Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of QGE031 (Ligelizumab) in Patients With Peanut Allergy

A 52 Week, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab (QGE031) in Decreasing the Sensitivity to Peanuts in Patients With Peanut Allergy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04984876
Enrollment
211
Registered
2021-08-02
Start date
2021-12-07
Completion date
2023-11-27
Last updated
2025-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergy, Peanut

Keywords

Food allergy, Peanut allergy, Oral food challenge, IgE, ligelizumab

Brief summary

This was a 52-week, Phase 3 multi-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of two dosing regimens of ligelizumab (240 mg and 120 mg) SC q4w (subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks) in participants with a medically confirmed diagnosis of Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated peanut allergy.

Detailed description

Participants were randomized to ligelizumab 240 mg, ligelizumab 120 mg, or placebo (5 treatment arms, randomization ratio of 2:2:2:2:1) for the double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period (up to Week 12). Participants initially assigned to the 8-week placebo arms received the first dose of blinded ligelizumab treatment at the Week 8 visit. Participants initially assigned to the 16-week placebo arm received the last dose of placebo before the Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) at Week 12 and the first dose of blinded ligelizumab treatment at the Week 16 visit. At the start of the study, recruitment was restricted to 12-55-year-old participants. After approximately 60 adolescent participants (defined as 12-17 yrs of age) had completed all Week 12 assessments, an interim analysis (IA1) on Pharmacokinetics (PK) and selected Pharmacodynamics (PD) data (total IgE and basophil bound High affinity immunoglobulin E receptor 1 (FcƐRI)) was performed (safety was reviewed by a Data Monitoring Committee - DMC). Independent sponsor members who were responsible for PK/ PD data analysis and Modeling & Simulation were unblinded to the results of this interim analysis. The planned intent of this analysis was to confirm the dosing strategy for the youngest age group, 6-11 yrs and once the dose was to be confirmed, recruitment was supposed to be open for this age group. However, Novartis made a strategic decision to close recruitment in the study CQGE031G12301 and to terminate the study early, once all eligible participants in the study had completed week 12 assessments and the 16-week safety follow-up period. This decision was based on a blinded data review, which showed evidence of efficacy without the detection of any safety signal and that efficacy may be optimized with a different dosing regimen. Due to this decision, the final population size was 211, with only adolescent and adult participants (12 - 17yrs, and 18 - 55yrs) recruited.

Interventions

Subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Signed informed consent and/or assent (where applicable) was obtained prior to study participation. Participant (and parent/legal guardian) was able to understand and provide informed consent and assent, as applicable. If a minor participant providing assent reaches the age of legal majority (as defined by local law), he/she was re-consented (ICF) at the next study visit. 2. Male or female participants who were 6 to 55 yrs of age at the time of signing informed consent/assent. 3. Documented medical history of allergy to peanuts or peanut-containing foods. 4. Positive peanut-specific IgE (peanut sIgE), ≥ 0.35 kUA/L at Screening Visit 1. 5. Positive SPT for peanut allergen at Screening Visit 1. This is defined as the average diameter (longest diameter and mid-point orthogonal diameter) ≥ 4 mm wheal compared to the negative control. 6. A positive peanut DBPCFC at baseline (Screening Visit 2, Part 1 and Part 2 DBPCFC) defined as the occurrence of dose-limiting symptoms at a single dose ≤ 100 mg of peanut protein. Eligibility to proceed with the DBPCFC requires presence of all inclusion and absence of all

Exclusion criteria

. 7. Participants must weigh ≥ 20 kg at Screening Visit 1. 8. Participants must be able to receive injections (study treatment), participate in the DBPCFC, and must be willing to continue avoiding exposure to peanuts and any other foods that they are allergic to throughout this study. Key

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12Week 12Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of \>= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12Week 12Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Baseline, Week 12, Week 52Change from baseline of serum levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)
Percentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Week 12Symptom severity occurring at any challenge dose of peanut protein up to and including 1000 mg during the DBPCFC conducted at Week 12 was categorized as 4 levels: None, Mild, Moderate, Severe. The CoFAR grading system was used to categorize the symptom severity as mild, moderate and severe. Symptom severity for participants who completed DBPCFC without any symptom were categorized as none.
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 After 4 Weeks of TreatmentWeek 12Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of \>= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12 after 4 weeks of treatment (8 weeks of placebo + 4 weeks of ligelizumab treatment versus 12 weeks of placebo). The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52Week 52Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating the specified peanut protein doses (\>= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose), \>= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) or 3000 mg (5044 mg cumulative tolerated dose)) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 52. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Baseline, Week 12, Week 52Change from baseline in maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator.
Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12Week 12Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of \>= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.
Change From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56Baseline, Week 16/Week 56The Skin Prick Test (SPT) is a widely used diagnostic tool for identifying allergen-specific IgE-mediated allergies. During the test, a small amount of allergen, in this case, peanut allergen, is introduced into the skin. The allergen interacts with specific IgE antibodies bound to cutaneous mast cells. This interaction can cause a reaction, resulting in a wheal and flare on the skin. The size of the wheal and flare, specifically the longest diameter and the midpoint orthogonal diameter, were evaluated at each site and the average size of the wheal and flare across all sites was summarized and reported. Considering the study termination, SPT originally scheduled at Week 56 was performed 4 weeks after Week 12 assessment in some patients.
Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes three domains (Emotional Impact (EI), Allergen Avoidance and Dietary Restrictions (AADR) and Risk of Accidental Exposure (RAE)). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score and the domain scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If more than one item in any domain is missing, a domain score should not be calculated for that case. However, a total score could still be calculated if 20% or fewer of the items are missing. Therefore, the range for each item, domain, and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL.
Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes four domains (Emotional Impact (EI), Allergen Avoidance and Dietary Restrictions (AADR), Risk of Accidental Exposure (RAE) and Food Allergy Related Health (FAH)). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score and the domain scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If more than one item in any domain is missing, a domain score should not be calculated for that case. However, a total score could still be calculated if 20% or fewer of the items are missing. Therefore, the range for each item, domain, and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk. The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. Each question is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a greater score indicating a higher level of perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. The total score is calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If less than 80% of the items within the score are complete, the total score is not calculated. Therefore, the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk. The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. Each question is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a greater score indicating a higher level of perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. The total score is calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If less than 80% of the items within the score are complete, the total score is calculated. Therefore, the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring.
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Baseline, Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))The SF-36v2 Health Survey is a 36-item instrument that measures generic health-related quality of life. It is designed for use in surveys of general and specific populations, health policy evaluations and clinical practice and research. It contains 8 scales and 2 component summary indices evaluating physical, social and emotional functioning in addition to general health perceptions and mental health. Responses to items allow for direct calculation of scale scores, while the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores are computed from weighted scale scores. For all scales and summary measures, higher scores indicate better health outcomes (PCS and MCS scores range 0 to 100).
Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Baseline, Week 12, Week 52Change from baseline of serum levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE)

Countries

Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted in 56 centers in 10 countries worldwide

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ligelizumab 240 mg
ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks
47
Ligelizumab 120 mg
ligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks
51
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 240 mg
Placebo subcutaneous injection for first 8 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 44 weeks
46
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mg
Placebo subcutaneous injection for first 8 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 44 weeks
44
Placebo 16 Weeks and Ligelizumab 240 mg
Placebo subcutaneous injection for first 16 weeks and ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneous injection for 36 weeks
11
Placebo 16 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mg
Placebo subcutaneous injection for first 16 weeks and ligelizumab 120 mg subcutaneous injection for 36 weeks
12
Total211

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event001000
Overall StudyGuardian decision010201
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision100100
Overall StudySubject decision2103330

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLigelizumab 240 mgLigelizumab 120 mgPlacebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 240 mgPlacebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgPlacebo 16 Weeks and Ligelizumab 240 mgPlacebo 16 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgTotal
Age, Continuous19.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
18.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.27
18.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.95
20.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.75
17.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.57
16.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.58
18.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.85
Age, Customized
12 - 17 years
27 Participants29 Participants25 Participants24 Participants6 Participants8 Participants119 Participants
Age, Customized
18 - 55 years
20 Participants22 Participants21 Participants20 Participants5 Participants4 Participants92 Participants
History of anaphylactic reaction to food
No
14 Participants15 Participants16 Participants12 Participants2 Participants4 Participants63 Participants
History of anaphylactic reaction to food
Unknown
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
History of anaphylactic reaction to food
Yes
32 Participants36 Participants29 Participants32 Participants9 Participants8 Participants146 Participants
MTD (maximum tolerated dose) of peanut protein (mg) - n (%)
10 mg
9 Participants14 Participants7 Participants11 Participants4 Participants5 Participants50 Participants
MTD (maximum tolerated dose) of peanut protein (mg) - n (%)
< 1 mg
2 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants12 Participants
MTD (maximum tolerated dose) of peanut protein (mg) - n (%)
1 mg
4 Participants4 Participants6 Participants9 Participants1 Participants2 Participants26 Participants
MTD (maximum tolerated dose) of peanut protein (mg) - n (%)
30 mg
18 Participants14 Participants20 Participants11 Participants4 Participants4 Participants71 Participants
MTD (maximum tolerated dose) of peanut protein (mg) - n (%)
3 mg
14 Participants14 Participants11 Participants11 Participants1 Participants1 Participants52 Participants
Number of participants with at least one food allergy
1 food allergy
12 Participants15 Participants13 Participants11 Participants5 Participants3 Participants59 Participants
Number of participants with at least one food allergy
2 food allergies
10 Participants5 Participants8 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants29 Participants
Number of participants with at least one food allergy
3 food allergies
5 Participants5 Participants2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants21 Participants
Number of participants with at least one food allergy
4 food allergies
8 Participants7 Participants6 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants26 Participants
Number of participants with at least one food allergy
> 5 food allergies
12 Participants15 Participants13 Participants17 Participants1 Participants4 Participants62 Participants
Number of participants with at least one food allergy
5 food allergies
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants14 Participants
Peanut Skin Prick Test (SPT) (average across dilutions): Size of mean wheal diameter7.232 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8339
7.273 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7253
7.508 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7624
7.907 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8866
6.575 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3809
7.743 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3547
7.442 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7463
Peanut Skin Prick Test (SPT) (undiluted): Size of mean wheal diameter13.83 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.72
14.61 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.007
13.23 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.414
16.82 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.262
14.45 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.845
12.17 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.664
14.45 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.508
Peanut specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE)109.021 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 147.9877
80.644 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 117.6312
131.948 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 189.7757
116.198 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 128.9151
51.606 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.6951
262.136 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 543.7764
114.372 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 191.3605
Poly-allergic to food
No
12 Participants15 Participants13 Participants11 Participants5 Participants3 Participants59 Participants
Poly-allergic to food
Yes
35 Participants36 Participants33 Participants33 Participants6 Participants9 Participants152 Participants
Poly-sensitized to food
No
18 Participants24 Participants24 Participants17 Participants3 Participants4 Participants90 Participants
Poly-sensitized to food
Yes
29 Participants27 Participants22 Participants27 Participants8 Participants8 Participants121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants10 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants36 Participants42 Participants39 Participants7 Participants10 Participants165 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants25 Participants19 Participants20 Participants3 Participants6 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants26 Participants27 Participants24 Participants8 Participants6 Participants113 Participants
Time to diagnosis of peanut allergy16.287 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9393
16.381 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9248
15.556 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5799
17.748 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8969
15.598 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3525
14.971 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5291
16.344 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2808
Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)524.35 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 444.009
482.25 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 478.047
455.38 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 397.96
436.31 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 335.113
325.15 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 208.482
635.42 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 535.099
476.81 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 418.656

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 470 / 510 / 1130 / 470 / 510 / 230 / 990 / 101
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 4717 / 5127 / 11326 / 4720 / 519 / 2357 / 9953 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 470 / 510 / 1130 / 470 / 510 / 230 / 991 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12

Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of \>= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). This outcome measure applies to ligelizumab 120 mg arm, ligelizumab 240 mg arm, and placebo 16-week to ligelizumab 120/240 mg arm (labelled as placebo for efficacy estimands).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 1221 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 128 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 600 mg (1044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 121 Participants
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [4.34, 506.78]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.07395% CI: [0.8, 100.98]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52

Change from baseline in maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only participants with a value at both Baseline and the corresponding post-baseline visit (Week 12 or Week 52) included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12274.05 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 501.051
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52800.41 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 178.687
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52164.23 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 459916.375
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12104.31 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 794.248
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 5289.55 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 408.957
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12148.98 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 754.171
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52146.48 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 113.009
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 1244.29 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 768.803
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms During the DBPCFC at Week 12 and Week 52Week 1246.62 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 555.207
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52

Change from baseline of serum levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE)

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only participants with a value at both Baseline and the corresponding post-baseline visit (Week 12 or Week 52) included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12258.28 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 282.477
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52362.36 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 436.857
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12295.60 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 321.451
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52297.94 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 285.827
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12302.22 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 323.846
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52338.63 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 435.532
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52361.44 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 587.852
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12400.03 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 611.676
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12-35.52 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 179.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52174.75 kilounits per liter (kU/L)Standard Deviation 433.889
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52

Change from baseline of serum levels of peanut-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only participants with a value at both Baseline and the corresponding post-baseline visit (Week 12 or Week 52) included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52-0.01 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.608
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 12-0.09 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.65
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 520.73 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.103
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 120.35 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.178
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 120.12 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.903
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 520.21 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.909
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 120.11 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.789
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 520.01 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.768
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 120.03 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.469
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) at Week 12 and Week 52Week 52-0.09 mg/LStandard Deviation 1.126
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56

The Skin Prick Test (SPT) is a widely used diagnostic tool for identifying allergen-specific IgE-mediated allergies. During the test, a small amount of allergen, in this case, peanut allergen, is introduced into the skin. The allergen interacts with specific IgE antibodies bound to cutaneous mast cells. This interaction can cause a reaction, resulting in a wheal and flare on the skin. The size of the wheal and flare, specifically the longest diameter and the midpoint orthogonal diameter, were evaluated at each site and the average size of the wheal and flare across all sites was summarized and reported. Considering the study termination, SPT originally scheduled at Week 56 was performed 4 weeks after Week 12 assessment in some patients.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16/Week 56

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only participants with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56-10.85 undiluted peanut protein (mm)Standard Deviation 6.423
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56-8.40 undiluted peanut protein (mm)Standard Deviation 5.805
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56-5.28 undiluted peanut protein (mm)Standard Deviation 5.237
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56-7.25 undiluted peanut protein (mm)Standard Deviation 7.354
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Skin Prick Test (SPT) Mean Wheal Diameters at Week 16/Week 56-2.38 undiluted peanut protein (mm)Standard Deviation 3.788
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-5.15, -2.4]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-7.77, -2.09]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.01595% CI: [-6.08, -0.32]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1395% CI: [-4.62, 1.25]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)

The SF-36v2 Health Survey is a 36-item instrument that measures generic health-related quality of life. It is designed for use in surveys of general and specific populations, health policy evaluations and clinical practice and research. It contains 8 scales and 2 component summary indices evaluating physical, social and emotional functioning in addition to general health perceptions and mental health. Responses to items allow for direct calculation of scale scores, while the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores are computed from weighted scale scores. For all scales and summary measures, higher scores indicate better health outcomes (PCS and MCS scores range 0 to 100).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only participants with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Physical Component Score0.51 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.022
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Mental Component Score-0.15 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.95
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Physical Component Score0.38 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.912
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Mental Component Score-0.12 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.175
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Physical Component Score2.13 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.909
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Mental Component Score-1.78 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.458
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Mental Component Score-3.26 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.256
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Physical Component Score-2.19 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Physical Component Score3.15 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.342
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Mental Component Score-9.43 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.662
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)

