Skip to content

A Study to Test Whether BI 706321 Combined With Ustekinumab Helps People With Crohn's Disease

A Phase IIa, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of BI 706321 Orally Administered for 12 Weeks in Patients With Crohn's Disease (CD) Receiving Ustekinumab Induction Treatment

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04978493
Enrollment
49
Registered
2021-07-27
Start date
2021-12-02
Completion date
2024-08-08
Last updated
2025-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease

Brief summary

This study is open to adults, aged 18-75 years, with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. The purpose of this study is to find out whether BI 706321 combined with ustekinumab helps people with Crohn's disease. BI 706321 is a medicine being developed to treat Crohn's disease. Ustekinumab is a medicine already used to treat Crohn's disease. Participants are put into 2 groups randomly, which means by chance. One group gets BI 706321 and ustekinumab. The other group gets placebo and ustekinumab. Participants take BI 706321 or placebo as tablets every day. Placebo tablets look like BI 706321 tablets but do not contain any medicine. Ustekinumab is given as an infusion into a vein once at the beginning of the study. After that, ustekinumab is given as an injection under the skin every 2 months. Participants take BI 706321 or placebo in combination with ustekinumab for 3 months. After that, participants receive only ustekinumab for another 9 months. Participants are in the study for about 1 year. During this time, they visit the study site about 13 times. At 3 of the visits, doctors do a colonoscopy to examine the bowel. The results from the colonoscopies are compared between the 2 groups. The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.

Interventions

DRUGUstekinumab

A single intravenous infusion of 260 mg (body weight ≤55 kg), 390 mg (body weight 55-85 kg), or 520 mg (body weight \>85 kg) was administered on Day 0, followed by subcutaneous injection of 90 mg every 8 weeks.

One dose of 8 mg as tablets orally once per day in the morning

DRUGPlacebo

One dose of placebo matching BI 706321 as tablets orally once per day in the morning

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Ustekinumab treatment is open-label for the Sponsor, patients and investigator/site staff.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Crohn Disease (CD) for at least 3 months prior to visit 1, as confirmed at any time in the past by endoscopy and/OR, radiology, and supported by histology. * Elevated C-reactive protein (≥ 5 mg/L) OR elevated fecal calprotectin (≥ 250 µg/g) * Symptomatic CD defined as Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≥150. * Presence of mucosal ulcers in at least one segment of the ileum or colon and a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) score ≥ 7 (for patients with isolated ileitis ≥4). * Patients who are experienced at least 1 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists at a dose approved for CD. Patients may have stopped TNF antagonist treatment due to primary or secondary non-responsiveness, intolerance, or for other reasons. * May be receiving a therapeutic dose of the following: * Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compounds must have been at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to randomisation and must continue on this dose until week 12 and/or * Oral corticosteroids if indicated for treatment of CD must be at a prednisone equivalent dose of ≤ 20 mg/day, or ≤ 9 mg/day of budesonide, and have been at a stable dose for at least 2 weeks immediately prior to randomisation and must continue on this dose until week 12. and/or * Azathioprine (AZA), mercaptopurine (MP), or methotrexate (MTX), provided that dose has been stable for the 8 weeks immediately prior to randomisation and must continue on this dose until week 12. * Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control. * Further inclusion criteria apply

Exclusion criteria

* Have any current or prior abscesses, unless they have been drained and treated at least 6 weeks prior to randomisation and are not anticipated to require surgery. Patients with active fistulas may be included if there is no anticipation of a need for surgery and there are currently no abscesses present based on investigator's judgement. * Have complications of CD such as strictures, stenosis, short bowel syndrome, or any other manifestation that might require surgery, or could preclude the use of SES-CD/CDAI to assess response to therapy, or would possibly confound the evaluation of benefit from treatment with BI 706321 (based on investigator's judgement). * Patient with an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnosis other than CD. * Have had any kind of bowel resection or diversion within 4 months or any other intra-abdominal surgery within 3 months prior to visit 1. Patients with current ileostomy, colostomy, or ileorectal anastomosis are excluded. * Treatment with: * Any non-biologic medication for IBD (e.g.tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil, systemic corticosteroids), other than those allowed per inclusion criteria, within 30 days prior to randomisation * Any biologic treatment with a TNF-alpha antagonist (adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol) or vedolizumab (or a biosimilar of these drugs) within 4 weeks prior to randomisation. (If drug level testing for previously used biologic treatment confirms no detectable drug level before randomisation, patient can be enrolled despite not having completed 4 week from last treatment.) * Any previous treatment with ustekinumab (or a biosimilar of this drug) * Any previous treatment with an investigational (or subsequently approved) non-biologic/biologic drug for CD (including but not limited to JAK inhibitors \[e.g. upadacitinib\], S1P modulators, IL-23 inhibitors \[e.g. risankizumab\], antiintegrins). * Any investigational drug for an indication other than CD during the course of the actual study and within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to randomisation. * Any prior exposure to rituximab within 1 year prior to randomisation. * Positive stool examination for C difficile or other intestinal pathogens \<30 days prior to randomization * Evidence of colonic moderate/severe mucosal dysplasia or colonic adenomas, unless properly removed * Increased risk of infectious complications (e.g. recent pyogenic infection, any congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (e.g. human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)), past organ or stem cell transplantation (with exception of a corneal transplant \> 12 weeks prior to screening) or have ever received stem cell therapy (e.g., Prochymal). Prior treatment with a somatic cell therapy product (e.g., Alofisel) is not excluded, provided it was administered \> 8 weeks prior to randomisation. * Live or attenuated vaccination within 4 weeks prior to randomisation. * Presence of clinically significant acute or chronic infections not otherwise listed, including viral hepatitis, COVID-19, or others based on investigator's judgement. * A marked baseline prolongation of QT/QTc interval (such as QTcF intervals that are greater than 450 ms for men, 470 ms for female) or any other relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) finding at screening. Both have to be confirmed by repeated ECG recording. * Further

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) at Week 12Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and 12 weeks after first drug administration.Absolute change from baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) at Week 12 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The analysis was a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). For the ANCOVA model, absolute change in SES-CD score was the dependent variable, treatment group and baseline corticosteroid use (yes/no) were fixed effects and baseline SES-CD score was a continuous covariate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Endoscopic Response (Defined as >50% SES-CD Reduction From Baseline, or for an Induction Baseline SES-CD of 4, at Least a 2 Point Reduction From Induction Baseline) at Week 12Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and 12 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with endoscopic response (defined as \>50% Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) reduction from baseline, or for an induction baseline SES-CD of 4, at least a 2 point reduction from induction baseline) at Week 12 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.
Percentage of Patients With Endoscopic Response (Defined as >50% SES-CD Reduction From Baseline, or for an Induction Baseline SES-CD of 4, at Least a 2 Point Reduction From Induction Baseline) at Week 48Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and 48 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with endoscopic response (defined as \>50% Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) reduction from baseline, or for an induction baseline SES-CD of 4, at least a 2 point reduction from induction baseline) at Week 48 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.
Percentage of Patients With Endoscopic Remission (Defined as SES-CD Score of ≤2) at Week 1212 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with endoscopic remission (defined as Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) score of ≤2) at Week 12 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.
Percentage of Patients With Endoscopic Remission (Defined as SES-CD Score of ≤2) at Week 4848 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with endoscopic remission (defined as Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) score of ≤2) at Week 48 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.
Percentage of Patients With Biological Remission, Defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L and Faecal Calprotectin (FCP) < 250 ug/g at Week 1212 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with biological remission, defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) \< 5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin (FCP) \< 250 ug/g at Week 12 is reported. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.
Percent Change in SES-CD From Baseline at Week 12Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and 12 weeks after first drug administration.Percent change in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) from baseline at Week 12 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The analysis was a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). For the ANCOVA model, absolute change in SES-CD score was the dependent variable, treatment group and baseline corticosteroid use (yes/no) were fixed effects and baseline SES-CD score was a continuous covariate.
Percentage of Patients With Clinical Remission at Week 12, Defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of <150Data was collected for 7 days prior to 12 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with clinical remission at Week 12, defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of \<150 is reported. The CDAI is comprised of eight variables which are summed after adjustment with a weighting factor, and the total score ranges from 0 to approximately 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. For certain variables (daily number of liquid or very soft stools, daily abdominal pain, daily general well-being, fever over 37.8 Celsius, taking medication for diarrhea) the average over 7 days was taken. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.
Percentage of Patients With Clinical Remission at Week 48, Defined as a CDAI Score of <150Data was collected for 7 days prior to 48 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with clinical remission at Week 48, defined as a CDAI score of \<150 is reported. The CDAI is comprised of eight variables which are summed after adjustment with a weighting factor, and the total score ranges from 0 to approximately 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. For certain variables (daily number of liquid or very soft stools, daily abdominal pain, daily general well-being, fever over 37.8 Celsius, taking medication for diarrhea) the average over 7 days was taken. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.
Percentage of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 12, Defined by a CDAI Reduction From Baseline of at Least 100 Points, or a CDAI Score of <150Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and for 7 days prior to 12 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with clinical response at Week 12, defined by a CDAI reduction from baseline of at least 100 points, or a CDAI score of \<150 is reported. The CDAI is comprised of eight variables which are summed after adjustment with a weighting factor, and the total score ranges from 0 to approximately 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. For certain variables (daily number of liquid or very soft stools, daily abdominal pain, daily general well-being, fever over 37.8 Celsius, taking medication for diarrhea) the average over 7 days was taken. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through End of Treatment (EoT) and the REP PeriodFrom first drug administration until 16 days after last drug administration, up to 27 weeks.Number of patients with treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) through end of treatment (EoT) and the REP period is reported.
Percentage of Patients With Biological Remission, Defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L and Faecal Calprotectin (FCP) < 250 ug/g at Week 4848 weeks after first drug administration.Percentage of patients with biological remission, defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) \< 5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin (FCP) \< 250 ug/g at Week 48 is reported. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a Phase IIa, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of male and female patients with Crohn's Disease (CD), using BI 706321 therapy in combination with a backbone ustekinumab induction regimen.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Subjects attended a specialist site which ensured that they (the subjects) met all inclusion and no exclusion criteria. Subjects were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any entry criteria were violated. Subjects signed and dated an informed consent form according to local regulatory and legal requirements, and were informed that they were free to withdraw their consent at any time without penalty or prejudice.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BI 706321 and Ustekinumab
Participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's Disease (CD) administered one dose of 8 milligram (mg) BI 706321 as tablets orally once per day in the morning for 12 weeks in conjunction with standard induction dosing of ustekinumab, followed by ustekinumab maintenance dosing for an additional 36 weeks. A single intravenous infusion of 260 mg ustekinumab (body weight ≤55 kilogram \[kg\]), 390 mg ustekinumab (body weight 55-85 kg), or 520 mg ustekinumab (body weight \>85 kg) was administered on Day 0, followed by subcutaneous injection of 90 mg ustekinumab every 8 weeks.
24
Placebo and Ustekinumab
Participants with moderately to severely active CD administered one dose of placebo matching BI 706321 as tablets orally once per day in the morning for 12 weeks in conjunction with standard induction dosing of ustekinumab, followed by ustekinumab maintenance dosing for an additional 36 weeks. A single intravenous infusion of 260 mg ustekinumab (body weight ≤55 kilogram \[kg\]), 390 mg ustekinumab (body weight 55-85 kg), or 520 mg ustekinumab (body weight \>85 kg) was administered on Day 0, followed by subcutaneous injection of 90 mg ustekinumab every 8 weeks.
25
Total49

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyNo reason available01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBI 706321 and UstekinumabTotalPlacebo and Ustekinumab
Age, Continuous38.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
43.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
47.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants46 Participants25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants44 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants23 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants26 Participants12 Participants
Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD)14.1 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
13.0 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
12.0 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 246 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 241 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) at Week 12

Absolute change from baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) at Week 12 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The analysis was a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). For the ANCOVA model, absolute change in SES-CD score was the dependent variable, treatment group and baseline corticosteroid use (yes/no) were fixed effects and baseline SES-CD score was a continuous covariate.

