Cervical Disc Degenerative Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
artificial cervical disc, degenerative disc disease, total disc replacement, Spinal Kinetics
Brief summary
Prospective, concurrently controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Spinal Kinetics M6-C™ artificial cervical disc compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of contiguous two-level symptomatic cervical radiculopathy at vertebral levels from C3 to C7 with or without spinal cord compression.
Detailed description
Patients will be concurrently enrolled in the M6-C treatment group and the ACDF control group. Patients should have failed at least six weeks of conservative treatment or demonstrate progressive symptoms despite continued non-operative treatment. For the study, 263 patients will undergo either a two-level cervical artificial disc procedure, or an instrumented (ACDF) procedure as per site group assignment. Patients will be evaluated clinically, radiographically, and via the collection of patient-reported outcomes at 6 Weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months and 24 Months. The primary endpoint is Overall Success at 24 Months.
Interventions
An incision will be made in the front of the neck and the damaged disc located between cervical vertebrae (neck bones) will be removed so that the M6-C artificial cervical disc can be placed into the space where the damaged disc was removed. This procedure will be performed using x-ray technology (fluoroscopy) guide the surgeon in placement of the M6-C in between the cervical vertebrae. This process will be repeated to replace the second damaged disc.
DEVICEACDF
One of four FDA-approved cervical plate systems will be used for the ACDF. An incision will be made in the front of the neck and the damaged disc located between cervical vertebrae (neck bones) will be removed. Then, a piece of donor bone will be placed in the space where the damaged disc was removed and a metal plate will be screwed into the bones above and below the disc. This procedure will be performed using x-ray technology (fluoroscopy) to guide the surgeon in the placement of the cervical plate system. This process will be repeated to treat the other damaged disc.
Sponsors
Spinal Kinetics
Orthofix Inc.
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Masking description
Participants will be assigned a treatment group by enrolling site and will not be blinded to the treatment group assignment before their surgery. Investigator, and site will not be blinded to treatment assignment due to the need to prepare for the respective surgery associated with the treatment assignment.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of degenerative cervical radiculopathy with or without spinal cord compression requiring surgical treatment at two contiguous levels from C3 to C7 demonstrated by signs and/or symptoms of disc herniation and/or osteophyte formation (e.g. neck and/or arm pain, radiculopathy, etc.) and is confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies (e.g. MRI, CT, x-rays, etc.) * Inadequate response to conservative medical care over a period of at least 6 weeks or have the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of continued non-operative management * Neck Disability Index score of ≥ 30% (raw score of ≥ 15/50) * Neck or arm pain Visual Analog Scale Score ≥ 4 on a scale of 0 to 10 * Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements * Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent * Skeletally mature and at least 18 years old but not older than 75 years old
Exclusion criteria
* More than two cervical levels requiring surgery, or two non-contiguous levels requiring surgery * Previous anterior cervical spine surgery * Axial neck pain as the solitary symptom * Previous posterior cervical spine surgery (such as a posterior element decompression) that destabilizes the cervical spine * Advanced cervical anatomical deformity (such as ankylosing spondylitis, scoliosis) at either of the operative levels or adjacent levels * Symptomatic facet arthrosis * Less than four degrees of motion in flexion/extension at either of the index levels * Instability as evidenced by subluxation greater than 3 millimeters at either of the index or adjacent levels as indicated on flexion/extension x-rays. * Advanced degenerative changes (e.g., spondylosis) at either of the index vertebral levels as evidenced by bridging osteophytes, central disc height less than 4 millimeters and/or \< 50% of the adjacent normal intervertebral disc, or kyphotic deformity \> 11 degrees on neutral x-rays * Severe cervical myelopathy (i.e., Nurick's Classification greater than 2) * Active systemic infection or infection at the operative site * Co-morbid medical conditions of the spine or upper extremities that may affect the cervical spine neurological and/or pain assessment * Metabolic bone disease such as osteoporosis that contradicts spinal surgery * History of an osteoporotic fracture of the spine, hip or wrist * History of an endocrine or metabolic disorder (e.g. Paget's disease) known to affect bone and mineral metabolism * Taking medications that may interfere with bony/soft tissue healing including chronic steroid use * Known allergy to titanium, stainless steels, polyurethane, polyethylene, or ethylene oxide residuals * Fibromyalgia, Rheumatoid Arthritis (or other autoimmune disease), or a systemic disorder such as HIV or acute hepatitis B or C. * Insulin dependent diabetes * Medical condition (e.g., unstable cardiac disease, cancer) that may result in patient death or have an effect on outcomes prior to study completion * Pregnant, or intend to become pregnant, during the course of the study * Severe obesity (Body Mass Index greater than 45) * Physical or mental condition (e.g. psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, alcohol or drug addiction) that would interfere with patient self-assessment of function, pain or quality of life. * Involved in current or pending spinal litigation where permanent disability benefits are being sought. * Incarcerated at time of study enrollment * Current participation in other investigational study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Impairment - Neck Disability Index Score (NDI) | 24 Month | Change in condition-specific functional impairment will be evaluated using a 10 item NDI outcomes questionnaire to assess change in the functional impairment score. NDI scores range from 0-50 (0%-100%) with higher scores demonstrating greater disability. |
| Overall Participant Success Rate (M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc) | 24 Month | \- Participant success is a composite endpoint of all of the listed Primary Outcome Measures. |
| - Serious Adverse Event(s) | 24 Month | No serious adverse events classified as device or device procedure related (as determined by the Clinical Events Committee). |
| - Additional Surgical Intervention | 24 Month | No supplemental surgical procedure at the index level(s) including supplemental fixation, revision and/or device removal. |
| - Neurologic Function | 24 Month | Maintenance or improvement in neurological function as determined by Clinical Events Committee review of neurological exam results. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Satisfaction | 24 Month | A brief Participant Satisfaction Questionnaire (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied) regarding the outcome of their surgery at two-years. |
| Neck and Arm Pain | 24 Month | Change in severity of neck and arm pain will be evaluated on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Zero = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain. |
| Pain Medication Usage | 24 Months | Change in usage of post-operative pain medications specifically prescribed for cervical spine will be documented. |
| Health-Related Quality of Life | 24 Month | Maintenance or improvement of health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the SF-12v2 Health Survey. |
| Radiographic Assessments | 24 Month | Quantitative and qualitative assessments compared to baseline evaluating surgical success outcomes for both cohorts. |
| FOSS Dysphagia Scale | 24 Month | The five-stage Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) will be used to determine presence/absence of post-operative oropharyngeal dysphagia and severity of the disorder and outcome. On the 0 to 4 FOSS scale, 0=normal; asymptomatic, whereas 5=severe dysphagia; nonoral feeding. |
| Odom's Criteria | 24 Month | Physician assessment of the clinical disposition of a participant at two-years using the 4-point rating scale (excellent, good, satisfactory, poor) for assessing the clinical outcome after cervical spine surgery. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed