Skip to content

Individualized Exercise Training Based on the Heart Rate Variability in Coronary Heart Disease Patient

Individualized Exercise Training Based on the Heart Rate Variability in Coronary Heart Disease Patient

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04971707
Acronym
HRV-Predict
Enrollment
48
Registered
2021-07-21
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2024-01-30
Last updated
2024-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Artery Diseases, Cardiac rehabilitation, exercise training, heart rate variability, cognitive performance

Brief summary

The objective of this project is to assess the effectiveness of a new modality of prescribing the intensity of physical exercise in cardiovascular rehabilitation programs according to physiological criteria (heart rate variability measured every morning) in comparison to a standard non-individualized program.

Detailed description

In coronary artery disease patients, cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) reduces cardiac mortality by 30% when compared to usual drug therapy without CR. Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) is the most powerful independent prognostic marker of longevity. An improvement in VO2peak is also associated with better cognitive performance in the elderly. The effectiveness of CR varies between patients. About 25% of coronary disease patients do not improve their VO2peak after taking part of a CR program. The risk of acute event for those non-responder patients, (i.e. not increasing their VO2peak), is high with a mortality rate three times higher compared to responder individuals. It seems that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) is playing an important role in exercise training-induced physiological responses. Based on this, it has been proposed in healthy subjects to prescribe each exercise session according to ANS parameters (via heart rate variability, HRV). It has been suggested that high-intensity exercise when HRV parameters are stable, results in better adaptations to training. Conversely, recovery sessions when HRV is impaired seem necessary. 44 participants with stable coronary artery diseases, and taking part in a CR program will be included in this study. All participants will have signed a written consent form before taking part in the study. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the 2 following study arms: 1/ standard exercise training ; 2/ Heart Rate Variability-guided exercise training.

Interventions

OTHERStandardized exercise training

HRV index will be measured every morning during 5 min. This group will benefit from the standard cardiovascular rehabilitation program combining both continuous moderate exercise sessions (MICT) and high intensity interval exercise sessions (HIIT). MICT sessions will be performed 2 times per week and HIIT sessions will be performed once a week.

OTHERHRV-guided exercise training

HRV index will be measured every morning during 5 min. This group will benefit from the individualized cardiovascular rehabilitation program. Daily exercise (MICT, HIIT, or active recovery) will be prescribed according to the HRV-index measured on the morning of the session.

Sponsors

Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Montreal Heart Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This clinical trial is a double-blinded study. Patients, and research personnel performing the outcome assessments and investigators will be blinded to group allocation. Only the kinesiologists will be aware of the group allocation.

Intervention model description

parallel assignment, 2 groups (1:1)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Coronary artery disease patient from the Montreal Heart Institute * Age\> 18 years old * Referred to the EPIC center in a cardiovascular rehabilitation program due to stable angina pectoris, acute coronary syndrome (with or without ST segment elevation) or after complete coronary revascularization (primary or elective) by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. * Able to perform a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise stress test in accordance with current cardiovascular rehabilitation recommendations. * Able to read, understand and sign the information and consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Any absolute and relative contraindication to the maximal exercise test and / or physical activity. * Recent cardiovascular events (cardiac decompensation or treatment with positive inotropic drugs or angioplasty less than 10 days, cardiac surgery less than 1 month, valve disease requiring surgical correction, active myopericarditis, severe ventricular arrhythmias not stabilized under treatment). * Revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting * Atrial fibrillation * Renal failure * Heart failure * Diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in cardiorespiratory fitnessBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsMaximum incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (VO2 max (ml.kg.min))
Responders and non-responders proportionBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsProportion in each group (%) Responders will be defined as an increased of 5% of VO2max.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
heart rate variabilityBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsGlobal heart rate variability : standard deviation of the normal sinus beats (SDNN, ms)
Baroreflex gainBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsBaroreflex sensibility (ms/mmHg)
Change in general cognitive functioningBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsMontreal Cognitive Assessment (0-30 score, with a higher score indicating a better cognitive functioning).
Parasympathetic activityBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsRoot Mean Square of the Successive Differences ( RMSSD) of heart rate variability (ms)
Change in processing speedBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsValidated remote version of neuropsychological tests and iPad tests (Composite Z-score).
Change in executive functionsBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsValidated remote version of neuropsychological tests and iPad tests (Composite Z-score).
Change in episodic memoryBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsValidated remote version of neuropsychological tests (Composite Z-score).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in anxietyBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsState-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire (Score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating higher anxiety).
Change in depressive symptomsBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsGeriatric Depression Scale questionnaire (Score ranges from 0-30, with a higher score indicating larger depressive symptomatology).
Change in sleep qualityBaseline and post-intervention at 3 monthsPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire (Score ranges from 0-21, with a higher score indicating worse sleep quality). symptomatology). symptomatology).

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026