Time frame: Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and 12 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If a subject discontinued after 6 weeks and had an assessment during the Week 8 visit window, the change in SES-CD score at Week 8 was carried forward to the Week 12 time point and used. If there was no post-baseline endoscopic assessment, baseline value was carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) at Week 12-1.69 Score on a scale
Placebo and UstekinumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) at Week 12-3.62 Score on a scale
Comparison: The analysis was a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). For the ANCOVA model, absolute change in SES-CD score was the dependent variable, treatment group and baseline corticosteroid use (yes/no) were fixed effects and baseline SES-CD score was a continuous covariate.95% CI: [-0.99, 4.84]
Secondary

Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through End of Treatment (EoT) and the REP Period

Number of patients with treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) through end of treatment (EoT) and the REP period is reported.

Time frame: From first drug administration until 16 days after last drug administration, up to 27 weeks.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabNumber of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through End of Treatment (EoT) and the REP Period11 Participants
Placebo and UstekinumabNumber of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through End of Treatment (EoT) and the REP Period12 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Biological Remission, Defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L and Faecal Calprotectin (FCP) < 250 ug/g at Week 12

Percentage of patients with biological remission, defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) \< 5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin (FCP) \< 250 ug/g at Week 12 is reported. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: 12 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Biological Remission, Defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L and Faecal Calprotectin (FCP) < 250 ug/g at Week 1216.7 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Biological Remission, Defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L and Faecal Calprotectin (FCP) < 250 ug/g at Week 1220.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-24.91, 18.85]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Biological Remission, Defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L and Faecal Calprotectin (FCP) < 250 ug/g at Week 48

Percentage of patients with biological remission, defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) \< 5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin (FCP) \< 250 ug/g at Week 48 is reported. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: 48 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Biological Remission, Defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L and Faecal Calprotectin (FCP) < 250 ug/g at Week 4812.5 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Biological Remission, Defined as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L and Faecal Calprotectin (FCP) < 250 ug/g at Week 4816.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-23.86, 17.34]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Clinical Remission at Week 12, Defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of <150

Percentage of patients with clinical remission at Week 12, defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of \<150 is reported. The CDAI is comprised of eight variables which are summed after adjustment with a weighting factor, and the total score ranges from 0 to approximately 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. For certain variables (daily number of liquid or very soft stools, daily abdominal pain, daily general well-being, fever over 37.8 Celsius, taking medication for diarrhea) the average over 7 days was taken. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: Data was collected for 7 days prior to 12 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Clinical Remission at Week 12, Defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of <15037.5 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Clinical Remission at Week 12, Defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of <15056.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-42.32, 8.89]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Clinical Remission at Week 48, Defined as a CDAI Score of <150

Percentage of patients with clinical remission at Week 48, defined as a CDAI score of \<150 is reported. The CDAI is comprised of eight variables which are summed after adjustment with a weighting factor, and the total score ranges from 0 to approximately 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. For certain variables (daily number of liquid or very soft stools, daily abdominal pain, daily general well-being, fever over 37.8 Celsius, taking medication for diarrhea) the average over 7 days was taken. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: Data was collected for 7 days prior to 48 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Clinical Remission at Week 48, Defined as a CDAI Score of <15020.8 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Clinical Remission at Week 48, Defined as a CDAI Score of <15020.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-21.53, 23.41]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 12, Defined by a CDAI Reduction From Baseline of at Least 100 Points, or a CDAI Score of <150

Percentage of patients with clinical response at Week 12, defined by a CDAI reduction from baseline of at least 100 points, or a CDAI score of \<150 is reported. The CDAI is comprised of eight variables which are summed after adjustment with a weighting factor, and the total score ranges from 0 to approximately 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. For certain variables (daily number of liquid or very soft stools, daily abdominal pain, daily general well-being, fever over 37.8 Celsius, taking medication for diarrhea) the average over 7 days was taken. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and for 7 days prior to 12 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 12, Defined by a CDAI Reduction From Baseline of at Least 100 Points, or a CDAI Score of <15045.8 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 12, Defined by a CDAI Reduction From Baseline of at Least 100 Points, or a CDAI Score of <15068.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-45.42, 5.19]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Endoscopic Remission (Defined as SES-CD Score of ≤2) at Week 12

Percentage of patients with endoscopic remission (defined as Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) score of ≤2) at Week 12 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: 12 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Endoscopic Remission (Defined as SES-CD Score of ≤2) at Week 124.2 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Endoscopic Remission (Defined as SES-CD Score of ≤2) at Week 128.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-21.14, 13.25]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Endoscopic Remission (Defined as SES-CD Score of ≤2) at Week 48

Percentage of patients with endoscopic remission (defined as Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) score of ≤2) at Week 48 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: 48 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Endoscopic Remission (Defined as SES-CD Score of ≤2) at Week 488.3 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Endoscopic Remission (Defined as SES-CD Score of ≤2) at Week 488.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-17.67, 18.78]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Endoscopic Response (Defined as >50% SES-CD Reduction From Baseline, or for an Induction Baseline SES-CD of 4, at Least a 2 Point Reduction From Induction Baseline) at Week 12

Percentage of patients with endoscopic response (defined as \>50% Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) reduction from baseline, or for an induction baseline SES-CD of 4, at least a 2 point reduction from induction baseline) at Week 12 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and 12 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Endoscopic Response (Defined as >50% SES-CD Reduction From Baseline, or for an Induction Baseline SES-CD of 4, at Least a 2 Point Reduction From Induction Baseline) at Week 1212.5 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Endoscopic Response (Defined as >50% SES-CD Reduction From Baseline, or for an Induction Baseline SES-CD of 4, at Least a 2 Point Reduction From Induction Baseline) at Week 1240.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-48.42, -2.64]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Endoscopic Response (Defined as >50% SES-CD Reduction From Baseline, or for an Induction Baseline SES-CD of 4, at Least a 2 Point Reduction From Induction Baseline) at Week 48

Percentage of patients with endoscopic response (defined as \>50% Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) reduction from baseline, or for an induction baseline SES-CD of 4, at least a 2 point reduction from induction baseline) at Week 48 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The method to provide confidence intervals for single proportions is based on the Wilson method.

Time frame: Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and 48 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If there were data at visits before and after one with a missing outcome, data was imputed as success only if both neighboring visits represented a success, independently of whether the before and after observations were selected for analysis based on the pre-defined time windows.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Endoscopic Response (Defined as >50% SES-CD Reduction From Baseline, or for an Induction Baseline SES-CD of 4, at Least a 2 Point Reduction From Induction Baseline) at Week 4816.7 Percentage of patients
Placebo and UstekinumabPercentage of Patients With Endoscopic Response (Defined as >50% SES-CD Reduction From Baseline, or for an Induction Baseline SES-CD of 4, at Least a 2 Point Reduction From Induction Baseline) at Week 4816.0 Percentage of patients
Comparison: Unadjusted risk difference between treatment groups were calculated simply as the difference in the observed percentage of patients. The method to provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted risk differences was derived from the Newcombe method.95% CI: [-20.49, 22.12]
Secondary

Percent Change in SES-CD From Baseline at Week 12

Percent change in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) from baseline at Week 12 is reported. The SES-CD is a numerical grading system composed of 4 variables (presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowings) recorded sequentially in 5 segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, ileum. Each variable is assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the total score, ranging from 0 to 56, is obtained by adding each variable. Higher values indicate worse endoscopic inflammation. To achieve a score of 56, the maximum score for the presence of narrowings variable has to be be 2 (not 3) for the four segments leading up to the ileum. The analysis was a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). For the ANCOVA model, absolute change in SES-CD score was the dependent variable, treatment group and baseline corticosteroid use (yes/no) were fixed effects and baseline SES-CD score was a continuous covariate.

Time frame: Within 28 days before randomization (baseline) and 12 weeks after first drug administration.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication and have analyzable post-baseline data (observed or imputed) in at least 1 efficacy/biological/histological parameter. If a subject discontinued after 6 weeks and had an assessment during the Week 8 visit window, the change in SES-CD score at Week 8 was carried forward to the Week 12 time point and used. If there was no post-baseline endoscopic assessment, baseline value was carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BI 706321 and UstekinumabPercent Change in SES-CD From Baseline at Week 12-14.18 Percent change
Placebo and UstekinumabPercent Change in SES-CD From Baseline at Week 12-27.52 Percent change
Comparison: The analysis was a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). For the ANCOVA model, absolute change in SES-CD score was the dependent variable, treatment group and baseline corticosteroid use (yes/no) were fixed effects and baseline SES-CD score was a continuous covariate.95% CI: [-9.46, 36.14]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026