Skip to content

China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial 2 for Participants With Hypertension and MTHFR 677 TT Genotype

Comparative Efficacy of Amlodipine Folic Acid vs. Amlodipine on the Risk of First Ischemic Stroke Among Participants With Hypertension and MTHFR 677 TT Genotype: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Triple-dummy, Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04974151
Acronym
CSPPT2-TT
Enrollment
24000
Registered
2021-07-23
Start date
2024-08-22
Completion date
2029-06-30
Last updated
2025-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, MTHFR 677 TT Genotype

Keywords

Folic acid, Homocysteine, MTHFR 677 TT genotype, Randomized controlled trial, Ischemic stroke, 5-MTHF

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy, controlled trial in 24,000 Chinese men and women with hypertension and MTHFR 677 TT genotype. The study participants will be randomized to one of the three treatment groups: Group A: amlodipine tablet (5mg), taken orally, once daily, serving as active comparator. Group B: amlodipine folic acid 5.8mg tablet (5mg amlodipine and 0.8mg folic acid), taken orally, once daily. Group C: amlodipine folic acid 5.8mg tablet plus 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF, 0.4mg), taken orally, once daily. The primary endpoint is first ischemic stroke.

Detailed description

This study consists of 3 periods: Screening, Run-in, and Randomized treatment. Period I: Screening (V0) The purpose of Period I is to obtain informed consent and screen for eligible participants. After obtaining written informed consent, at the screening visit (V0), participants will complete a face-to-face interview and clinical evaluation and measurements. Their biological samples will be collected for laboratory analyses. Collectively, these information will help to determine eligibility for inclusion in the study. Period II: Run-in Period (VD) The purpose of Run-in is to assess participants' compliance for following the amlodipine treatment regimen as well as to observe participants' tolerance to amlodipine, so as to screen out those with poor compliance or intolerance to amlodipine treatment. The run-in phase lasted 2 to 4 weeks, during which oral administration of Amlodipine tablets (5 mg) was given once daily. Period III: Randomized Treatment (V1-V21) This is a 5-year period of randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy, controlled treatment. At each of the research centers, participants who remain eligible for participation in the study will be randomized into 3 treatment groups: A. Amlodipine-only (5mg/d) with an amlodipine folic acid placebo and 5-MTHF placebos. B. Amlodipine folic acid tablet (5.8mg/d) with amlodipine placebo and 5-MTHF placebo. C. Amlodipine folic acid tablets (5.8mg/d) and 5-MTHF (0.4mg/d) with an amlodipine placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio, using the randomization and trial supply management (RTSM) platform. During the treatment period, other antihypertensive drugs can be added to achieve blood pressure control (BP ≤140/90mmHg), including Valsartan (80mg/d), or/and Indapamide (1.5mg/d), or/and metoprolol tartrate tablets (25mg/d). Participants will be followed up every 3 months during the treatment period, and the treatment drugs will be distributed at each visit. A total of 24,000 participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (Group A n=8,000, Group B n=8,000, Group C n=8,000). Based on published data from CSPPT (Huo et al, JAMA, 2015), the 5-year cumulative incidence of first ischemic stroke in the amlodipine-only group is 3.5%. Assuming the 5-year cumulative incidence of first ischemic stroke in the amlodipine-only group is around 3.5%, this trial has 80% power to detect a 20% difference between group A and group B+C in the observed hazard ratio (HR) for incident ischemic stroke (HR≤0.80), at a two-sided significance level of α=0.05. If instead, the 5-year incidence of ischemic stroke in the amlodipine-only group is 2.5%, this trial has 80% power to detect a 23% difference between the treatment groups (A vs B+C) (HR≤0.77). There are two planned interim analyses, one at the end of the third year, and another at the end of the fourth year. The O'Brien-Fleming alpha-spending function will be used to define the significance level of each interim analysis to ensure that the final overall two-sided significance level of α=0.05 is met.

Interventions

The amlodipine used in this study is a listed product.

The amlodipine besylate and folic acid tablets have been approved for listing by the China Food and Drug Administration, approval number: Zhunzi H20180020.

The 5-MTHF used in this study is a listed product.

Amlodipine placebos are dummy pills of amlodipine with identical appearance.

DRUGAmlodipine folic acid placebo

Amlodipine folic acid placebos are dummy pills of amlodipine folic acid with identical appearance.

DRUG5-MTHF Placebos

5-MTHF placebos are the dummy pills of 5-MTHF with identical appearance.

Sponsors

Peking University First Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital Of Guizhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Lianyungang Oriental Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tengzhou Central People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen Prospective Medical Technology Co., LTD
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Weinan Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of HuNan University of Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Loudi Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Yancheng First People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
TAIHE country people's hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Yangjiang People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Deyang People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Bozhou people's hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Chizhou people's hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Lianyungang Second People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Affiliated Hospital Of Southwest Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen Ausa Pharmed Co.,Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, triple-dummy clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women, aged ≥45 and \<75 years. 2. Hypertension: Previously diagnosed with primary hypertension and has been taking antihypertensive medication within the past two weeks; OR has not been taking antihypertensive medications within the last two weeks, but meets the following criteria for hypertension: SBP≥140 mmHg and/or DBP≥90 mmHg (average of at least 2 measurements each time) at two separate (not on the same day) clinical visits. 3. MTHFR 677 TT genotype (based on the test results from the central laboratory during the screening period or a previous official test report from a laboratory with medical testing qualifications). 4. Voluntarily participates and has given signed informed consent. Randomized-treatment phase inclusion criteria: 1. Good compliance during the run-in period, and unlikely to discontinue treatment; 2. No stroke or cardiovascular events during the run-in period; 3. The participant voluntarily agrees to continue the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previously diagnosed secondary hypertension; 2. Previously diagnosed stroke; 3. Previously diagnosed myocardial infarction; 4. Previously diagnosed heart failure; 5. Previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation; 6. Cardio-cerebral-kidney revascularization and/or other large arterial stent; 7. Currently on dialysis, or diagnosed with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease, or eGFR \<30 mL/ min/1.73m²; 8. Known to have congenital (such as aortic stenosis) or acquired organic heart disease; 9. Known to have any of the following severe diseases or conditions: 1. Digestive system: i. Previously diagnosed with any form of viral hepatitis that is currently still in the active phase; ii. Abnormal liver function test before enrollment (any of ALT, AST, GGT, TBIL, DBIL test 3 times higher than normal, or ALB≤30g/L); iii. Subtotal gastrectomy and/or gastrojejunostomy; 2. Respiratory system: previously diagnosed with pulmonary heart disease; 3. Presence of malignant tumors or other severe diseases; 4. Presence of long-term gastrointestinal symptoms such as ; anorexia, decreased appetite, nausea, and abdominal bloating; 5. Previously diagnosed with vitamin B12 deficiency and/or its related diseases. 10. Participant, at the investigator's discretion, is assessed to be unsuitable for the study, for reasons including but not limited to the presence of abnormal laboratory results, or clinical conditions; 11. Prior history of significant intolerance due to adverse reactions resulting from usage of amlodipine or other CCBs, valsartan or other ARBs, indapamide or other similar diuretics, metoprolol tartaric acid or other beta-blockers, or any drugs or health products containing folate or folic acid; 12. Regular consumption of folic acid or vitamin B compounds, or other compounds containing folic acid in the past 3 months; 13. The presence of any of the following conditions that could negatively influence a participant's ability to consent or participate in the trial: 1. Dementia; 2. Severe mental disorders; 3. Inability to express informed consent; 4. Unlikely to complete the study follow-up as specified by the protocol, or plans to relocate outside of the study area in the near future; 5. History of poor compliance when taking antihypertensive medications or is expected to have poor compliance during the study; 14. Refusal to participate, or inability to modify current drug regimen; 15. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding; or subjects of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use effective contraception during the study period. 16. Within one month prior to the first visit, having participated in any clinical trial for a drug that has not yet been officially approved by the state or is not currently approved for sale; or currently participating in any clinical trial that could potentially impact the results of this study (medication use, drug efficacy, drug interaction, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First ischemic strokeBy the end of the fifth year of the studyThe primary aim of the trial is to determine whether amlodipine folic acid tablets (including Group B and Group C), compared to amlodipine alone (Group A), can further reduce the risk of first ischemic stroke among eligible participants with hypertension and the MTHFR 677 TT genotype.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First ischemic stroke (for refined treatment group comparisons)By the end of the fifth year of the studyWe will examine whether there exist significant differences in efficacy in reducing the risk of first ischemic stroke between the following pairs of treatment groups: Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
First stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic)By the end of the fifth year from baselineWe will examine whether there exist significant differences in efficacy in reducing the risk of first stroke between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
Composite cardiovascular endpoint (first non-fatal stroke, first non-fatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death)By the end of the fifth year from baselineWe will examine whether there exist significant differences in efficacy in reducing the risk of composite cardiovascular endpoint between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
Kidney outcomesBy the end of the fifth year from baseline1. The primary kidney outcome is composite kidney outcome, defined as: (1) a decrease in eGFR of 30% or more and to a level of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 if the baseline eGFR is 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more, or (2) a decrease in eGFR of 50% or more if the baseline eGFR is less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, or (3) end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (eGFR \<15 mL/min/1.73m2 or dialysis or kidney transplantation). 2. Secondary kidney outcomes: (1) eGFR decline ≥40% from baseline, or end-stage kidney disease; (2) annual rate of relative decline in eGFR; (3) Incidence of proteinuria, or progression of proteinuria. We will examine whether there exist significant differences in treatment efficacy on the above kidney endpoints between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
First hemorrhagic strokeBy the end of the fifth year from baselineWe will examine whether amlodipine folic acid tablets (including Groups B and C), compared to amlodipine alone (Group A), show significantly greater efficacy in preventing first hemorrhagic stroke.
First myocardial infarctionBy the end of the fifth year from baselineWe will examine whether amlodipine folic acid tablets (including Groups B and C), compared to amlodipine alone (Group A), show significantly greater efficacy in preventing first myocardial infarction.
First coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI])By the end of the fifth year from baselineWe will examine whether amlodipine folic acid tablets (including Groups B and C), compared to amlodipine alone (Group A), show significantly greater efficacy in preventing first coronary revascularization.
Cardiovascular deathBy the end of the fifth year from baselineWe will examine whether amlodipine folic acid tablets (including Groups B and C), compared to amlodipine alone (Group A), show significantly greater efficacy in preventing cardiovascular death.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma tHcy changePlasma total homocysteine changes at one year, three-year and at the end of follow-up(up to 5 years).We will examine whether there exist significant differences in treatment efficacy on the plasma total homocysteine changes between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
Malignant tumorsBy the end of the fifth year of the studyWe will examine whether there exist significant differences in efficacy in reducing the risk of malignant tumors between the Groups B + C and Group A.
All-cause mortalityBy the end of the fifth year of the studyWe will examine whether there exist significant differences in efficacy in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality between the Groups B + C and Group A.
Blood pressure levels1) Blood pressure levels at one year, three-year and at the end of follow-up(up to 5 years). 2) Average blood pressure levels across all visits in the first and third years of follow-up, as well as for the entire follow-up period (up to 5 years).We will examine whether there exist significant differences in treatment efficacy on the blood pressure levels between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
Blood pressure variability1) Average blood pressure variability across all visits in the first and third years of follow-up, and across all visits throughout the entire follow-up period (up to 5 years).We will examine whether there exist significant differences in treatment efficacy on the blood pressure variability between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
Blood pressure target achievement rates1) Blood pressure target achievementrates at 1-year, 3-year and at the end of follow-up(up to 5 years). 2) Average bloodpressure target achievement rates across all visits in the first and third years of follow-up, and for the entire follow-up period.]We will examine whether there exist significant differences in treatment efficacy on the blood pressure target achievement rates between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
Serum folate levelSerum folate levels at one year, three-year and at the end of follow-up(up to 5 years).We will examine whether there exist significant differences in treatment efficacy on the serum folate levels between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
Serum folate changeSerum folate changes at one year, three-year and at the end of follow-up(up to 5 years).We will examine whether there exist significant differences in treatment efficacy on the serum folate changes between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C
Plasma tHcy levelPlasma total homocysteine levels at one year, three-year and at the end of follow-up(up to 5 years).We will examine whether there exist significant differences in treatment efficacy on the plasma total homocysteine levels between the following pairs of treatment groups: Groups B + C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group A Group C vs. Group A Group B vs. Group C

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMinqing Tian, PhD
tianminqing@163.com86-18818680849

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026