The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes four domains (Emotional Impact (EI), Allergen Avoidance and Dietary Restrictions (AADR), Risk of Accidental Exposure (RAE) and Food Allergy Related Health (FAH)). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score and the domain scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If more than one item in any domain is missing, a domain score should not be calculated for that case. However, a total score could still be calculated if 20% or fewer of the items are missing. Therefore, the range for each item, domain, and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only adult participants with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE0.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.647
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR-0.10 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.788
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - FAH-0.47 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.864
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.16 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.742
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI0.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.747
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - FAH-0.17 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.082
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE-0.15 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.11 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.01 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR-0.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.609
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.47 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.006
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR-0.41 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.526
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - FAH-0.73 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.854
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR-0.74 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.585
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI-0.31 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.838
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE-0.40 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.427
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE-0.31 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.917
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.55 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.671
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.40 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.439
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - FAH-0.53 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.717
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI-0.35 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.601
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.20 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.601
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.60 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.783
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.90 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.027
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR-0.31 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.805
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR-0.70 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.106
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE0.02 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.834
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE-0.34 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.468
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - FAH-0.05 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.788
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - FAH-0.22 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score0.00 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.656
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.22 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.727
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - FAH-0.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.153
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - FAH0.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.056
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI-0.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.857
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE0.18 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.794
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR-0.12 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.731
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE-0.26 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.821
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR-0.20 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.749
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.26 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.828
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR-0.15 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.532
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE0.10 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.471
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI-0.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.358
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - FAH0.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE-0.33 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.549
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.14 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.542
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - FAH0.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.073
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR-0.05 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.508
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score0.00 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI0.00 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.553
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.59795% CI: [-0.44, 0.57]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.06495% CI: [-0.89, 0.11]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.19195% CI: [-0.72, 0.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.47295% CI: [-0.51, 0.48]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.53795% CI: [-0.57, 0.62]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.14195% CI: [-0.91, 0.27]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.06395% CI: [-1.04, 0.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.36895% CI: [-0.68, 0.48]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)

The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes three domains (Emotional Impact (EI), Allergen Avoidance and Dietary Restrictions (AADR) and Risk of Accidental Exposure (RAE)). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score and the domain scores are calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If more than one item in any domain is missing, a domain score should not be calculated for that case. However, a total score could still be calculated if 20% or fewer of the items are missing. Therefore, the range for each item, domain, and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only adolescent participants with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR-0.15 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.873
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.51 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.057
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE-0.28 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.718
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI-0.03 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.896
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE-0.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.085
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.09 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.833
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR-0.61 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.946
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.49 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.839
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE0.08 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.868
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE-0.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.028
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.13 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.869
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.01 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.779
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI-0.12 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.846
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.19 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.875
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR0.02 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.977
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR-0.14 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.004
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.23 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.737
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.08 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.879
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE-0.10 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.796
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR-0.08 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.291
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE0.08 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.733
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI-0.40 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.745
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR-0.35 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.988
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.30 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.647
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR-0.11 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.05 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.348
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.972
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE0.02 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.016
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score0.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.255
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE0.03 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.366
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR0.12 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.235
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI-0.11 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.062
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - RAE-0.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.253
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score0.27 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.835
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score0.09 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.954
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - EI0.27 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.034
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - EI-0.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.486
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - AADR0.25 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.628
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - RAE0.54 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.204
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total and Domain Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - AADR0.11 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.599
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.17395% CI: [-1.03, 0.36]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.20295% CI: [-0.96, 0.39]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.15195% CI: [-1.09, 0.34]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.26495% CI: [-0.94, 0.49]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.12395% CI: [-1.16, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.25895% CI: [-0.94, 0.47]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.32495% CI: [-0.92, 0.58]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.47395% CI: [-0.78, 0.73]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)

The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk. The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. Each question is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a greater score indicating a higher level of perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. The total score is calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If less than 80% of the items within the score are complete, the total score is calculated. Therefore, the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only adult participants with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score0.17 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.574
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.23 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.681
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.23 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.496
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.36 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.562
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.09 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.694
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.27 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.492
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.24 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.479
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score0.00 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.489
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score0.17 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.309
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score0.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.703
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.07195% CI: [-0.98, 0.14]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.57495% CI: [-0.42, 0.51]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.05695% CI: [-0.83, 0.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.06995% CI: [-0.83, 0.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.20595% CI: [-0.65, 0.27]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.24895% CI: [-0.76, 0.37]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.04895% CI: [-1.06, 0.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.14295% CI: [-0.85, 0.25]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)

The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF) is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk. The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. Each question is scored on a 7-point scale (coded as 1-7 in analysis), with a greater score indicating a higher level of perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. The total score is calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. If less than 80% of the items within the score are complete, the total score is not calculated. Therefore, the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 Part 1 (10 Days Before Day 1 Oral Food Challenge (OFC)), Week 12 Part 2 (3 Days After Day 2 Oral Food Challenge (OFC))

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only adolescent participants with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.03 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.751
Ligelizumab 240 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.31 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.952
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.11 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score0.31 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.784
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score-0.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.529
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score-0.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.524
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score0.39 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.133
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score0.31 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.989
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 1 - Total Score0.19 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) - Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Week 12 Part 2 - Total Score0.25 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.306
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.22595% CI: [-0.87, 0.39]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.15395% CI: [-0.93, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.17995% CI: [-0.95, 0.34]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 1 - Total Scorep-value: 0.63195% CI: [-0.55, 0.77]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.0695% CI: [-1.18, 0.14]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.40495% CI: [-0.72, 0.56]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.13595% CI: [-1.06, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12 Part 2 - Total Scorep-value: 0.51495% CI: [-0.7, 0.72]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12

Symptom severity occurring at any challenge dose of peanut protein up to and including 1000 mg during the DBPCFC conducted at Week 12 was categorized as 4 levels: None, Mild, Moderate, Severe. The CoFAR grading system was used to categorize the symptom severity as mild, moderate and severe. Symptom severity for participants who completed DBPCFC without any symptom were categorized as none.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). This outcome measure applies to ligelizumab 120 mg arm, ligelizumab 240 mg arm, and placebo 16-week to ligelizumab 120/240 mg arm (labelled as placebo for efficacy estimands).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12None5 Participants
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Mild15 Participants
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Moderate24 Participants
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Severe3 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Severe2 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12None2 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Moderate37 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Mild10 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Severe8 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Mild2 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12Moderate13 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Maximum Severity of Symptoms Occurring at Any Challenge Dose of Peanut Protein up to and Including 1000 mg at Week 12None0 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.63, 31.56]proportional odds model
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.8, 14.36]proportional odds model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12

Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of \>= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). This outcome measure applies to ligelizumab 120 mg arm, ligelizumab 240 mg arm, and placebo 16-week to ligelizumab 120/240 mg arm (labelled as placebo for efficacy estimands).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 1214 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 126 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 121 Participants
p-value: 0.01895% CI: [1.69, 188.85]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.16495% CI: [0.45, 59.93]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 After 4 Weeks of Treatment

Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of \>= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12 after 4 weeks of treatment (8 weeks of placebo + 4 weeks of ligelizumab treatment versus 12 weeks of placebo). The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 After 4 Weeks of Treatment8 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 After 4 Weeks of Treatment1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of >= 1000 mg (2044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12 After 4 Weeks of Treatment1 Participants
p-value: 0.08295% CI: [0.74, 93.16]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.63295% CI: [0.02, 16.43]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 12

Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating a single dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 12. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms. Participants with treatment discontinuation or missing more than 1 doses of study drug prior to Week 12 due to reasons other than operational complications caused by public health emergency were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). This outcome measure applies to ligelizumab 120 mg arm, ligelizumab 240 mg arm, and placebo 16-week to ligelizumab 120/240 mg arm (labelled as placebo for efficacy estimands).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 127 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 125 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of 3000 mg (5044 mg Cumulative Tolerated Dose) of Peanut Protein Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 121 Participants
p-value: 0.13895% CI: [0.51, 70.08]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.24795% CI: [0.3, 45.56]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52

Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants tolerating the specified peanut protein doses (\>= 600 mg (1044 mg cumulative tolerated dose), \>= 1000 mg (2044 mg cumulative tolerated dose) or 3000 mg (5044 mg cumulative tolerated dose)) of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms during the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) conducted at Week 52. The cumulative tolerated dose is the sum of the tolerated doses, not including the reactive dose. Dose-limiting symptoms indicate a true allergic reaction occurring during administration of a single dose of peanut protein at the DBPCFC that should preclude the administration of any further doses in the view of the investigator. Symptoms that require administration of any rescue medication were considered dose-limiting symptoms.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only participants with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit included. Week 52 includes participants who actually reached Week 52 and who reached any week between Week 12 and Week 52 as the end of treatment visit due to study early termination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD >= 600 mg2 Participants
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD = 3000 mg1 Participants
Ligelizumab 240 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD >= 1000 mg1 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD >= 600 mg1 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD = 3000 mg1 Participants
Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD >= 1000 mg1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD >= 1000 mg0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD >= 600 mg0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD = 3000 mg0 Participants
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD >= 600 mg1 Participants
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD = 3000 mg0 Participants
Placebo 8 Weeks and Ligelizumab 120 mgPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD >= 1000 mg0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Tolerated the Specified Peanut Protein Dose Without Dose-limiting Symptoms at Week 52MTD = 3000 mg0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026