Skip to content

Efficacy of WB-EMS in Frail Older People

The Efficacy of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in Frail Older People: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04967534
Enrollment
54
Registered
2021-07-19
Start date
2021-07-21
Completion date
2022-03-15
Last updated
2022-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty Syndrome

Brief summary

Exercise in general and resistance training (RT) in particular have demonstrated positive effects on frailty outcomes, including physical functioning. However, frail older people with functional impairments are among the least physically active and have problems reaching high-intensity levels. Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) allows the simultaneous innervation of all large muscle groups by external electrical stimulation, inducing a high-intensity RT at a low subjective effort level. The efficacy of WB-EMS in frail older people has yet to be determined. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of WB-EMS in frail older people.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWB-EMS

Simultaneous, individually adjustable stimulation of 12 muscle groups using an interval approach with a duty cycle of 6s impulse/4s rest, bipolar electric current (impulse -frequency 85Hz, -width 350μs, rectangular pattern) will be applied. After a 4-week conditioning period, 1.5x 20 min/week WB-EMS will be conducted for 12 weeks (total training duration 8 weeks). Easy to perform functional exercises focusing on balance, transfer ability, stepping, and lower extremity strength will be done during WB-EMS. Exercise intensity will be individually prescribed and adjusted by the rate of perceived exertion (RPE-Borg CR10 scale 4 (moderate) to 7 (hard)). WB-EMS will be fully supervised one-on-one.

BEHAVIORALsocial contact control group

Psycho-social intervention with participants randomized to the control group receiving (if wanted) the same social contact time (20-30 minutes/week) as the WB-EMS group. Depending on personal preferences and Covid-19 restrictions this will be done by phone or in-person one-on-one. Health-related topics and/or general chatting will be offered.

Sponsors

University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

parallel-group (1:1) randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aged 65 years and older * frail according to Tilburg Frailty Indicator * residing in assisted living facility or nursing home * able to walk 4m w/o walking aid but without personal assistance * no prior WB-EMS exposure

Exclusion criteria

* severe visual or hearing impairments * major cognitive impairment (MMSE \<10) * medications with muscle-anabolic effects * medical conditions affecting trainability of muscles (e.g. Myasthenia gravis, Cushing syndrome, Morbus McArdle) * surgery within past two months * history of rhabdomyolysis * medical conditions affecting sensation of electrical stimuli (e.g. severe polyneuropathy) * severe renal insufficiency (eGFR\<30 ml/min/1.73m²) * electronic implants * acute or untreated abdominal wall or inguinal hernia * Ventricular arrhythmias requiring therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Lower Extremity Functioning8 weeks, 16 weeks, 32 weeksThe Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) comprises of three dimensions, balance (static - standing in 3 positions of increasing difficulty by reducing base of support for max. 10s), gait (usual pace - two walks of 4m lengths), functional strength (chair rise - five times sit-to-stand transfers as fast as possible). A sum score is calculated (0-12 points) with higher scores indicating better functional status and each dimension being equally weighed (0-4 points).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in leg strength8 weeks, 16 weeks, 32 weeksMaximal isometric knee extension strength will be assessed on the dominant leg with the participant seated. Three trials will be conducted.
Change in maximal hand grip strength8 weeks, 16 weeks, 32 weeksGrip strength will be assessed on the dominant hand using a digital dynamometer with the participant seated. Three trials will be conducted.
Change in gait speed16 weeks, 32 weeksGait speed will be assessed over 6 meters under 3 conditions, 1) walking at usual pace, 2) walking at usual pace while counting backwards by 3, 3) walking at fast pace
Change in Choice Stepping Reaction Time (CSRT) test16 weeks, 32 weeksCSRT time will be measured as the total time to complete 12 steps onto four targets printed on a portable rubber mat following 8 practice trials.
Change in Body Sway8 weeks, 16 weeks, 32 weeksAn instrumented test of postural sway (ISway) using a body-worn accelerometer will be used.
Change in Balance performance16 weeks, 32 weeksThe Berg Balance Scale (BBS) will be used to assess 14 balance tasks of static and dynamic stability. Each task is scored on a five-point scale according to quality or time ranging from 0 (lowest level of function) to 4 (highest level). The maximum score is 56.
Change in Functional Balance16 weeks, 32 weeksThe Alternate Step Test (AST) measures the time required to place the feet eight times in alternate order on a sturdy step (18 cm high) as fast as possible
Change in Frailty Status16 weeks, 32 weeksFrailty will be assessed by the Fried Phenotype and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI). The Fried phenotype comprises of muscle weakness, fatigue, slowness, low physical activity levels, unintentional weight loss, each scored as 0 (criterion not fulfilled) or 1 (criterion fulfilled). A total sum score of 0 indicates a person is robust, a score of 1 or 2 indicates pre-frailty and a score of 3-5 indicates frailty. The TFI is a self-reported frailty scale consisting of 3 domains, physical (8 items), psychological (4 items) and social (3 items). A total sum score greater or equal to 5 indicates frailty.
Change in lean mass16 weeks, 32 weeksLean mass will be assessed using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA).
Change in fat mass16 weeks, 32 weeksFat mass will be assessed using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA).
Change in Physical Activity16 weeksPhysical activities will be assessed using a 7-day accelerometry measurement. The device (ActivPAL 3 micro) will be attached to participants' thigh and worn over the complete 7-day/24-hour period.
Change in concentration of Triglycerides16 weeksConcentration of Triglycerides measured in mg/dl before first and last trainings
Change in concentration of total cholesterol16 weeksConcentration of Cholesterin measured in mg/dl before first and last trainings
Change in Mobility measured by the Timed up & go test (TUG)8 weeks, 16 weeks, 32 weeksThe TUG requires the participants to stand up from a chair, walk at usual pace to line at 3m, turn, walk back and sit down again. The time in seconds is recorded.
Change in concentration of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)16 weeksConcentration of LDL measured in mg/dl before first and last trainings
Change in concentration of glucose16 weeksConcentration of Glucose measured in mg/dl before first and last trainings
Change in concentration of Creatinkinase (CK)8 weeks, 16 weeksConcentration of CK measured in U/l before the first and after the last training
Change in concentration of Creatinine8 weeks, 16 weeksConcentration of Creatinine measured in mg/dl before the first and after the last training
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)8 weeks, 16 weekseGFR (creatinine clearance) measured in mL/min/1.73m² before the first and after the last training
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)8 weeks, 16 weeksPain and function due to orthopedic problems will be assessed with the WOMAC questionnaire, comprising of 24 items each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.
Change in continence status16 weeks, 32 weeksContinence status (frequency, severity, perceived burden, timing) will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ, 5 items) and the short form of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6, 6 items).
Change in depressive symptoms16 weeks, 32 weeksDepressive symptoms will be assessed using the Iowa version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), consisting of 11 items, each scored on a 3-point rating scale. The total sum score is calculated.
Change in concerns about falling16 weeks, 32 weeksThe Falls-efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) questionnaire will be used to assess the concerns about falling during 16 activities of daily living. Each item is scored on a 4-point rating scale and the total sum score is calculated.
Change in Quality of Life (QoL)16 weeksQoL will be assessed with 26-item WHOQOL-BREF covering physical health, psychological health, social relationships and environmental aspects. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale.
Change in sarcopenia specific QoL16 weeks, 32 weeksSarcopenia specific QoL will be assessed with the SarQoL, comprising of 55 items in 22 questions rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Seven domains are specified: Physical and mental health, Locomotion, Body composition, Functionality, Activities of daily living, Leisure activities and Fear.
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL)8 weeks, 16 weeks, 32 weeksHrQoL will be assessed using the 4-item HowRu scale comprising of 4 variables: pain or discomfort, feeling low or worried, limitation in activities and dependency on others. Each item is scored on a 4-point visual analogue scale.
Change in concentration of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)16 weeksConcentration of HDL measured in mg/dl before first and last trainings

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026