Femoroacetabular Impingement
Conditions
Brief summary
To assess the feasibility of using intraoperative ultrasound to evaluate the femoral head formation; to evaluate the improvement of the forming effect using the intraoperative ultrasound combined with c-arm.
Detailed description
Ultrasound can provide a multi-directional scan of the femoral head and neck junction, and the range of evaluation is larger than that of the intraoperative c-arm. The study was to assess the feasibility of using intraoperative ultrasound to evaluate the femoral head formation; to evaluate the forming of the femoral head and the improvement of the forming effect using the intraoperative ultrasound combined with c-arm.
Interventions
DEVICEultrasound evaluation
According to the sequential test, the enrolled patients were divided into ultrasound evaluation group and no ultrasound evaluation group.
Sponsors
Peking University Third Hospital
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with hip pain; * Cam type (alpha Angle \> 50°) impingement and glenoid labrum laceration
Exclusion criteria
* Previous hip surgery; * Patients with subosseous cystic degeneration of synovitis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| VAS scale | 1 year after operation | Visual analogue scale（VAS）was used to measure the pain score. The minimum and maximum values were 0 and 10. The higher score, the worse pain. |
| MHHS scale | 1 year after operation | Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) scale was used to measure the symptoms of joint. The minimum and maximum values were 0 and 91. The higher score, the better. |
| Hip CT | 1 day after operation | Routine postoperative hip CT was used to understand the joint morphology. |
| Hip X-ray | 1 day after operation | Routine hip X-ray at the Dunn position was conducted. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed