Skip to content

Retrograde Recanalization of Infrainguinal Arterial Occlusive Disease.

Retrograde Approach for Management of Infrainguinal Arterial Occlusive Disease After Failed Antegrade Approach in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients; Feasibility, Safety, and Procedure Related Outcomes.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04974905
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-07-23
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2022-08-01
Last updated
2021-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Limb Ischemia

Brief summary

The spectrum of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) ranges from exhibiting no symptoms to limb threatening gangrene. The number of patients living with it is rising steadily owing to increased life expectancy, obesity, diabetes, and tobacco consumption. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the terminal and the most serious stage of PAD in which blood flow to the lower extremity does not meet metabolic demands of the tissues at rest. The diagnosis is mainly clinical and patients are presented with rest pain, minimal tissue loss or frank gangrene. Revascularization strategies include endovascular procedures and surgical bypass.Endovascular therapy has evolved as an attractive, minimally invasive method of revascularization especially in the more frequently encountered patients with medical and anatomical contraindications to surgical revascularization. Antegrade approach is the standard approach in infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease,however, failure occurs in about 20% of infrainguinal attempts.Retrograde approach is used as a backup technique in failed cases.

Interventions

PROCEDUREretrograde access for re-canalization of infra-inguinal arterial occlusive disease

after failed antegrade approach for re-canalization of infra-inguinal arterial occlusive disease( failed reentry into the distal true lumen), the retrograde approach will be attempted

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

patients with; 1. CLI consistent with Rutherford categories (4-5). 2. Infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease with a patent distal part of at least one tibial vessel runoff to the foot.

Exclusion criteria

patients with the following conditions will be excluded: 1. Non-salvageable limbs. 2. Life threatening infections requiring major amputation. 3. Ulcers at the area of intended puncture.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
safety of retrograde approach as regard occurrence of procedure specific complicationswithin one year of follow upsafety of retrograde approach after failed antegrade approach for recanalization of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease, in the light of complications which are classified into major or minor according to the reporting standards of society of vascular surgery.this complications will be looked for and data will be collected
feasibility of retrograde approach as regard successful retrograde puncture and technical success after failed antegrade approach for recanalization of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.within one year of follow upit means that this approach can be used successfuly in clinical practice and this will be assessd by measuring successful retrograde puncture and technical success. successful retrograde puncture means successful performance of retrograde puncture at any of the retrograde distal puncture sites with intraluminal placement of the retrograde guidewire confirmed by contrast angiography without causing procedure specific complications namely local dissection, rupture, or an arteriovenous fistula at puncture site. technical success is defined as successful puncture followed by successful crossing of the occlusion and regain of inline flow to the foot with less than 30%residual stenosis after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical success of the procedurewithin one year of follow upimmediate clinical success is defined as regain of distal pulses, revascularization warmness and edema, and/or disappearance of rest pain.
One year limb salvage rate of the procedurewithin one year of follow uplimb salvage is defined as healing of existing wounds with no amputation proximal to metatarsus.

Contacts

Primary ContactMostafa A Foda, Msc
m_foda_revolution2020@yahoo.com01012514518
Backup ContactHussein K Hussein, Professor
01222142667

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026