Migraine
Conditions
Keywords
Mobile phone application, Behavioural intervention, Headache outcomes, Medication adherence, Quality of life
Brief summary
Migraine is a common headache disorder and affects 1 in 5 adults during their lifetime. It is a disorder which leads to significantly impaired quality of life, absence from work, loss of productivity in workplace and reduced vitality in social functioning. One of the important cornerstones in the management of migraine is the maintenance of a good headache diary. A headache diary enables the physician to understand the headache characteristics as well to establish the triggers causing the precipitation of episodes. The other important measure to ensure good outcomes is compliance to medications in those who have been prescribed prophylaxis. Migraine prophylaxis is by pills that have to be taken everyday at fixed time to ensure best outcomes. However, it is known that patients with migraine often are not adherent to prophylactic medications. A meta-analysis of 33 studies found that observational studies (n = 14) showed adherence ranging from 41% to 95% at 2 months after initiation of medication and 21% to 80% at 6 months. Pooled rates of persistence derived from 19 RCTs on propranolol, amitriptyline, and topiramate showed adherence rates of 77%, 55%, and 57%, respectively, at 16-26 weeks of initiation. The real world adherence is expected to be lower than that in the ideal settings of randomized trials. Regular pill reminders issued through smartphone based applications can improve medication adherence and thus improve headache outcomes. Though smartphone based migraine tracker digital applications are available, they mostly are aimed at capturing headache characteristics. The efficacy of providing pill reminders along with patient educational materials and community blog to enable migraineurs share their experiences with each other has not been studied in controlled trials. It is known that patients who are well informed about their chronic diseases such as migraine often have better outcomes. Busy clinicians often resort to providing pamphlets regarding the disease, triggers, acute pain relief medications, prophylactic therapy etc. However, it is yet to be studied if a digital application with all these inbuilt features, which are easily accessible at the finger tips would lead to better information uptake and improved compliance and self management. This RCT would try to assess this gap in knowledge.
Detailed description
Migraine is a common headache disorder which leads to significantly impaired quality of life, absence from work, loss of productivity in workplace and reduced vitality in social functioning. A structured migraine diary can be a valuable aid for improving communication between patients and physicians regarding migraine disability and treatment outcomes. The other possible measure to ensure improved outcome in migraine patients is better adherence to prophylactic treatment of migraine. Migraine prophylaxis is by pills that have to be taken every day at fixed time to ensure best outcomes. However, it is known that patients with migraine often are not adherent to prophylactic medications. Regular pill reminders issued through smartphone based applications may help improve medication adherence and hence, headache outcomes. Though smartphone based migraine tracker digital applications are available, they mostly are aimed at capturing headache characteristics. The efficacy of providing pill reminders along with patient educational materials and community blog to enable migraineurs share their experiences with each other has not been studied in controlled trials. It is known that patients who are well informed about their chronic diseases such as migraine often have better outcomes. Busy clinicians often resort to providing pamphlets regarding the disease, triggers, acute pain relief medications, prophylactic therapy etc. However, it is yet to be studied if a digital application with all these inbuilt features, which are easily accessible at the finger tips would lead to better information uptake and improved compliance and self management. This RCT would try to assess this gap in knowledge.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALSmartphone based digital application
Smartphone Based Digital Application to Track Migraine, Offer Pill Reminders for Medication Adherence and Community Blog
Sponsors
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The participant, investigator and care provider will be aware of the intervention and the sequence in which it is administered. The outcomes will be assessed by an outcome assessor who will not be aware of the arm into which the participant was randomized prior to the assessment.
Intervention model description
* A run-in period of 4 weeks prior to randomization to optimize therapy and to document the baseline frequency and severity of headaches. * At the end of run-in period, the patients will be randomly allocated into the smartphone based digital App first arm or the paper diary first arm. The digital app and paper diary- are available in Hindi as well as English. * Randomization will be done by computer generated random number table. * Concealment: The sequence of allocation will be held concealed by opaque sealed envelopes. * Participant and investigator both will be aware of the allocated group - it is an open label study. * Participants will be followed up at 4 weeks and the headache characteristics and outcome parameters would be captured from the app and paper diary respectively. * Subsequently patients would be crossed over to the other arm and 4 weeks after the cross over, parameters would again be assessed.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients attending neurology OPD. * At least 18 years of age; any gender. * Episodic or chronic migraine diagnosed (using International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 (ICHD-3) . * No modifications to the prophylactic therapy or acute pain relief medications is planned over the next 3 months. * Can read and write in Hindi or English easily. * Have an Android/iOS smart phone in which digital application can be installed and who knows how to operate smart phone. * Ready to provide consent and willing to adhere to protocol and comply with follow up visits. * No major neurological or systemic medical condition that reduces life expectancy to less than 1 year based on clinical prediction scores.
Exclusion criteria
* Not willing to adhere to protocol. * Not willing to provide consent. * Inability or unwillingness to complete diary recording. * Patients with Medication over use headache ( as per ICHD -3). * Other primary headaches and secondary headache disorders.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in HIT-6 (Headache impact test-6) score | 4 weeks | To compare the change in HIT-6 (Headache impact test-6 ranges from 36-78 with a higher score indicating greater severity) score from baseline to 4 weeks after introduction of the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary. |
| Reduction in headache days | 4 weeks | To compare the percentage of patients reporting 30 % or more reduction in headache days at 4 weeks following introduction of digital smart phone based application vs paper-pen diary . |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | 4 weeks | The proportion of patients who comply with using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary. |
| Number of headache days per 28 days | 4 weeks | The number of headache days per 28 days following usage of digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary. |
| Change in number of headache days per 28 days from baseline | 4 weeks | The change from baseline in number of headache days per 28 days following usage of digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary . |
| change from baseline in the number of days with severe headaches per 28 days | 4 weeks | The change from baseline in the number of days with severe headaches in the preceding 4 weeks as compared with baseline in patients using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary. |
| Change from baseline in the duration of headache episodes in the preceding 4 weeks | 4 weeks | The change from baseline in the duration of headache episodes in the preceding 4 weeks as compared with baseline in patients using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary |
| Headache severity on VAS (Visual analogue scale) | 4 weeks | Headache severity on VAS scale (0-10 with higher score meaning greater pain) in patients using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary |
| Change from baseline in severity of headache on VAS scale (Visual analogue scale) | 4 weeks | Change from baseline in severity of headache on VAS scale (0-10 with higher score meaning greater pain) in patients using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary |
| Number of headache episodes needing rescue medication | 4 weeks | The number of headache episodes needing rescue medication in patients using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary. |
| Change from baseline in need for rescue medication | 4 weeks | Change from baseline in number of headache episodes needing acute pain relief medications in patients using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary. |
| Omission rates | 4 weeks | Omission rates in daily diary entries in patients using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary. |
| Triggers | 4 weeks | Factors that trigger the onset of headaches (like specific foods, sleep deprivation, travel, etc) in patients using the digital smartphone based application vs paper-pen diary. |
Countries
India
Outcome results
None listed