Depression, Anxiety, Eating Disorders, Overweight and Obesity
Conditions
Brief summary
Individuals suffering from depression and anxiety have an increased risk of obesity due to multiple factors such as side effects to psychotropic medications, associated appetite dysregulation, disruption of sleep, anergia leading to psychomotor retardation or inactivity, and increased stress hormones through the disruption in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Though not a causal relationship, an intimate bidirectional connection exists between the two conditions, which subsequently impacts the journey of weight loss. The impact mental health can have on weight loss is evident as concurrent depression and anxiety in individuals with obesity predicts poorer outcomes like decreased adherence and less success with weight loss interventions. Here, we will determine if delivery of psychoeducation regarding the primitive brain and model of safety in a group setting to those with obesity seeking weight loss intervention has an impact on not only psychiatric symptoms of depression and anxiety but also weight loss, eating behaviors, sleeping patterns, activity level, and health-related quality of life. This project will improve our understanding of the role of mental health and the stress response in obesity.
Detailed description
This project will recruit subjects seeking weight loss in the Dallas Fort Worth area. A screen consisting of patient's weight and height to calculate a patient's BMI will be completed. Pre-assessment measures of anxiety, depression, eating disorder symptoms, sleep, self-efficacy, quality of life, and weight-wellness related behaviors (sleeping patterns, exercise patterns, eating patterns) will be completed before the intervention using a secure online link to RedCap. Participants will then attend eight weekly sessions of a group psychoeducational intervention. The intervention includes eight modules of various topics including the psychoeducation on the primitive brain model, motivation, goal-setting, affirmations, rewards, promoting autonomy, reducing guilt, and relapse prevention. Participants will complete homework assignments, share their work with the group to elicit feedback, and participate in guided discussions. Post-assessments will be completed 1-4 weeks and 3-5 months after the interventions is completed. These measures will determine (1) if psychological symptoms are responsive to the intervention, and (2) if clinical symptom changes related to weight and quality of life are affected.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALWellness Education
Psychoeducation on relationships between mood, anxiety, eating, and exercise behaviors. One one-hour session each week for 8 weeks.
Sponsors
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Pilot study to examine acceptability, feasibility, and explore clinical responses related to wellness behaviors and quality of life.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* able to give informed consent * able to speak English sufficiently to understand study procedures, provide written informed consent for study participation, and complete questionnaires * BMI \> 25 * appropriate for outpatient care
Exclusion criteria
* medically unstable * inpatient medical * psychiatric inpatient * psychiatric residential care
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Physical Health Summary Scores from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For our primary measure, we will use the physical health to examine pain interference and intensity. PROMIS raw scores range from 9-50; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10 and where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in Mental Health Summary Scores from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For our primary measure, we will use the mental health summary score to examine anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles. PROMIS raw scores range from 12-60; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in Physical Health Summary Scores from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For our primary measure, we will use the physical health to examine pain interference and intensity. PROMIS raw scores range from 9-50; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10 and where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in Mental Health Summary Scores from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For our primary measure, we will use the mental health summary score to examine anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles. PROMIS raw scores range from 12-60; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in self-efficacy score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale measures how the respondent copes with daily hassles and adapts to stressful life events. Possible scores range from 10-40, with higher scores indicative of greater self-efficacy. |
| Change in self-efficacy score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale measures how the respondent copes with daily hassles and adapts to stressful life events. Possible scores range from 10-40, with higher scores indicative of greater self-efficacy. |
| Change in frequency of patients with eating disorders from Pre- assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Eating Disorder Screener for DSM-V (EDDS-5) screens a participant for the presence of an eating disorder. Should the screen be positive, a patient may meet criteria for an eating disorder. |
| Change in frequency of patients with eating disorders from Pre- assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Eating Disorder Screener for DSM-V (EDDS-5) screens a participant for the presence of an eating disorder. Should the screen be positive, a patient may meet criteria for an eating disorder. |
| Study components feedback score at 4 weeks after starting intervention | 4 weeks after starting intervention | The Weight Wellness Intervention Evaluation addresses study component feedback using both a rating scales and free form written commentary. Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more positive values. |
| Study components feedback score at 8 weeks after starting intervention | 8 weeks after starting intervention | The Weight Wellness Intervention Evaluation addresses study component feedback using both a rating scales and free form written commentary. Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more positive values. |
