Contact Tracing
Conditions
Keywords
Partner notification services, Crowdsourcing, MSM, HIV
Brief summary
Individuals will participate in a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) that implements and evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of crowdsourced partner services (PS) or conventional PS among Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV. The pilot RCT will include 120 newly identified MSM HIV cases who were born biologically male, aged 18 years old or older, newly identified as HIV positive, had oral or anal sex with a man, had at least one sexual partner in the previous 6 months and live in Guangzhou. Participants will undergo a series of computer-based interviews (baseline and 2 months after enrollment) and will be randomly assigned into two groups in 2:1 ratio (intervention: control) and receive crowdsourced PS and conventional PS, respectively.
Detailed description
This is a pilot RCT, and the primary outcomes of this study are: 1) to test the feasibility and acceptability of the crowdsourced intervention, and 2) to pilot the preliminary impact of crowdsourced PS intervention in promoting HIV testing among partners of the newly identified HIV cases. In addition, this pilot RCT aimed to collect preliminary data for the designing of a full RCT, which aimed to measure the efficacy of the crowdsourced PS intervention in promoting PS. Thus, the sample size of this study is not designed and will be not powered enough to test the difference between the two arms. However, with a sample size of 120 (80 for intervention arm and 40 for the control arm, respectively), this pilot study would be able to observe the differences between the two arms and collect preliminary data for adequate sample size calculation of a full RCT. With a sample size of 120 (ratio of 2:1), alpha=0.05, power=0.80, and the partner return rate in the conventional PS arm is 30% (around 31% in 2016 in Guangzhou), the minimal detectable effect size would be 26.7% for this pilot study. Data analyses: For the primary outcomes of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention: this will be analyzed through descriptive analysis to assess the feedback on the feasibility and acceptability of the crowdsourced PS intervention at baseline and the follow-up survey. For the primary outcome of the proportion of partners returning for HIV testing within 2 months of the index participant's enrolment in the study, log-binomial regression (generalized linear model with binomial distribution and log link) will be used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the proportion of notifiable partners visiting by arm. Risk differences and risk ratios will also be calculated in these models. As this study is a pilot RCT, adjustment for covariates is not necessary and will not be conducted in the primary analysis. In secondary analyses, pre-specified potential confounding variables will be adjusted that might bias the estimate if not accounted for (e.g. index age, index marital status). If a partner reports more than one index referred him, he will be counted as a returning partner for each identified index. Subgroup analyses will be performed by partner sex, partner type (e.g. main male partner vs. casual male partner) and sexual orientation. Time to presentation will also be assessed among all notifiable partners using Cox proportional hazards with a robust variance estimator. In the time-to-event analyses, censoring will occur at the end of 2-months. Note that for the primary outcome, the assumption is that any partner without an identifiable record at the community center or in the centralized electronic medical record (EMR) did not present for HIV testing. Therefore, this study assumes no missing outcome data. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted using alternative definitions of presentation for testing, including using the self-reported data from index cases and partners. For count variables expressed as the mean number of partners, the investigators will use either Poisson regression or negative binomial regression if overdispersion is identified.
Interventions
The intervention includes the provision of provider referral and dual referral services, crowdsourced materials such as postcards and an HTML aiming to promote PS, as well as free take-home HIV self-testing kits.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
120 newly identified MSM HIV cases will be randomly assigned into two groups in 2:1 ratio (intervention: control) and receive crowdsourced PS and conventional PS, respectively.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* born biologically male, * aged 18 years old or older, * newly identified as HIV positive, * had oral or anal sex with a man, * had at least one sexual partner in the previous 6 months * live in Guangzhou
Exclusion criteria
* Not meet inclusion criteria * Not given informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of MSM Index Cases That Respond to the Follow-up Survey at 3 Months After Enrollment | 3 months post enrollment | Intervention feasibility, measured by the percentage of MSM index cases that respond to the follow-up survey 3 months after enrollment |
| Acceptability Degree of the Intervention Using an Acceptability Questionnaire | 3 months post enrollment | Intervention acceptability, measured by the mean score of an acceptability questionnaire among index patients in the intervention group at 3-month follow-up. The questionnaire asks index patients about their responses to statements regarding the acceptability of the crowdsourced intervention materials, and is rated on a 1-5 scale with mean scores ranging between 1 and 5, where 1 means 'strongly disagree' and 5 means 'strongly agree'. Higher mean scores mean higher acceptability. |
| Percentage of Partners Who Perform HIV-testing Within 3 Months of the Index Patient's Enrollment | 3 months post enrollment | The preliminary impact of the intervention, measured by the percentage of partners who perform HIV-testing within 3 months of the index patient's enrollment. Partner HIV testing is self-reported by the index, and verified by the partners uploading testing results. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Number of Case-finding Per Index | 3 months post enrollment | The mean number of case-finding (i.e., partners tested positive) per index within 3 months post index enrollment |
| Percentage of Partners Who Were Notified Within 3 Months of the Index's Enrollment | 3 months post enrollment | The percentage of partners who were notified by their indexes within 3 months of the index's enrollment |
| Percentage of Presenting Partners Reporting Condom Use During the Last Anal Intercourse | 3 months post enrollment | The percentage of presenting partners who completed the partner survey and reported condom use during the last anal intercourse |
| Percentage of Casual Male Partners Getting HIV Testing | 3 months post enrollment | The percentage of partners getting HIV testing who are not spouses or regular male partners |
| Mean Number of Partners Tested Per Index | 3 months post enrollment | The mean number of sexual partners tested per index followed for the last 3 months. |
| Percentage of Partners Who Have Positive HIV Tests Among All Tested Partners | 3 months post enrollment | The percentage of partners tested as HIV positive among partners who performed HIV-testing in the last 3 months. |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Three HIV testing clinics were selected as recruitment sites; they were based at Guangzhou CDC, an MSM CBO in Guangzhou, and an MSM CBO in Zhuhai, respectively. The baseline recruitment lasted from August 1st 2021 to May 26th 2022.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group Participants in the intervention group will receive crowdsourced HIV partner services that integrated three parts: (a) educational materials for HIV PS promotion purposes, (b) secondary distribution of HIVST kits (HIVST-SD) to sexual partners, and (c) options of provider referral or contract referral using anonymous notification messages.
The educational materials included (a.1) postcards from previous crowdsourcing events to facilitate HIV PS, and (a.2) a digital platform embedded in the WeChat application that offered HIV PS skills by partner types, and potential risks or adverse consequences. The digital platform also included a section on peer sharing, where MLWH shared their experience of successfully disclosing their HIV status to their sexual partners in text or video forms. The QR code of the digital platform was printed on (a.3) a public transport card pre-charged with $3 for portable usage and easy access. | 81 |
| Conventional HIV PS Group Participants in the control group will receive traditional partner services intervention, including referral cards that encourage the index patient to notify their partners by themselves. | 40 |
| Total | 121 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 6 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Conventional HIV PS Group | Total | Crowdsourced HIV PS Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 31.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 | 30.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 | 29.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 40 Participants | 121 Participants | 81 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 40 Participants | 121 Participants | 81 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 40 Participants | 121 Participants | 81 Participants |
| Sexual orientation Bisexual | 3 Participants | 21 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Sexual orientation Gay | 35 Participants | 91 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Sexual orientation Other/Prefer not to answer | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sexual orientation Straight | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sexual orientation disclosure No | 9 Participants | 26 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Sexual orientation disclosure Yes | 31 Participants | 95 Participants | 64 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 81 | 0 / 40 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 81 | 0 / 40 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 81 | 0 / 40 |
Outcome results
Acceptability Degree of the Intervention Using an Acceptability Questionnaire
Intervention acceptability, measured by the mean score of an acceptability questionnaire among index patients in the intervention group at 3-month follow-up. The questionnaire asks index patients about their responses to statements regarding the acceptability of the crowdsourced intervention materials, and is rated on a 1-5 scale with mean scores ranging between 1 and 5, where 1 means 'strongly disagree' and 5 means 'strongly agree'. Higher mean scores mean higher acceptability.
