioimpedance and measured by Phase Angle. Here we report the phase angle, a marker of muscle mass and function, measured in degrees. Higher degrees of phase angle indicates greater cell integrity and function, reflecting healthier and more robust muscles.

Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)

Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to their sex and malnutrition status. The analyzed patient number in each subgroup might be inferior to the full sample size as some patients may have missing BMI , or unknown GLIM malnutrition status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
GEP NETPhase AngleMalnutrition (GLIM)5.0 degrees
GEP NETPhase AngleNo malnutrition (GLIM)5.6 degrees
GEP NETPhase AngleOverall5.1 degrees
GEP NETPhase AngleMale5.5 degrees
GEP NETPhase AngleFemale4.8 degrees
Secondary

Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Rates

Score to measure risk malnutrition in adult patients based on patient history and physical examination alone. The score has 3 levels: A (low malnutrition risk) to C (high malnutrition risk)

Time frame: Throughout the study period. Nutritional status will be reported at a single timepoint for each patient (between 1-10 days after informed consent signature)

Population: The endpoint is reported in overall population and in subgroups. according to the malnutrition status

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesMalnutrition (GLIM)Missing data0 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesNo malnutrition (GLIM)Good nutritional status140 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesOverallMissing data4 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesNo malnutrition (GLIM)Missing data0 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesOverallGood nutritional status285 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesMalnutrition (GLIM)Good nutritional status144 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesMalnutrition (GLIM)Moderate malnutrition or risk of malnutrition79 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesMalnutrition (GLIM)Severe malnutrition22 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesNo malnutrition (GLIM)Moderate malnutrition or risk of malnutrition8 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesNo malnutrition (GLIM)Severe malnutrition1 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesOverallModerate malnutrition or risk of malnutrition87 Participants
GEP NETSubjective Global Assessment (SGA) RatesOverallSevere malnutrition23 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026