Skip to content

The Effects of Methylphenidate and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Inhibitory Control in Children With ADHD

The Effects of Methylphenidate (MPH) and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (tDCS) on Inhibitory Control Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04964427
Enrollment
26
Registered
2021-07-16
Start date
2021-02-08
Completion date
2022-11-02
Last updated
2023-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Keywords

methylphenidate, executive functions, working memory, tDCS, inhibitory control

Brief summary

The aim of this study is comparing the effects of non-pharmacological intervention (transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS) with those of drug (methylphenidate, MPH) administration in children and adolescents with ADHD. The investigators hypothesized that tDCS would improve inhibitory control and visuo-spatial working memory as well as MPH.

Detailed description

A sham controlled within-subjects study design will be conducted. Clinical eligibility screening will be completed at baseline. All participants will undergo an extensive neuropsychiatric evaluation in which developmental neuropsychiatrists and psychologists will evaluate the cognitive and the adaptive level, the severity of ADHD symptoms, and the presence of comorbid psychiatric disorders. After completing baseline assessment (T0), participants will be exposure to 3 conditions with an intersession-interval of 24h (T1, T2, T3): A) a single administration of 1 milliampere (mA) anodal tDCS session over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); B) a single administration of 1 mA sham tDCS session over the DLPFC; C) a single administration of immediate release MPH (Ritalin®), in accordance with the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for ADHD (NICE, 2000). The order of the conditions will be counterbalanced across participants. After recruitment, the participants will be assigned to one of the 6 possible combinations of conditions (ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CBA, or CAB). The assignment will be according to a randomization order generated by a computer. The randomization information will be maintained by an independent researcher until data collection is completed. Participants will be tested on inhibitory control, by the Stop Signal Task (SST) and on working memory, by the N-Back Task, at baseline (T0), during tDCS administration (after 10 minutes of anodal and sham conditions) and after 1 hour of MPH administration. To verify that carry-over effects will not occur, the SST and the N-Back Task will be performed before each session (T1, T2, T3) and results will be compared with those obtained at baseline (T0). If the participant will not return to baseline level, another evaluation will be administered at least after two hours and, again, until participant's performance will return to baseline. Participants and parents will be blinded to tDCS conditions allocation. The tDCS will be carried out with a BrainStim stimulator.

Interventions

DRUGMethylphenidate

A single dose of 5-10 mg of immediate release MPH (Ritalin®) will be administered in line with NICE and AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco) guidelines for ADHD treatment.

DEVICEanodal tDCS

Anodal electrode will be positioned over the left dlPFC, according to the 10-20 EEG on the sites corresponding F3, whereas the reference electrode will be placed above the contralateral supraorbital area, corresponding to Fp2. In the active tDCS condition, the current will increase slowly during the first 30 seconds to 1 mA (ramp-up) and, at the end of the stimulation, the current will decrease slowly to 0 mA during the last 30 seconds (ramp-down). Between the ramp-up and ramp-down constant current will be delivered for 20 minutes, with a density of 0.04 mA/cm2.

DEVICEsham tDCS

In the sham tDCS condition, the stimulation will be delivered by using the same active tDCS montage, respectively left-anodal dlPFC and right-reference electrode over Fp2. Stimulation intensity will be set at 1 mA, but the current will be applied for 30 seconds and will be ramped down without the participants' awareness.

Sponsors

Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Study participants will receive the three conditions in random order: * a single dose of immediate release MPH (Ritalin®) administered according to the AIFA and NICE guidelines for ADHD; * a single 1 mA anodal tDCS session over the DLPFC for 20 min * a single session of sham tDCS over the DLPFC for 30s at the beginning and end of the tDCS session. The order of administration of the conditions will be counterbalanced between the participants and the conditions will be spaced apart from an interval of 24 hours.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: * Patients must receive a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) oriented diagnosis of ADHD and need drug treatment for the severity of symptoms; * Intelligent Quotient (IQ) \> 85;

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of Autism Spectrum Disorders; * Presence of Mood Disorders; * Previous/current diagnosis of neurological conditions (i.e. epilepsy, neurodegenerative diseases); * Presence of Genetic Syndromes; * Presence of basal medical conditions (i.e. heart, kidney or liver diseases) which may exclude the possibility to administer MPH.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
evaluate the change in response inhibition measuresimmediately after the interventionsCompare Stop Signal Reaction Times in patients with ADHD following the administration of a single anodal tDCS session, a single sham tDCS session and a single dose of MPH

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
evaluate the change in other response inhibition measuresimmediately after the interventionsReaction Times and Variability of Reaction Times of SST in patients with ADHD following the administration of a single anodal tDCS session, a single sham tDCS session and a single dose of MPH
evaluate the change in visuo-spatial working memory measureimmediately after the interventionsCompare N-Back Correct Scores of visuo-spatial working memory task in patients with ADHD following the administration of a single anodal tDCS session, a single sham tDCS session and a single dose of MPH

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026