Gynecomastia
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to compare liposuction and periareolar surgical excision in mild and moderate cases of gynecomastia as regard cosmosis, complications, patient satisfaction, operation time, and hospital stay. This study will be carried out on patients with gynecomastia presented to the Plastic Surgery Department, Sohag University, in the period between January 2021 to January 2022 as a retrospective and prospective study. Patients will be divided into 2 groups: group A treated with suction-assisted liposuction. group B treated with peri-areolar surgical excision. Each group contains 20 patients.
Interventions
PROCEDUREliposuction
suction-assisted liposuction
PROCEDUREsurgical excision
periareolar surgical excision
Sponsors
Sohag University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
\- The age of patients ranges from 18-60yrs. Mild and moderate cases of gynecomastia.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with endocrine causes. Patients with genetic causes. Severe cases of gynecomastia. Patients who refused surgical intervention. Patients who are not fit for surgery. Patients with chronic illness.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference between group A and B in aesthetic satisfaction | difference between group A and B in aesthetic results according to visual analogue scale at 3 month post-operative | A 100 -point visual analogue scale (VAS) for the assessment of aesthetic satisfaction with 0 as the worst cosmosis and 100 as the best aesthetic result With filled standardized charts. |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed