Pediatric Obesity
Conditions
Keywords
Obesity prevention, Behavioral intervention, Health disparities, Trauma informed, Child nutrition, Responsive feeding, Infant
Brief summary
Infants from underserved and minority backgrounds are at increased risk for obesity and poor feeding and nutrition outcomes, but obesity prevention programs tailored specifically to the needs of these infants are lacking. The current study takes a community-engaged approach to development and delivery of an adaptively tailored obesity prevention program delivered via home visiting to target infant eating and feeding (Healthy Eating for My Infant; HEMI).
Detailed description
Poor dietary habits and obesity-risk begin early in infancy. Infants from underserved and minority backgrounds experience disparate rates of poor nutritional outcomes and subsequent health disparities related to obesity. Each infant and their family experiences a unique set of risk factors and barriers to healthy eating. However, obesity prevention programs that are culturally and contextually relevant for underserved families and adapted based on the needs of individual families are lacking. The current study will develop an obesity prevention program, Healthy Eating for My Infant (HEMI), using a community-engaged approach involving community members in development and delivery of the program. HEMI targets healthy infant feeding through six monthly sessions with infants 3-8 months old. The program will be delivered as a supplement to an already existing evidence-based home visiting program, Every Child Succeeds (ECS), serving families with primarily low income and ethnic/racial minority backgrounds. Development of an adaptive and effective obesity prevention program meeting the needs of underserved infants is critical for addressing health disparities in infant eating and obesity.
Interventions
The intervention targets problem solving to overcome barriers, behavioral rehearsal and practice of healthy behaviors, promoting readiness to change, goal setting, self-monitoring, and behavioral tracking. Two standard treatment modules will be provided to each family by a study interventionist focusing on infant nutritional requirements, responsive feeding, and mealtime behaviors. Two additional treatment modules will be selected to address the unique needs articulated by each family (e.g., food insecurity, eating healthy on a limited income, emotional eating, engaging other caregivers, maternal mental health). Modules will consider the influence of maternal trauma history and mental health on feeding and eating behavior. The intervention also includes two peer counselor-led sessions during which families can discuss implementation of recommendations and barriers to change with a member of their community who can problem solve and support change.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Infants will be assigned to either the treatment or control condition (standard care).
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Infant enrolled in the Every Child Succeeds (ECS) program * Infant age is \< 2 months at study recruitment * Infant born at \> 37 weeks gestation * Infant is a singleton * Maternal age is \> 18 years (in order to consent for child to participate) * Mother is fluent in English or Spanish
Exclusion criteria
* Infant has a major medical condition that requires specialized feeding
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Group Differences in Infant BMI | The measure of group differences in infant BMI will be completed at post-treatment (when the child is 9 months of age). | Families receiving the program will be compared to infants in control families who receive standard ECS content only to determine which group has a lower proportion of infants with Body Mass Index greater than or equal to the 85th percentile. Anthropometrics were measured in triplicate using a calibrated mobile digital SECA baby scale and portable infant length board. Infants were weighed in a clean diaper without clothes to the nearest 1 gram. All length measurements were performed by two team members. Infant BMI standardized for age and sex was calculated from the WHO 2005 growth standards to obtain BMI percentile. Percentiles under the 5th percentile are considered underweight, percentiles between 5th- 85th percentile are considered healthy weight, percentiles 85th- 95th percentile are considered overweight, and percentiles equal to or greater than the 95th percentile are considered obesity. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Group Differences in Infant Diet Quality | The measure of infant diet will be completed within 2 weeks of the baseline visit (when the child is 2 months of age) and again within 2 weeks of the post-treatment visit (when the child is 9 months of age). | Diet will be assessed via three random dietary recall interviews conducted with mothers by phone. Trained interviewers, blinded to participant study condition, will employ the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) automated multiple-pass method (AMPM), a standardized interview approach. Differences between the control and intervention group on diet quality (Healthy Eating Index; HEI) at post-treatment were calculated. Scores range from 0- 100 with higher scores representing greater diet quality. Footnote: Originally proposed study outcomes included examination of pre-post changes in diet by treatment group (e.g., food groups) but this analysis was not possible because at baseline infants were 2 months of age and not yet consuming any solid foods. |
| Group Differences in Infant Diet Diversity | The measure of infant diet will be completed within 2 weeks of the baseline visit (when the child is 2 months of age) and again within 2 weeks of the post-treatment visit (when the child is 9 months of age). | Diet will be assessed via three random dietary recall interviews conducted with mothers by phone within 2 weeks of the baseline and post-treatment study visit dates. Trained interviewers, blinded to participant study condition, will employ the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) automated multiple-pass method (AMPM), a standardized interview approach. Differences between the control and intervention group on diet diversity (Minimum Diet Diversity) at post-treatment were calculated. Adequate MDD is defined as consuming a food from 4 or more of seven food groups in any amount during the prior 24 hours (possible score range 0- 7). Footnote: Originally proposed study outcomes included examination of pre-post changes in diet by treatment group (e.g., food groups) but this analysis was not possible because at baseline infants were 2 months of age and not yet consuming any solid foods. |
| Treatment Acceptability | The measure of feedback on the intervention will be completed at post-treatment (when the child is 9 months of age). | Family perception of program acceptability was reported using an established questionnaire assessing components of the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA; Timm et al., 2022) with minor wording adaptations to better fit the HEMI program. The total measure included 3 subscale scores: Affective attitude and effectiveness, coherence and understanding, and perceived burden (Timm et al., 2022). A single overall acceptability question was also included. Scores were scaled to 100 with a score of 100 representing highest acceptability and 20 representing the lowest acceptability. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention Participants and their parents will participate in a 6 session intervention targeting healthy introduction of complementary foods, and responsive feeding and mealtime behaviors. Intervention sessions will occur when the infant is 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 months of age.
Healthy Eating for My Infant: The intervention targets problem solving to overcome barriers, behavioral rehearsal and practice of healthy behaviors, promoting readiness to change, goal setting, self-monitoring, and behavioral tracking. Two standard treatment modules will be provided to each family by a study interventionist focusing on infant nutritional requirements, responsive feeding, and mealtime behaviors. Two additional treatment modules will be selected to address the unique needs articulated by each family (e.g., food insecurity, eating healthy on a limited income, emotional eating, engaging other caregivers, maternal mental health). Modules will consider the influence of maternal trauma history and mental health on feeding and eating behavior. The intervention also includes two peer counselor-led sessions during which families can discuss implementation of recommendations and barriers to change with a member of their community who can problem solve and support change. | 15 |
| Control Participants and their parents will complete baseline and post-treatment study visits to assess study outcomes. They will receive no intervention. | 15 |
| Total | 30 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 71.67 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.42 | 73.53 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.93 | 72.60 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.07 |
| Birthweight | 118.33 oz STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.74 | 111.53 oz STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.86 | 114.93 oz STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.48 |
| Body Mass Index Percentile (calculated from WHO Growth Charts) | 51.69 percentile STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.41 | 53.85 percentile STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.95 | 52.77 percentile STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.2 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 9 Participants | 9 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 15 participants | 15 participants | 30 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 9 Participants | 19 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 14 / 15 | 9 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 15 | 4 / 15 |
Outcome results
Group Differences in Infant BMI
Families receiving the program will be compared to infants in control families who receive standard ECS content only to determine which group has a lower proportion of infants with Body Mass Index greater than or equal to the 85th percentile. Anthropometrics were measured in triplicate using a calibrated mobile digital SECA baby scale and portable infant length board. Infants were weighed in a clean diaper without clothes to the nearest 1 gram. All length measurements were performed by two team members. Infant BMI standardized for age and sex was calculated from the WHO 2005 growth standards to obtain BMI percentile. Percentiles under the 5th percentile are considered underweight, percentiles between 5th- 85th percentile are considered healthy weight, percentiles 85th- 95th percentile are considered overweight, and percentiles equal to or greater than the 95th percentile are considered obesity.
Time frame: The measure of group differences in infant BMI will be completed at post-treatment (when the child is 9 months of age).
Population: Was the participants post BMI \> 85th
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Group Differences in Infant BMI | participants post BMI > 85th | 5 Participants |
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Group Differences in Infant BMI | participants post BMI < 85th | 9 Participants |
| Control | Group Differences in Infant BMI | participants post BMI > 85th | 2 Participants |
| Control | Group Differences in Infant BMI | participants post BMI < 85th | 11 Participants |
Group Differences in Infant Diet Diversity
Diet will be assessed via three random dietary recall interviews conducted with mothers by phone within 2 weeks of the baseline and post-treatment study visit dates. Trained interviewers, blinded to participant study condition, will employ the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) automated multiple-pass method (AMPM), a standardized interview approach. Differences between the control and intervention group on diet diversity (Minimum Diet Diversity) at post-treatment were calculated. Adequate MDD is defined as consuming a food from 4 or more of seven food groups in any amount during the prior 24 hours (possible score range 0- 7). Footnote: Originally proposed study outcomes included examination of pre-post changes in diet by treatment group (e.g., food groups) but this analysis was not possible because at baseline infants were 2 months of age and not yet consuming any solid foods.
Time frame: The measure of infant diet will be completed within 2 weeks of the baseline visit (when the child is 2 months of age) and again within 2 weeks of the post-treatment visit (when the child is 9 months of age).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Group Differences in Infant Diet Diversity | 4.24 food groups | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| Control | Group Differences in Infant Diet Diversity | 4.01 food groups | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
Group Differences in Infant Diet Quality
Diet will be assessed via three random dietary recall interviews conducted with mothers by phone. Trained interviewers, blinded to participant study condition, will employ the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) automated multiple-pass method (AMPM), a standardized interview approach. Differences between the control and intervention group on diet quality (Healthy Eating Index; HEI) at post-treatment were calculated. Scores range from 0- 100 with higher scores representing greater diet quality. Footnote: Originally proposed study outcomes included examination of pre-post changes in diet by treatment group (e.g., food groups) but this analysis was not possible because at baseline infants were 2 months of age and not yet consuming any solid foods.
Time frame: The measure of infant diet will be completed within 2 weeks of the baseline visit (when the child is 2 months of age) and again within 2 weeks of the post-treatment visit (when the child is 9 months of age).
Population: Data from dietary recalls at post-treatment (age nine months) will be used to calculate diet quality using the new Healthy Eating Index (HEI-Toddlers-2020) for children under two years of age.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Group Differences in Infant Diet Quality | 47.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Control | Group Differences in Infant Diet Quality | 46.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
Treatment Acceptability
Family perception of program acceptability was reported using an established questionnaire assessing components of the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA; Timm et al., 2022) with minor wording adaptations to better fit the HEMI program. The total measure included 3 subscale scores: Affective attitude and effectiveness, coherence and understanding, and perceived burden (Timm et al., 2022). A single overall acceptability question was also included. Scores were scaled to 100 with a score of 100 representing highest acceptability and 20 representing the lowest acceptability.
Time frame: The measure of feedback on the intervention will be completed at post-treatment (when the child is 9 months of age).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Treatment Acceptability | Overall Acceptability | 94.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.38 |
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Treatment Acceptability | Affective attitude and effectiveness | 89.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.72 |
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Treatment Acceptability | Coherence and understanding | 88.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.52 |
| Healthy Eating for My Infant Intervention | Treatment Acceptability | Perceived burden | 65.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.29 |