| Patient satisfaction score | 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | The Weight Wellness Group Intervention Evaluation form measured patient satisfaction (the impact and value of study) with free-form verbal responses as well as a single rating scale. Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction with the intervention. |
| Change in Behavioral Patterns from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Using the Wellness Pattern Questionnaire, consistency of eating, sleeping, and activity patterns are assessed. Possible scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores reflecting more consistent scheduling for these daily behaviors. |
| Change in Behavioral Patterns from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Time Frame: Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention end | Using the Wellness Pattern Questionnaire, consistency of eating, sleeping, and activity patterns are assessed. Possible scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores reflecting more consistent scheduling of daily behaviors. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in ability to participate in social roles and activities score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For our secondary measure, we will examine the sleep disturbance sub-section score. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in pain interference score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in pain interference score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in ASA dietary recall data analysis of food groups from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Automated Self-administered (ASA) Dietary Recall measures the foods and beverages consumed throughout the previous day. We will compare the dietary analysis (nutrients and food groups) reported by participant on the ASA Dietary Recall. |
| Change in ASA dietary recall data analysis of food groups from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention end | Automated Self-administered (ASA) Dietary Recall measures the foods and beverages consumed throughout the previous day. We will compare the dietary analysis (nutrients and food groups) reported by participant on the ASA Dietary Recall. |
| Change in weight from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Weight will be measured in pounds, percentage changed from baseline (loss or gain), and BMI. |
| Change in sleep pattern score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention end | Using the Wellness Patterns Questionnaire, effort and ability to keep a regular sleep schedule are assessed. Possible scores range from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating a more regular sleep pattern. |
| Change in eating pattern score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Using the Wellness Patterns Questionnaire, eating effort and ability to keep a regular eating pattern are assessed. Possible scores range from 0 to 16, with higher scores suggesting more consistent eating patterns. |
| Change in eating pattern score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention end | Using the Wellness Patterns Questionnaire, effort and ability to keep a regular eating pattern are assessed. Possible scores range from 0 to 16, with higher scores suggesting more consistent eating patterns. |
| Change in activity score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Using the Wellness Patterns Questionnaire, consistency of exercise and activity patterns is assessed. Possible scores range from 0 to 7, with higher scores reflecting more consistent engagement in exercise. |
| Change in activity score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention end | Using the Wellness Patterns Questionnaire, consistency of exercise and activity patterns is assessed. Possible scores range from 0 to 7, with higher scores reflecting more consistent engagement in exercise. |
| Change in sleep pattern score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Using the Wellness Patterns Questionnaire, effort and ability to keep a regular sleep schedule are assessed. Possible scores range from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating a more regular sleep pattern. |
| Change in weight from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Weight will be measured in pounds, percentage changed from baseline (loss or gain), and BMI. |
| Change in physical function score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. T-scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in physical function score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. T-scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in depression score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in depression score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in anxiety score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in anxiety score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in fatigue score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the fatigue sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in fatigue score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the fatigue sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in sleep disturbance score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in sleep disturbance score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 2 | Baseline, 3-5 months after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
| Change in ability to participate in social roles and activities score from Pre-assessment to Post-assessment 1 | Baseline, 1-4 weeks after intervention ends | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 Profile, v. 2.0 Adult Profile measures the patient's perceived quality of life over the past week using various criteria. For our secondary measure, we will examine the sleep disturbance sub-section score. For this secondary measure, we will examine the physical function sub-section score. PROMIS raw scores for this subscale range from 4 to 20; the PROMIS T-scores have a mean 50 and a standard deviation of 10 where higher scores indicate more symptoms and less functioning. Scores up to 55 are considered to be within normal range, scores of 55-60 are indicative of mild symptoms or minor impairment, scores of 61-70 are indicative of moderate symptoms or moderate impairment, and scores greater than 71 are indicative of severe symptoms or severe impairment. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed