Skip to content

The Effects of Active Warming on Temperature on Core Body and Thermal Comfort

The Effects of Active Warming on Temperature on Core Body and Thermal Comfort in Patients After Transurethral Resection of The Prostate

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04985617
Enrollment
105
Registered
2021-08-02
Start date
2019-02-08
Completion date
2019-12-20
Last updated
2021-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Hypothermia, Thermal Comfort, Body Temperature Changes

Keywords

fluid infusion, postoperative hypothermia, nursing, active warming

Brief summary

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the effect of warmed intravenous fluids (WIVF) on the core body temperature and the patients' thermal comforts during the postoperative period in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Design: This was a prospective, randomized controlled experimental study. Methods: A total of 105 male patients undergoing TURP surgery and bladder irrigation were randomized to one of either room temperature (n=51) or warmed intravenous fluids (n=54) groups in postanesthesia care unit. The fluids in the experimental group were warmed until the body temperature was reached 36.0°C.

Detailed description

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the effect of warmed intravenous fluids (WIVF) on the core body temperature and the patients' thermal comforts during the postoperative period in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Design: This was a prospective, randomized controlled experimental study. Methods: A total of 105 male patients undergoing TURP surgery and bladder irrigation were randomized to one of either room temperature (n=51) or warmed intravenous fluids (n=54) groups in postanesthesia care unit. The fluids in the experimental group were warmed until the body temperature was reached 36.0°C. The intravenous (IV) fluid given to the two groups was 1000 ml of 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride solution.

Interventions

The IV fluid given to the patients in the intervention group was heated to 36ºC using the medical heating device.

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The intervention and measurements were carried out by the first researcher, and the patients discovered their own groups when the postoperative warming intervention was applied to them. Because of the nature of the intervention, blinding could not be performed

Intervention model description

This was a prospective, randomized controlled experimental study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
37 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients who age bigger than18, * patients who were undergoing general anesthesia, to whom voluntary hypothermia was not applied during the operation, * patients who were hemodynamically stable, * patients who had a physician's order for 1000 ml of 0.9% Isotonic Sodium Chloride IV fluid treatment, * patients were undergoing bladder irrigation were included in the study. * patients the sense, expression of heat by the patient in recovery, * patient who accepted to participate to the study

Exclusion criteria

* patients have any infection, fever * patients have underlying diseases (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, diabetes, cardiovascular disease or kidney failure) * patients who had mental deficiency that could prevent communication, * patients who had visual or hearing impairments, * patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation support, were sedated, * patients were the need for open surgery or any reason for returning the patient to the operating room, * patients need for postoperative blood transfusions, * patients have intra-abdominal infection, * patients have an unexpected allergy to anesthetic drugs, * patients have a temperature higher than 36.0ºC, * patients have for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, * patients have severe hemodynamic changes during the operation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thermal Comfort Scale (TCS)6 monthsThermal Comfort Scale (TCS): This is a Likert type scale which was developed by Wagner et. al. (2006) and the validity and reliability in Turkish was tested by Özsaban (2017). The evaluation of thermal comfort was made by the face to face interview method for all patients. The TCS evaluates the patient's temperature comfort perception subjectively. The scale consists of 13 items in total, and each item is scored between 1 and 6 points. A high score indicates a high temperature comfort level.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026