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Population: Only indexes in the intervention arm who completed the 3-month follow-up survey would provide acceptability data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Acceptability Degree of the Intervention Using an Acceptability Questionnaire | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
Percentage of MSM Index Cases That Respond to the Follow-up Survey at 3 Months After Enrollment
Intervention feasibility, measured by the percentage of MSM index cases that respond to the follow-up survey 3 months after enrollment
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Percentage of MSM Index Cases That Respond to the Follow-up Survey at 3 Months After Enrollment | 92.6 percentage of participants |
| Conventional HIV PS Group | Percentage of MSM Index Cases That Respond to the Follow-up Survey at 3 Months After Enrollment | 82.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Partners Who Perform HIV-testing Within 3 Months of the Index Patient's Enrollment
The preliminary impact of the intervention, measured by the percentage of partners who perform HIV-testing within 3 months of the index patient's enrollment. Partner HIV testing is self-reported by the index, and verified by the partners uploading testing results.
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Population: 81 indexes in the intervention arm reported 171 sexual partners in total, and 40 indexes in the control arm reported 89 sexual partners in total.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Percentage of Partners Who Perform HIV-testing Within 3 Months of the Index Patient's Enrollment | 38.0 percentage of partners |
| Conventional HIV PS Group | Percentage of Partners Who Perform HIV-testing Within 3 Months of the Index Patient's Enrollment | 27.0 percentage of partners |
Mean Number of Case-finding Per Index
The mean number of case-finding (i.e., partners tested positive) per index within 3 months post index enrollment
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Population: Only index participants who finished the 3-month follow-up survey were included for analysis, including 75 out of 81 participants in the intervention group, and 33 out of 40 participants in the control group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Mean Number of Case-finding Per Index | 0.2 positive partners per index | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Conventional HIV PS Group | Mean Number of Case-finding Per Index | 0.1 positive partners per index | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Mean Number of Partners Tested Per Index
The mean number of sexual partners tested per index followed for the last 3 months.
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Population: Only index participants who finished the 3-month follow-up survey were included for analysis, including 75 out of 81 participants in the intervention group, and 33 out of 40 participants in the control group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Mean Number of Partners Tested Per Index | 0.9 tested partners per index | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Conventional HIV PS Group | Mean Number of Partners Tested Per Index | 0.7 tested partners per index | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Percentage of Casual Male Partners Getting HIV Testing
The percentage of partners getting HIV testing who are not spouses or regular male partners
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Population: Only casual male partners reported by index participants were included in this analysis, including 110 casual male partners from the intervention group and 58 partners from the control group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Percentage of Casual Male Partners Getting HIV Testing | 21.8 percentage of casual male partners |
| Conventional HIV PS Group | Percentage of Casual Male Partners Getting HIV Testing | 10.3 percentage of casual male partners |
Percentage of Partners Who Have Positive HIV Tests Among All Tested Partners
The percentage of partners tested as HIV positive among partners who performed HIV-testing in the last 3 months.
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Population: 65 sexual partners received HIV testing in the intervention group, and 24 sexual partners received HIV testing in the control group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Percentage of Partners Who Have Positive HIV Tests Among All Tested Partners | 23.1 percentage of partners |
| Conventional HIV PS Group | Percentage of Partners Who Have Positive HIV Tests Among All Tested Partners | 12.5 percentage of partners |
Percentage of Partners Who Were Notified Within 3 Months of the Index's Enrollment
The percentage of partners who were notified by their indexes within 3 months of the index's enrollment
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Population: 81 indexes in the intervention arm reported 171 sexual partners, and 40 indexes in the control arm reported 89 sexual partners.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Percentage of Partners Who Were Notified Within 3 Months of the Index's Enrollment | 34.5 percentage of partners |
| Conventional HIV PS Group | Percentage of Partners Who Were Notified Within 3 Months of the Index's Enrollment | 28.1 percentage of partners |
Percentage of Presenting Partners Reporting Condom Use During the Last Anal Intercourse
The percentage of presenting partners who completed the partner survey and reported condom use during the last anal intercourse
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Population: Only 24 partners in the intervention group and 6 partners in the control group completed the partner survey that asked about their condom use during the last anal intercourse.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced HIV PS Group | Percentage of Presenting Partners Reporting Condom Use During the Last Anal Intercourse | 62.5 percentage of presenting partners |
| Conventional HIV PS Group | Percentage of Presenting Partners Reporting Condom Use During the Last Anal Intercourse | 33.3 percentage of presenting partners |