Skip to content

Saliva-based COVID-19 DNA Aptamer Test

Saliva-based COVID-19 DNA Aptamer Test: Formative Usability and Internal Validation Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04974203
Enrollment
200
Registered
2021-07-23
Start date
2021-07-31
Completion date
2021-08-31
Last updated
2021-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Covid19

Keywords

Saliva-based test, DNA aptamer

Brief summary

This study aims to conduct formative usability and internal validation of the COVID-19 rapid diagnostic test tool based on DNA aptamers, involving 200 patients to assess aspects of experimental setup, testing center, testing kit configuration, designing algorithms or workflows for clinical trials, and also assess initial accuracy by validating with the patient's PCR test results.

Detailed description

RT-PCR has several limitations that need to be considered in its role as a COVID-19 diagnostic modality, especially in areas with limited health infrastructure. Potential diagnostic tests are needed that are capable of detecting results that are fast to read, can be carried out in service locations with limited infrastructure, and have high accuracy. The DNA Aptamers-based diagnostic test has the potential to meet these criteria, as it allows the detection of infection quickly and without invasive procedures, where the examination is only on a person's saliva. The development of diagnostic tools must be well planned including the usability and internal validation of the tools to be studied before they can be used in clinical trial settings or diagnostic accuracy tests by involving patients in health services. This study aims to conduct formative usability and internal validation of the DNA aptamer-based COVID-19 rapid diagnostic test, involving 200 patients and also laboratory personnel to assess aspects of experimental setup, testing center, testing kit configuration, designing algorithms or workflows for testing in clinical trials, and also assess early indications of instrument accuracy by validating with the patient's PCR test data.

Interventions

DEVICEAptameX

DNA aptamer-based test using patient's saliva

Sponsors

Udayana University
CollaboratorOTHER
Achiko AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors are blinded to the PCR test result

Intervention model description

Patients who undertake PCR test are asked to provide saliva sample

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-59 years old * Undertaking PCR swab test for screening, or * In-patients undertaking PCR swab test

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to produce saliva * Refusing to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient subjective elements1 monthAspects of the workflow liked/not liked by the patient during saliva collection
Hands-On-Time (HOT)1 monthTotal time (seconds) spent by the Operator(s) to process one test
Time-To-Result (TTR)1 monthInstrument readout, from loading the cuvette in the spectrophotometer, up to recording the test as Positive / Negative
Testing Centre First-Time-Hit percentage (FTH)1 monthThe FTH percentage measures proportion of test kits that will be correctly processed with no single mistake, from the opening of the test kit to recording the test result.
Technician Subjective elements1 monthAspects of the workflow liked/not liked by the technicians

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specificity1 monthThe ability of the test to correctly identify those without the disease (true negative rate)
Positive Predictive Value1 monthThe proportions of positive results that are true positive results
Negative Predictive Value1 monthThe proportions of negative results that are true negative results
Sensitivity1 monthThe ability of a test to correctly identify those with the disease (true positive rate)

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026