Skip to content

A Trial of Pirtobrutinib (LOXO-305) Plus Venetoclax and Rituximab (PVR) Versus Venetoclax and Rituximab (VR) in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL)

A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized Study of Fixed Duration Pirtobrutinib (LOXO-305) Plus Venetoclax and Rituximab Versus Venetoclax and Rituximab in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (BRUIN CLL-322)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04965493
Acronym
BRUIN CLL-322
Enrollment
600
Registered
2021-07-16
Start date
2021-09-20
Completion date
2027-10-01
Last updated
2026-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Keywords

BTKi, Hematologic Disease, Lymphoma, non-Hodgkin's, Lymphoma, B-cell

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of fixed duration pirtobruitinib (LOXO-305) with VR (Arm A) compared to VR alone (Arm B) in patients with CLL/SLL who have been previously treated with at least one prior line of therapy. Participation could last up to five years.

Interventions

DRUGPirtobrutinib

Oral

DRUGVenetoclax

Oral

DRUGRituximab

Intravenous (IV)

Sponsors

Loxo Oncology, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 into Arm A and Arm B.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL requiring therapy per iwCLL 2018 criteria * Previous treatment with at least one line of therapy that may include a covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor * Platelets greater than or equal to (≥)50 x 10⁹/liter (L), hemoglobin ≥8 grams/deciliter (g/dL) and absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0 x 10⁹/L * Adequate organ function * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0-2 * Estimated creatinine clearance ≥30 milliliters per minute (mL/min)

Exclusion criteria

* Known or suspected Richter's transformation at any time preceding enrollment * Prior therapy with a non-covalent (reversible) BTK inhibitor * Patients requiring therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin or another Vitamin K antagonist * Current treatment with strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors or inducers * Prior therapy with venetoclax * Central nervous system (CNS) involvement * Active uncontrolled systemic bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic infection * Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, regardless of cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count * Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T within 60 days * Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C * Known active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection * Uncontrolled immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) or autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) * Significant cardiovascular disease * Vaccination with a live vaccine within 28 days prior to randomization * Patients with the following hypersensitivity: * Known hypersensitivity to any component or excipient of pirtobrutinib and venetoclax * Prior significant hypersensitivity to rituximab * Known allergy to allopurinol and inability to take uric acid lowering agent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) of pirtobrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab (Arm A) compared to venetoclax and rituximab (Arm B)Up to approximately 5 yearsAssessed by blinded independent review committee (IRC) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) 2018

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the efficacy of Arm A compared to Arm B: Progression-free survival (PFS)Up to approximately 5 yearsAssessments of efficacy include PFS, assessed by investigator
To evaluate the efficacy of Arm A compared to Arm B: Overall survival (OS)Up to approximately 5 yearsAssessments of efficacy include OS
To evaluate the efficacy of Arm A compared to Arm B: Time to next treatment (TTNT)Up to approximately 5 yearsAssessments of efficacy include TTNT
To evaluate the efficacy of Arm A compared to Arm B: Event-free survival (EFS)Up to approximately 5 yearsAssessments of efficacy include EFS
To evaluate the efficacy of Arm A compared to Arm B: Overall response rate (ORR)Up to approximately 5 yearsAssessments of efficacy include ORR
To evaluate the efficacy of Arm A compared to Arm B in patient-reported disease-related symptomsUp to approximately 5 yearsBased on time to worsening of CLL/SLL-related symptoms
To evaluate the efficacy of Arm A compared to Arm B in patient-reported physical functioningUp to approximately 5 yearsBased on time to worsening of physical functioning

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Poland, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORCall 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)

Eli Lilly and Company

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 11, 2026