Skip to content

Mammography and Breast Arterial Calcification: An Information-Sharing Trial

Enhancing the Public Health Benefits of Mammography Screening by Informing Women of Both Breast Cancer and Breast Arterial Calcification Results: A Randomized Trial to Promote Cardiovascular Health

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04983875
Enrollment
5492
Registered
2021-07-30
Start date
2021-09-29
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mammography, Vascular Calcification

Keywords

Mammography, Breast Arterial Calcification, Women's Health, Preventive Medicine, Behavioral Medicine, Screening

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study was to determine the potential benefits of adding information on patients' breast arterial calcification (BAC) results to the standard results letter women receive after mammography. In addition to looking for potential breast cancer, research shows that mammograms can also detect the presence of calcifications within the breast arteries. Those calcifications can be associated with coronary artery disease. Women are not currently routinely told whether or not they have BAC; that is, it's not part of standard national practice to communicate that information to patients. However, previous research has suggested that patients would like to be informed about the BAC status more often. In this study, the team had two goals. First, the team wanted to measure the rates of BAC in a large, representative sample of 5492 women. Second, the study team wanted to understand the effects of providing women with the BAC results as part of the standard post-mammography letter. Specifically, the study team wants to see how sharing BAC information might affect women's healthcare choices and lifestyle. The research includes 527 randomized women in this second part of the study, which is the first in the literature to explore women's reactions to the BAC results. If research shows that women find the information useful, BAC information may be given to women regularly in the future.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBAC-Enhanced Letter

The BAC-Enhanced Letter intervention includes enhancing the standard mammography results letter with a few additional lines of text informing patients of their personal BAC status.

BEHAVIORALWaitlist Control

Patients randomized to this group will receive a standard post-mammography results letter which does not include any information about their personal BAC status. However, participants randomized to this group will be informed of their personal BAC findings at the end of their study participation (approximately 6 months after mammography).

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female * Scheduled to undergo mammography at one of Mount Sinai's breast radiology clinics (e.g., Dubin Breast Center, Radiology Associates) * Age ≥ 40 years * Read and speak English or Spanish * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent * Willing to sign and date any applicable medical record release documents for the study

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with known coronary artery disease (via self-report) * Previous physician-diagnosed heart attack, stroke or TIA, heart failure, angina or taking nitroglycerin, or atrial fibrillation (via self-report or review of EMR) * Inability to understand and comply with the instructions of the study due to the presence of cognitive or psychiatric conditions (such as dementia, psychosis, or mania), compromising ability to provide informed consent and/or follow study procedures * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attendance at a cardiovascular appointmentMonth 6Patients will be asked a YES/NO question asking them to report whether they have seen a healthcare provider to talk about their heart or coronary artery disease in the last six months. Patient's self-report responses will be confirmed via medical record review.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Healthy Heart ScoreBaselineThe Healthy Heart Score is a survey to assess patients' heart healthy behaviors. It assesses age, smoking, body mass index, exercise, alcohol, and a composite diet score. A higher score indicates a greater risk of cardiovascular disease. Score has gender-specific algorithm that estimates 20-year CVD risk (https://healthyheartscore.sph.harvard.edu/) (DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.114.000954): 20-yr CVD risk (%) "Healthy Heart Score" = \[1 - 0. 9660 (exp \[W- 6.57301)\] × 100% where W= 0.10820 x age + 0.15285 (if past smoker) + 0.90138 (if current smoker) + 0.04676 × BMI - 0.01923 × g/d of alcohol + 0.0004 × (g/d of alcohol)2- 0.029251 × hrs/wk of physical activity - 0.05113 × diet score\* 20-yr CVD risk (%) "Healthy Heart Score" = \[1 - 0. 96368 (exp \[W-7.2437)\] × 100% where W= 0.13580 x age- 0.0005 x (age)2 + 0.06979 (if past smoker) + 0.42305 (if current smoker) +0.07424 × BMI - 0.00898 × g/d of alcohol + 0.0001 × (g/d of alcohol)2- 0.01755 × hrs/wk of physical activity - 0.06691 × diet score
Detection of coronary artery disease (CAD)Month 6Participants will respond to a single, self-report item (adapted from the 2019 NHIS survey item) which will ask if they have been told by a doctor or other health professional that they had coronary artery disease in the last 6 months. The item will be rated as, "yes, no, or don't know." Self-reported diagnosis will be confirmed via medical record review.
Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)Week 1Illness representations will be assessed using the IPQ-R which have been adapted to include an addendum of Cardiovascular-Disease Related Worry Scale questions. Participants will be asked to rate items related to personal beliefs about CAD with regard to causal beliefs and on 8 subscales: identity (scale 0-13); timeline (scale 6-30); consequences (scale 6-30); personal control (scale 6-30); treatment control (scale 5-25); illness coherence (scale5-25); timeline cyclical (scale 4-20); and emotional representations (scale 6-30); and CVD related worry scale (scale3-13). Full scale from 41-216, higher scores represent a higher number of symptoms related to CAD, more positive beliefs about the controllability of disease, and a greater personal understanding of the condition.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGuy H. Montgomery, Ph.D.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026