Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal KSI-301 Compared With Intravitreal Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD)

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-masked, Active Comparator-controlled, Multi-center, Two-arm, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal KSI-301 Compared With Intravitreal Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04964089
Acronym
DAYLIGHT
Enrollment
557
Registered
2021-07-15
Start date
2021-06-23
Completion date
2023-04-06
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

AMD, Wet AMD, neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration, KSI-301, Aflibercept, Vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF, Anti-VEGF, Antibody biopolymer conjugate, Macular Degeneration, wAMD, Retinal Degeneration, Retinal Diseases, Eye Diseases, Vision Disorders, Vision, Low, Kodiak

Brief summary

This Phase 3 study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of KSI-301 compared to aflibercept, in participants with neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (wAMD)

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, prospective, randomized, double-masked, two-arm, multi-center non-inferiority study evaluating the efficacy and safety of repeated intravitreal dosing of KSI-301 5 mg in participants with visual impairment due to treatment-naïve neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) The primary endpoint will be assessed as an average of Weeks 40, 44, and 48; additional secondary endpoints for efficacy will be assessed by visit over time

Interventions

Intravitreal Injection

DRUGAflibercept

Intravitreal Injection

OTHERSham Procedure

The sham is a procedure that mimics an intravitreal injection. It involves pressing the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) against the anesthetized eye. It will be administered to participants in both treatments arms at applicable visits to maintain masking.

Sponsors

Kodiak Sciences Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

For masking purposes, sham injections will be administered at every monthly visit if an active treatment is not administered. To preserve masking, two investigators are required for this study. The masked Investigator will be responsible for the examinations and safety assessments. The unmasked Investigator will perform the injections and post-treatment assessments.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized 1:1 into one of two treatment arms: KSI-301 or aflibercept.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent prior to participation in the study. * Treatment-naïve choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD. * BCVA ETDRS score between 83 and 25 letters, inclusive, in the Study Eye. * Decrease in vision in the Study Eye determined by the Investigator to be primarily the result of wAMD. * Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

* BCVA of hand motion or worse in the non-Study Eye or non-physical presence of a non-Study Eye (i.e., monocular). * Active or suspected ocular or periocular infection or inflammation. * CNV secondary to other causes in the Study Eye. * Any history or evidence of a concurrent ocular condition present in the Study Eye, that in the opinion of the Investigator could require either medical or surgical intervention or affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the study. * Uncontrolled glaucoma in the Study Eye. * Significant media opacities, including cataract, in the Study Eye that might interfere with visual acuity, assessment of safety, OCT or fundus photography. * Cataract in the Study Eye that in the judgment of the Investigator is expected to require surgical extraction within 12 months of screening. * Women who are pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant during the study. * Recent history (within the 6 months prior to screening) of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute congestive heart failure or any acute coronary event. * History of a medical condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude scheduled study visits, completion of the study, or a safe administration of investigational product. * Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as a systolic value ≥180 mmHg or diastolic value ≥100 mmHg while at rest. * Other protocol-specified

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Day 1 to the Average of Non-missing BCVA Values of Weeks 40, 44 and 48.Day 1 to Week 48Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeDay 1 to Week 48Categorical improvements in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of clinically relevant BCVA measurements corresponding to 1, 2 and 3 lines of the ETDRS vision testing chart
Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeDay 1 to Week 48Categorical worsening in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of clinically relevant BCVA measurements corresponding to 1, 2 and 3 lines of the ETDRS vision testing chart
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeDay 1 to Week 48Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Day 1 to Week 48Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeDay 1 to Week 48Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) as assessed by a central reading center.
Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Day 1 to Week 48Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited based on physician referral at 94 medical centers between June 2021 and April 2022. The first participant was enrolled on 23 June 2021 and the last on 07 April 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Of 815 participants screened, 557 were randomized to treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)
Intravitreal injection of KSI-301 (5 mg) at Day 1 once every 4 weeks via intravitreal injection through Week 44. KSI-301: Intravitreal Injection
276
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)
Intravitreal injection of aflibercept (2 mg) once every 4 weeks for 3 monthly doses followed by intravitreal injection of aflibercept (2 mg) once every 8 weeks from Week 16 to Week 44. Sham injections will be administered at each monthly visit where an active treatment is not administered. Aflibercept: Intravitreal Injection Sham Procedure: The sham is a procedure that mimics an intravitreal injection. It involves pressing the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) against the anesthetized eye. It will be administered to participants in both treatments arms at applicable visits to maintain masking.
281
Total557

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event86
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyNon-compliance with study schedule10
Overall StudyParticipant decided to discontinue01
Overall StudyParticipant did not want to continue study treatment10
Overall StudyParticipant moved to different state10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyProgressive disease40
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject65

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAflibercept (Treatment Group B)TotalKSI-301 (Treatment Group A)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
263 Participants520 Participants257 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants37 Participants19 Participants
Age, Continuous77.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.84
77.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.02
76.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21
BCVA in the Study Eye64.0 Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.09
63.8 Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.07
63.7 Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.06
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants30 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
267 Participants527 Participants260 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Geographic Region
North America
228 Participants453 Participants225 Participants
Geographic Region
Rest of World
53 Participants104 Participants51 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
276 Participants545 Participants269 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
180 Participants339 Participants159 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
101 Participants218 Participants117 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 2763 / 281
other
Total, other adverse events
110 / 27680 / 281
serious
Total, serious adverse events
39 / 27639 / 281

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Day 1 to the Average of Non-missing BCVA Values of Weeks 40, 44 and 48.

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: Full analysis set defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one treatment injection. Subjects will be analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Day 1 to the Average of Non-missing BCVA Values of Weeks 40, 44 and 48.2.5 ETDRS LettersStandard Error 0.78
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Day 1 to the Average of Non-missing BCVA Values of Weeks 40, 44 and 48.4.6 ETDRS LettersStandard Error 0.76
p-value: 0.008395.03% CI: [-3.88, -0.29]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over Time

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: Full analysis set defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one treatment injection. Subjects will be analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 83.7 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 8.52
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 284.5 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.75
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 163.6 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.09
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 323.9 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 10.32
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 43.4 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 7.05
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 363.7 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 10.58
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 203.9 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.6
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 404.0 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 11.05
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 123.8 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 8.83
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 444.7 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.99
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 244.5 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.29
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 483.7 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 11.12
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 22.8 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 6.48
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 485.4 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 11.36
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 22.9 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 7.12
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 44.2 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 7.29
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 85.1 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 7.86
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 125.4 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 7.9
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 164.9 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 8.54
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 205.7 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 8.97
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 246.0 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.45
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 286.1 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.49
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 326.1 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.86
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 366.1 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 9.77
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 405.6 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 10.75
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit Over TimeWeek 445.9 ETDRS LettersStandard Deviation 10.71
Secondary

Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over Time

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) as assessed by a central reading center.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: Full analysis set defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one treatment injection. Subjects will be analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 12-97.1 MicronsStandard Deviation 118.62
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 28-114.6 MicronsStandard Deviation 111.47
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 2-72.1 MicronsStandard Deviation 83.74
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 32-111.9 MicronsStandard Deviation 122.05
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 16-107.2 MicronsStandard Deviation 110.02
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 36-113.6 MicronsStandard Deviation 129.84
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 40-113.6 MicronsStandard Deviation 115.34
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 8-89.1 MicronsStandard Deviation 121.13
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 44-115.8 MicronsStandard Deviation 115.81
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 20-111 MicronsStandard Deviation 112.97
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 48-117 MicronsStandard Deviation 114
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 4-74.9 MicronsStandard Deviation 98.33
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 40-48 Average-114.6 MicronsStandard Deviation 113.92
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 24-109.9 MicronsStandard Deviation 112.82
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 40-48 Average-113.4 MicronsStandard Deviation 112.07
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 2-99.9 MicronsStandard Deviation 93.75
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 4-109.4 MicronsStandard Deviation 100.87
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 8-122.2 MicronsStandard Deviation 109.58
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 12-126.3 MicronsStandard Deviation 111.55
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 16-99.2 MicronsStandard Deviation 110.47
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 20-125.5 MicronsStandard Deviation 117.39
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 24-101.8 MicronsStandard Deviation 113.21
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 28-124.1 MicronsStandard Deviation 111.51
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 32-104.3 MicronsStandard Deviation 116.09
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 40-103.1 MicronsStandard Deviation 109.25
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 44-129.4 MicronsStandard Deviation 114.7
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 48-109.2 MicronsStandard Deviation 120.75
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline to the Average of Weeks 40, 44 and 48 and Over TimeWeek 36-124.4 MicronsStandard Deviation 112.12
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: Full analysis set defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one treatment injection. Subjects will be analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Baseline17 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 211 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 410 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 811 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 1211 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 1611 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 2013 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 2411 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 2812 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 3214 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 3614 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 4014 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 449 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 4815 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 3613 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Baseline15 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 2413 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 212 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 4415 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 414 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 2813 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 813 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 4017 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 1212 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 3218 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 1610 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 4815 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time (≤38 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Week 2013 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: Full analysis set defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one treatment injection. Subjects will be analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Baseline122 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 2148 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 4156 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 8156 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 12148 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 16149 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 20151 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 24158 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 28151 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 32147 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 36147 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 40151 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 44149 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 48144 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 36179 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Baseline129 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 24183 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 2152 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 44178 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 4165 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 28175 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 8165 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 40174 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 12171 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 32174 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 16172 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 48175 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters)Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Week 20179 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over Time

Categorical improvements in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of clinically relevant BCVA measurements corresponding to 1, 2 and 3 lines of the ETDRS vision testing chart

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: Full analysis set defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one treatment injection. Subjects will be analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 2100 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 4110 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 8119 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 12124 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 16119 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 20121 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 24130 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 28122 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 32132 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 36120 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 40116 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 44126 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 48111 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 231 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 444 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 852 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 1255 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 1662 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2066 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2470 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2866 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 3257 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 3666 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4067 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4467 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4865 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 212 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 418 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 824 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 1220 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 1624 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 2028 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 2433 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 2836 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 3232 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 3632 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4033 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4434 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4835 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2490 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 296 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 1229 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 4129 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2887 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 8151 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 3237 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 12148 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 3295 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 16143 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 1633 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 20161 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 3681 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 24156 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4849 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 28154 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4080 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 32168 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 2033 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 36158 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4486 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 40156 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 3644 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 44151 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4885 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Week 48150 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 2442 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 237 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 211 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 454 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4448 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 872 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 421 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 1272 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 2846 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 1668 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 828 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2086 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeGain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4045 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over Time

Categorical worsening in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of clinically relevant BCVA measurements corresponding to 1, 2 and 3 lines of the ETDRS vision testing chart

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: Full analysis set defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one treatment injection. Subjects will be analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 220 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 427 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 841 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 1235 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 1635 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 2035 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 2434 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 2838 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 3241 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 3647 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 4033 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 4433 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 4839 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 26 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 46 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 810 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 1215 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 1615 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2016 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2417 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2821 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 3223 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 3622 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4021 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4418 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4824 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 23 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 44 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 84 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 126 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 169 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 207 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 247 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 287 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 3210 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 3614 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4018 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 448 Participants
KSI-301 (Treatment Group A)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4815 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2412 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 228 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 123 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 419 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2814 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 822 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 329 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 1224 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 3216 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 1631 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 165 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 2027 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 3618 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 2431 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4813 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 2831 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4024 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 3235 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 206 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 3632 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4421 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 4041 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 369 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 4433 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 4825 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters at Week 4838 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 246 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 210 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 24 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 44 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4411 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 88 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 44 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 129 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 285 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 1615 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 84 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 10 ETDRS Letters at Week 2014 Participants
Aflibercept (Treatment Group B)Proportion of Patients Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over TimeLoss ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters at Week 4013 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026