Skip to content

An Observational Study of GP Verbal Reminders Upon Cervical Screening

Three-year Prospective Cohort Study of the Effectiveness of Physician Reminders on Cervical Screening Uptake Amongst Non Responders in a UK Primary Care Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04970394
Acronym
VRCS
Enrollment
724
Registered
2021-07-21
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2021-03-03
Last updated
2021-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HPV-Related Cervical Carcinoma, Physician-Patient Relations

Keywords

Cervical Screening, Primary health care, Physician intervention

Brief summary

Cervical cancer screening is offered to all women in the United Kingdom (UK) between the ages of 24.5 and 64 years of age. The majority of screening is performed in primary care and the rate remains stubbornly below 80%, despite an automated national invitation system. This study is designed to assess the effectiveness of a physician invitation during a telephone or face-to-face primary care appointment upon non responders of automated invitations, to increase the uptake of cervical screening.

Detailed description

It is estimated that between 800 and 2,000 deaths a year are now prevented due to the effectiveness of the UK's national cervical screening programme and mortality rates have dropped by over 75% since the 1970s. These statistics corroborate the importance of the screening programme in reducing mortality from cervical cancer. Cervical screening rates in the UK remains stubbornly below 80% and interventions are needed to attract the 20% who are missing out on screening. This prospective observational study is designed to measure the impact of a physician intervention in a usual healthcare environment, amongst a heterogeneous patient population to yield replicable real-world results. The intervention arm will receive a physician intervention to inform them of their overdue screening status, remind them of the importance of cervical screening and guide them to book a screening appointment. The screening rate in the intervention arm will be compared to a control made up of patients seen by other clinicians and receiving unstructured reminders. The results will assist physicians in deciding whether a structured intervention is anymore effective than the unstructured advice currently given at improving screening rates in the non responder population.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCervical Screening Reminder

Verbal reminder and if seen face-to-face, a written appointment booking slip.

Sponsors

Dr. Faizan Awan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Registered patient with a cervix * Non responder to cervical screening invitation

Exclusion criteria

* Incorrectly reminded i. Coding errors ii. Human error * Temporary patients i. Did not remain registered for minimum of 6 months following intervention * Screening refusal * Inappropriate to include i. Terminal illness ii. Prolonged hospitalisation iii. Death due to non-cervical cancer attributable cause

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Uptake of Cervical ScreeningUp to 1 year post interventionThe number of patients who undergo cervical screening

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to book screeningUp to 1 year post interventionLength of time taken to undergo screening following intervention

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026