Postoperative Pain
Conditions
Keywords
analgesia, tonsillectomy
Brief summary
Adenotonsillectomy surgery in paediatrics is commonly managed as an ambulatory surgery. This may be attributed to the use of the electro-dissection surgical technique that decreases the incidence of immediate postoperative haemorrhage. However, the use of the electro-cautery technique increases postoperative inflammation. This study aimed to compare the glossopharyngeal nerve block using the blind technique with the use of the ultrasound guidance Primary: FLACC score in the two groups 0,2,4,6 h after surgery at rest and with swallowing Secondary: need to analgesics, the difficulty of the technique, time consumption, recovery time, surgeon satisfaction, parents satisfaction, staff nurse satisfaction, anaesthetist self-confidence
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION Adenotonsillectomy surgery in paediatrics is commonly managed as an ambulatory surgery. This may be attributed to the use of the electro-dissection surgical technique that decreases the incidence of immediate postoperative haemorrhage. However, the use of the electro-cautery technique increases postoperative inflammation. Sensory fibres of the glossopharyngeal nerve supply the tonsillar and peri-tonsillar areas. Thus, a bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve block may alleviate post-tonsillectomy pain and improve postoperative analgesia. This is a Prospective randomized controlled clinical study, to compare two different technique used to block the glossopharyngeal nerve. AIM OF WORK To improve post tonsillectomy pain control in children Anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia Paediatrics 3-7 years Tonsillectomy NOT adenotonsillectomy Postoperative control of pain OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the glossopharyngeal nerve block using the blind technique with the use of the ultrasound guidance Primary: FLACC score in the two groups 0,2,4,6 h after surgery at rest and with swallowing Secondary: need to analgesics, the difficulty of the technique, time consumption, recovery time, surgeon satisfaction, parents satisfaction, staff nurse satisfaction, anaesthetist self-confidence METHODOLOGY 54 ASA I children allocated randomly into two groups: Group BL: Blind percutaneous peristyloid injection Group US: ultrasound-guided percutaneous peristyloid glossopharyngeal nerve block 54 children aged 3 to 7 years undergoing adenotonsillectomy without adenoidectomy were randomized to receive either local blind percutaneous peistyloid glossopharyngeal nerve block (n=27) or the use of ultrasound guidance for the same block (n=27). The pain was assessed by the FLACC scale or Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale, need for analgesics, and acceptance of diet during the postoperative period.
Interventions
PROCEDUREglossopharyngeal nerve block
glossopharyngeal nerve block either blindly or using the ultrasonic technique
Sponsors
Suez Canal University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
the participant will have the block while anaesthetized, the care provider will do the block either blindly or using ultrasonic, the outcome assessor will not know which one have which technique
Intervention model description
two groups, each will have peristyloid glossopharyngeal block, one with the help of ultrasound technology and the other blindly
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* children aged 3-7 years * scheduled for tonsillectomy
Exclusion criteria
* younger or elder children * associated adenoidectomy * history of allergy to local anaesthetics
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| change in face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) score | Immediately postoperatively considered as 0 hour, then at 2 hours, again at 4 hours, and lastly at 6 hours after surgery all measures will be both at rest and with swallowing | FLACC is a behavioural pain assessment scale used for nonverbal or preverbal patients who cannot self-report their pain level. Pain is assessed through observation of 5 categories including the face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability. The scale ranges from 0 to 10 where 0 records for no pain and 10 records for the worst pain |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| difficulty of the technique | immediately after the intervention | prescribed by the operator either easy or difficult |
| time consumption | immediately after the intervention | from the start of preparation of the procedure, till the end of the block time in minutes |
| recovery time | immediately before shifting the patient to recovery room | from the end of the surgery, till shifting the patient from operation table to recovery bed time in minutes |
| need for postoperative analgesia | immediately postoperatively considered as 0 hour, then at 2 hours, again at 4 hours, and lastly at 6 hours after surgery | need to analgesics in doses and frequencies both at rest and with swallowing. |
| anesthetists self-confidence | immediately after the intervention | described as yes or no |
| parents satisfaction | immediately before discharging the patient to home | described by the parents on a scale ranging from very satisfactory to unsatisfactory |
| staff nurse satisfaction | immediately before shifting the patient from the recovery room to the day care unite by recovery nurse, and immediately after discharging the patient to home by daycare unite nurse | described by the recovery nurse and daycare unite nurse on a scale ranging from very satisfactory to unsatisfactory |
| surgeon satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) | immediately after discharging the patient to home | described by the surgeon him self on a scale ranging from very satisfactory to unsatisfactory |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed