Skip to content

Goal Attainment Scaling in Upper Limb Spasticity Treatment

Goal Attainment Scaling in Upper Limb Spasticity Treatment With Botulinum Toxin and the Influence of Regular Exercise for Spastic Upper Limb on Quality of Life in Patients After Stroke

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04975646
Acronym
GASBTX
Enrollment
70
Registered
2021-07-23
Start date
2021-01-03
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2026-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhagic Stroke, Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

rehabilitation, spasticity, botulinum toxin A, goal setting, spasticity-related quality of life

Brief summary

Patients after stroke with upper limb spasticity treated with botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) will be included in this two-part study. In the first part, goal attainment scaling and comprehensive assessment of motor functioning will be performed before BTX-A application and after two weeks. In the second part, the patients will be randomised into a test group performing prescribed regular exercise for two weeks and a control group exercising at their own discretion during the same period, whereby the patients' health-related quality of life will be assessed at the beginning and end of the two-week period.

Detailed description

Goal setting will be performed by the patient together with the physician according to the SMART principle (specific, measureable, achievable, realistic, time bound). The goals will be classified according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Goal attainment will be assessed using the Goal Attainment Scale - Light. Comprehensive assessment of motor functioning will address range of motion, spasticity, pain, degree of motor disability and degree of dependence in daily activities. The prescribed exercises for the test group will be passive or active, depending on spasticity of the impaired upper limb. Both groups will keep an Exercise Diary during the second part of the study.

Interventions

Active or passive exercises for the spastic upper limb, including functional electrical stimulation (FES), performed regularly for two weeks.

Sponsors

University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

First part: observational study. Second part: parallel groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient's or caregiver's approval * ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke diagnosed using head CT/MRI * at least one upper limb muscle spasticity (MAS ≥ 3) * candidate for BTX-A treatment or already given BTX-A in the past * patient's or caregiver's capability for goal attainment protocol cooperation (Mini Mental Examination ≥ 24 points)

Exclusion criteria

* aphasic patients without caregiver's presence * other neurological or musculoskeletal diseases that could affect the treatment outcome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GAS-LightAt baseline, after 2 weeks (i.e., at the end of the 1st part of the study)Change in Goal Attainment Scale - Light
SQoL-6DStart of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 2 weeks), end of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 4 weeks)Change in Spasticity Related Quality of Life Tool score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ROMStart of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 2 weeks), end of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 4 weeks)Change in Range of motion (degrees)
MASStart of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 2 weeks), end of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 4 weeks)Change in Modified Ashworth Scale score
PSFSStart of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 2 weeks), end of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 4 weeks)Difference in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale
VASStart of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 2 weeks), end of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 4 weeks)Change in pain rating on the Visual Analog Scale
BSRStart of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 2 weeks), end of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 4 weeks)Change in Brunnstrom Stage of Recovery score
MRSStart of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 2 weeks), end of the 2nd part of the study (i.e., after 4 weeks)Change in Modified Rankin Scale score

Countries

Slovenia

Contacts

CONTACTMetka Moharić, MD, PhD
metka.moharic@ir-rs.si+386 1 4758441
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNataša Bizovičar, MD, PhD

University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 16, 2026